Covid-19大流行对医院单位提供姑息治疗的影响:一项观察性研究的结果。

Igiene e sanita pubblica Pub Date : 2022-05-01
Anita Maria Tummolo, Mara Adelaide Ricciotti, Eleonora Meloni, Sabrina Dispenza, Marcello Di Pumpo, Gianfranco Damiani, Christian Barillaro
{"title":"Covid-19大流行对医院单位提供姑息治疗的影响:一项观察性研究的结果。","authors":"Anita Maria Tummolo,&nbsp;Mara Adelaide Ricciotti,&nbsp;Eleonora Meloni,&nbsp;Sabrina Dispenza,&nbsp;Marcello Di Pumpo,&nbsp;Gianfranco Damiani,&nbsp;Christian Barillaro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Palliative care is a key approach in improving the quality of life of patients and their families facing the end-of-life care process. It is widely regarded as a public-health concern, especially considering the rapidly increasing end-of-life care needs worldwide. Its provision has been highly challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic emergency. Objective This study aims to analyse whether and to what extent the provision of Palliative Care to non-COVID patients provided by a hospital-based unit has changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods A retrospective observational study was performed. All non-COVID patients admitted from October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 and evaluated by the hospital-based Palliative Care team were considered. Three time periods were considered: pre-lockdown, lockdown and post-lockdown. A trend analysis and multiple linear and logistic regressions to study and quantify the statistical significance of the associations were performed. Results A statistically significant positive linear trend of the number of hospitalized patients in need of Palliative Care was found over the study period. Compared to pre-lockdown, the rest of the study period presented more female and elderly patients, the length of stay and the number of patients discharged to a Hospice setting were significantly reduced. The waiting time did not change in lockdown but decreased in post-lockdown and the mortality rate was not significantly different. Also, the average number of Palliative Care consultations per patient significantly increased in the lockdown and post-lockdown. Discussion First, the significant admissions drop between the start of the pandemic and the following study period is in line with recent literature. The consequent rebound registered may be attributed to the high pressure from outside requiring admission and care. Second, the significantly older age of patients found during the lockdown than before the lockdown could be attributed to a \"selection effect\" of young patients, more able to delay hospitalization than the elderly, also in line with recent literature. Third, the shorter waiting time for Palliative Care activation the post-lockdown compared to the pre-lockdown period could be due to both increased hospital efficiency and to the greater pressure to discharge patients during the post-lockdown period. Also, the significant reduction in the lockdown and post-lockdown of the length of stay after Palliative Care activation could be explained considering both the greater receptivity of healthcare services outside the hospital, such as Hospices, and the greater pressure on hospital wards to discharge. Fourth, the unchanged in-hospital mortality rate remained over the entire period could be an indication of the high quality of care provided by this hospital setting to fragile patients, which is to be noted especially considering the average mortality rate registered during pandemic context in healthcare facilities. Conclusions The study aimed to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 on the provision of Palliative Care by a hospital-based team. We believe it might represent an innovative contribution and we hope similar research will be produced in order build the evidence for future challenges in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":73329,"journal":{"name":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","volume":" ","pages":"124-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on palliative care provision by a hospital-based unit: results from an observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Anita Maria Tummolo,&nbsp;Mara Adelaide Ricciotti,&nbsp;Eleonora Meloni,&nbsp;Sabrina Dispenza,&nbsp;Marcello Di Pumpo,&nbsp;Gianfranco Damiani,&nbsp;Christian Barillaro\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Palliative care is a key approach in improving the quality of life of patients and their families facing the end-of-life care process. It is widely regarded as a public-health concern, especially considering the rapidly increasing end-of-life care needs worldwide. Its provision has been highly challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic emergency. Objective This study aims to analyse whether and to what extent the provision of Palliative Care to non-COVID patients provided by a hospital-based unit has changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods A retrospective observational study was performed. All non-COVID patients admitted from October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 and evaluated by the hospital-based Palliative Care team were considered. Three time periods were considered: pre-lockdown, lockdown and post-lockdown. A trend analysis and multiple linear and logistic regressions to study and quantify the statistical significance of the associations were performed. Results A statistically significant positive linear trend of the number of hospitalized patients in need of Palliative Care was found over the study period. Compared to pre-lockdown, the rest of the study period presented more female and elderly patients, the length of stay and the number of patients discharged to a Hospice setting were significantly reduced. The waiting time did not change in lockdown but decreased in post-lockdown and the mortality rate was not significantly different. Also, the average number of Palliative Care consultations per patient significantly increased in the lockdown and post-lockdown. Discussion First, the significant admissions drop between the start of the pandemic and the following study period is in line with recent