儿科急诊科到初级保健的转诊方案:改变病人需要的途径

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
S. Barron Frazier, James C. Gay, Shari Barkin, Michelle Graham, Michele Walsh, Kathryn Carlson
{"title":"儿科急诊科到初级保健的转诊方案:改变病人需要的途径","authors":"S. Barron Frazier,&nbsp;James C. Gay,&nbsp;Shari Barkin,&nbsp;Michelle Graham,&nbsp;Michele Walsh,&nbsp;Kathryn Carlson","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Previous interventions to reduce emergency department (ED) overutilization from non-urgent visits have shown little success. At our hospital, we created an ED to </span>primary care clinic (PCC) transfer protocol for non-urgent ED visits of established patients. Our study analyzed the impact of this protocol on patient encounters.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Chart reviews were conducted for a retrospective cohort of transfers from the ED to PCC from 9/01/17–8/31/18. Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), cost, and need for return to the ED. Cost savings were calculated by comparing encounters with identical primary diagnoses in the ED with internal technical and professional financial data. Secondary outcomes were final diagnoses and primary care services provided.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>374 patient encounters were transferred from ED to PCC. The five most common diagnoses were viral upper respiratory infection<span> (n=80, 21.4%), dermatologic<span><span> diagnoses (n=37, 9.9%), acute otitis media (n=35, 9.4%), </span>pharyngitis (n=34, 9.1%), and influenza (n=34, 9.1%). Overall, total cost savings equaled approximately $100,000. For the top 10 diagnoses, costs were reduced from $29-$46 per $100 of ED costs and LOS was reduced by a mean of 49 min/encounter. For 9 of these 10 conditions, costs exceeded reimbursement in both settings; however, evaluation in PCC versus ED reduced the loss of revenue by 10–68%. Sixty-four encounters (17.1%) received additional primary care services. There were no safety events or inappropriate transfers.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This protocol provided a safe, efficient method for patients to be evaluated in their medical home while reducing non-urgent emergency visits in the ED.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>VI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"10 3","pages":"Article 100643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric emergency department to primary care transfer protocol: Transforming access for patients’ needs\",\"authors\":\"S. Barron Frazier,&nbsp;James C. Gay,&nbsp;Shari Barkin,&nbsp;Michelle Graham,&nbsp;Michele Walsh,&nbsp;Kathryn Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Previous interventions to reduce emergency department (ED) overutilization from non-urgent visits have shown little success. At our hospital, we created an ED to </span>primary care clinic (PCC) transfer protocol for non-urgent ED visits of established patients. Our study analyzed the impact of this protocol on patient encounters.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Chart reviews were conducted for a retrospective cohort of transfers from the ED to PCC from 9/01/17–8/31/18. Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), cost, and need for return to the ED. Cost savings were calculated by comparing encounters with identical primary diagnoses in the ED with internal technical and professional financial data. Secondary outcomes were final diagnoses and primary care services provided.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>374 patient encounters were transferred from ED to PCC. The five most common diagnoses were viral upper respiratory infection<span> (n=80, 21.4%), dermatologic<span><span> diagnoses (n=37, 9.9%), acute otitis media (n=35, 9.4%), </span>pharyngitis (n=34, 9.1%), and influenza (n=34, 9.1%). Overall, total cost savings equaled approximately $100,000. For the top 10 diagnoses, costs were reduced from $29-$46 per $100 of ED costs and LOS was reduced by a mean of 49 min/encounter. For 9 of these 10 conditions, costs exceeded reimbursement in both settings; however, evaluation in PCC versus ED reduced the loss of revenue by 10–68%. Sixty-four encounters (17.1%) received additional primary care services. There were no safety events or inappropriate transfers.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This protocol provided a safe, efficient method for patients to be evaluated in their medical home while reducing non-urgent emergency visits in the ED.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>VI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642200032X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642200032X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景以前的干预措施,以减少急诊室(ED)的过度使用从非紧急访问显示很少成功。在我们医院,我们创建了一个急诊室到初级保健诊所(PCC)的转移方案,用于非紧急急诊科就诊的既定患者。我们的研究分析了该方案对患者接触的影响。方法对2017年1月9日至2018年8月31日从急诊科转至PCC的回顾性队列进行回顾性分析。主要结果包括住院时间(LOS)、费用和返回急诊科的需要。通过比较急诊科相同的初次诊断与内部技术和专业财务数据的接触,计算节省的费用。次要结局是最终诊断和提供的初级保健服务。结果374例患者从急诊科转至急诊科。最常见的5种诊断为病毒性上呼吸道感染(n=80, 21.4%)、皮肤病诊断(n=37, 9.9%)、急性中耳炎(n=35, 9.4%)、咽炎(n=34, 9.1%)和流感(n=34, 9.1%)。总的来说,节省的总费用约为10万美元。对于前10名的诊断,每100美元的ED费用从29美元减少到46美元,平均每次就诊时间减少49分钟。对于这10种情况中的9种,两种情况下的费用都超过了报销;然而,与ED相比,PCC的评估减少了10-68%的收入损失。64例(17.1%)获得了额外的初级保健服务。没有安全事件或不适当的转移。结论:该方案为患者提供了一种安全、有效的方法,可在其医疗家中对患者进行评估,同时减少ed的非紧急急诊就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric emergency department to primary care transfer protocol: Transforming access for patients’ needs

Background

Previous interventions to reduce emergency department (ED) overutilization from non-urgent visits have shown little success. At our hospital, we created an ED to primary care clinic (PCC) transfer protocol for non-urgent ED visits of established patients. Our study analyzed the impact of this protocol on patient encounters.

Methods

Chart reviews were conducted for a retrospective cohort of transfers from the ED to PCC from 9/01/17–8/31/18. Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), cost, and need for return to the ED. Cost savings were calculated by comparing encounters with identical primary diagnoses in the ED with internal technical and professional financial data. Secondary outcomes were final diagnoses and primary care services provided.

Results

374 patient encounters were transferred from ED to PCC. The five most common diagnoses were viral upper respiratory infection (n=80, 21.4%), dermatologic diagnoses (n=37, 9.9%), acute otitis media (n=35, 9.4%), pharyngitis (n=34, 9.1%), and influenza (n=34, 9.1%). Overall, total cost savings equaled approximately $100,000. For the top 10 diagnoses, costs were reduced from $29-$46 per $100 of ED costs and LOS was reduced by a mean of 49 min/encounter. For 9 of these 10 conditions, costs exceeded reimbursement in both settings; however, evaluation in PCC versus ED reduced the loss of revenue by 10–68%. Sixty-four encounters (17.1%) received additional primary care services. There were no safety events or inappropriate transfers.

Conclusions

This protocol provided a safe, efficient method for patients to be evaluated in their medical home while reducing non-urgent emergency visits in the ED.

Level of evidence

VI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信