literature. The consequent rebound registered may be attributed to the high pressure from outside requiring admission and care. Second, the significantly older age of patients found during the lockdown than before the lockdown could be attributed to a \\\"selection effect\\\" of young patients, more able to delay hospitalization than the elderly, also in line with recent literature. Third, the shorter waiting time for Palliative Care activation the post-lockdown compared to the pre-lockdown period could be due to both increased hospital efficiency and to the greater pressure to discharge patients during the post-lockdown period. Also, the significant reduction in the lockdown and post-lockdown of the length of stay after Palliative Care activation could be explained considering both the greater receptivity of healthcare services outside the hospital, such as Hospices, and the greater pressure on hospital wards to discharge. Fourth, the unchanged in-hospital mortality rate remained over the entire period could be an indication of the high quality of care provided by this hospital setting to fragile patients, which is to be noted especially considering the average mortality rate registered during pandemic context in healthcare facilities. Conclusions The study aimed to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 on the provision of Palliative Care by a hospital-based team. We believe it might represent an innovative contribution and we hope similar research will be produced in order build the evidence for future challenges in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Igiene e sanita pubblica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"124-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Igiene e sanita pubblica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景姑息治疗是提高患者及其家属面对临终关怀过程的生活质量的关键方法。它被广泛认为是一个公共卫生问题,特别是考虑到世界范围内快速增长的临终关怀需求。COVID-19大流行紧急情况对其提供提出了高度挑战。目的本研究旨在分析在COVID-19大流行期间,医院单位向非COVID-19患者提供的姑息治疗是否发生了变化,以及在多大程度上发生了变化。材料与方法回顾性观察研究。考虑2019年10月1日至2020年9月30日期间入院并由医院姑息治疗团队评估的所有非covid患者。考虑了三个时间段:封锁前、封锁和封锁后。进行趋势分析和多元线性和逻辑回归来研究和量化这些关联的统计显著性。结果在研究期间,住院患者中需要姑息治疗的人数呈显著正线性趋势。与封锁前相比,研究期间的其余时间出现了更多的女性和老年患者,住院时间和出院到临终关怀机构的患者人数显着减少。封锁期间的等待时间没有变化,封锁后的等待时间减少,死亡率无显著差异。此外,在封锁期间和封锁后,每位患者的平均姑息治疗咨询次数显着增加。首先,从大流行开始到接下来的研究期间,入院人数显著下降与最近的文献一致。随后的反弹可能是由于外界的高压所致,需要住院和护理。其次,封锁期间发现的患者年龄明显比封锁前大,这可能归因于年轻患者的“选择效应”,他们比老年人更能推迟住院治疗,这也与最近的文献一致。第三,与封锁前相比,封锁后启动姑息治疗的等待时间更短,可能是由于医院效率提高,以及封锁后患者出院的压力更大。此外,考虑到医院外的医疗服务(如临终关怀院)更容易接受,以及医院病房的出院压力更大,可以解释姑息治疗启动后封锁和封锁后住院时间的显著减少。第四,住院死亡率在整个期间保持不变,这可能表明该医院为脆弱患者提供了高质量的护理,特别是考虑到大流行期间卫生保健设施登记的平均死亡率,这一点值得注意。该研究旨在量化COVID-19对医院团队提供姑息治疗的影响。我们相信这可能是一种创新的贡献,我们希望类似的研究能够产生,以便为该领域未来的挑战建立证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on palliative care provision by a hospital-based unit: results from an observational study.

Background Palliative care is a key approach in improving the quality of life of patients and their families facing the end-of-life care process. It is widely regarded as a public-health concern, especially considering the rapidly increasing end-of-life care needs worldwide. Its provision has been highly challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic emergency. Objective This study aims to analyse whether and to what extent the provision of Palliative Care to non-COVID patients provided by a hospital-based unit has changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods A retrospective observational study was performed. All non-COVID patients admitted from October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 and evaluated by the hospital-based Palliative Care team were considered. Three time periods were considered: pre-lockdown, lockdown and post-lockdown. A trend analysis and multiple linear and logistic regressions to study and quantify the statistical significance of the associations were performed. Results A statistically significant positive linear trend of the number of hospitalized patients in need of Palliative Care was found over the study period. Compared to pre-lockdown, the rest of the study period presented more female and elderly patients, the length of stay and the number of patients discharged to a Hospice setting were significantly reduced. The waiting time did not change in lockdown but decreased in post-lockdown and the mortality rate was not significantly different. Also, the average number of Palliative Care consultations per patient significantly increased in the lockdown and post-lockdown. Discussion First, the significant admissions drop between the start of the pandemic and the following study period is in line with recent literature. The consequent rebound registered may be attributed to the high pressure from outside requiring admission and care. Second, the significantly older age of patients found during the lockdown than before the lockdown could be attributed to a "selection effect" of young patients, more able to delay hospitalization than the elderly, also in line with recent literature. Third, the shorter waiting time for Palliative Care activation the post-lockdown compared to the pre-lockdown period could be due to both increased hospital efficiency and to the greater pressure to discharge patients during the post-lockdown period. Also, the significant reduction in the lockdown and post-lockdown of the length of stay after Palliative Care activation could be explained considering both the greater receptivity of healthcare services outside the hospital, such as Hospices, and the greater pressure on hospital wards to discharge. Fourth, the unchanged in-hospital mortality rate remained over the entire period could be an indication of the high quality of care provided by this hospital setting to fragile patients, which is to be noted especially considering the average mortality rate registered during pandemic context in healthcare facilities. Conclusions The study aimed to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 on the provision of Palliative Care by a hospital-based team. We believe it might represent an innovative contribution and we hope similar research will be produced in order build the evidence for future challenges in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信