弹性成像和肝脏疾病的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastroenterology Research Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-19 DOI:10.14740/gr1557
Preeti Malik, Shreejith Pillai, Kriti Agarwal, Salwa Abdelwahed, Renu Bhandari, Abhishek Singh, Anusha Chidharla, Kajal Patel, Priyanka Singh, Pritika Manaktala, Rizwan Rabbani, Thoyaja Koritala, Sachin Gupta
{"title":"弹性成像和肝脏疾病的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Preeti Malik,&nbsp;Shreejith Pillai,&nbsp;Kriti Agarwal,&nbsp;Salwa Abdelwahed,&nbsp;Renu Bhandari,&nbsp;Abhishek Singh,&nbsp;Anusha Chidharla,&nbsp;Kajal Patel,&nbsp;Priyanka Singh,&nbsp;Pritika Manaktala,&nbsp;Rizwan Rabbani,&nbsp;Thoyaja Koritala,&nbsp;Sachin Gupta","doi":"10.14740/gr1557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-based transient elastography (TE) is a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy for the staging of hepatic fibrosis due to various chronic liver diseases. This meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TE for detecting liver cirrhosis (F4) and severe fibrosis (F3) in patients with chronic liver diseases, in comparison to the gold standard liver biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed using PubMed search engine following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines from inception to May 2021. The meta-analysis studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of TE for severe fibrosis and cirrhosis were identified. We conducted a meta-meta-analysis to generate pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for F3 and F4 fibrosis stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included five studies with a total of 124 sub-studies and 20,341 patients in our analysis. Three studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F3/severe fibrosis stage and found 81.9% pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-83.7%; P < 0.001) (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), 84.7% pooled specificity (95% CI: 81.3-87.6%) (I<sup>2</sup> = 81%; P = 0.02). All five studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F4/liver cirrhosis stage. We found 84.8% pooled sensitivity (95% CI: 81.4-87.7%) (I<sup>2</sup> = 86.4%; P < 0.001), 87.5% pooled specificity (95% CI: 85.4-89.3%) (I<sup>2</sup> = 90%; P < 0.001) and pooled diagnostic OR (41.8; 95% CI: 3.9 - 56.5) (I<sup>2</sup> = 87%; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-based TE has excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying cirrhosis and liver fibrosis stages 3. Future studies should focus on estimating the diagnostic accuracy of other fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease patients. This will eventually decrease the risk associated with invasive liver biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/32/4d/gr-15-232.PMC9635782.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Preeti Malik,&nbsp;Shreejith Pillai,&nbsp;Kriti Agarwal,&nbsp;Salwa Abdelwahed,&nbsp;Renu Bhandari,&nbsp;Abhishek Singh,&nbsp;Anusha Chidharla,&nbsp;Kajal Patel,&nbsp;Priyanka Singh,&nbsp;Pritika Manaktala,&nbsp;Rizwan Rabbani,&nbsp;Thoyaja Koritala,&nbsp;Sachin Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/gr1557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-based transient elastography (TE) is a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy for the staging of hepatic fibrosis due to various chronic liver diseases. This meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TE for detecting liver cirrhosis (F4) and severe fibrosis (F3) in patients with chronic liver diseases, in comparison to the gold standard liver biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed using PubMed search engine following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines from inception to May 2021. The meta-analysis studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of TE for severe fibrosis and cirrhosis were identified. We conducted a meta-meta-analysis to generate pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for F3 and F4 fibrosis stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included five studies with a total of 124 sub-studies and 20,341 patients in our analysis. Three studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F3/severe fibrosis stage and found 81.9% pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-83.7%; P < 0.001) (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), 84.7% pooled specificity (95% CI: 81.3-87.6%) (I<sup>2</sup> = 81%; P = 0.02). All five studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F4/liver cirrhosis stage. We found 84.8% pooled sensitivity (95% CI: 81.4-87.7%) (I<sup>2</sup> = 86.4%; P < 0.001), 87.5% pooled specificity (95% CI: 85.4-89.3%) (I<sup>2</sup> = 90%; P < 0.001) and pooled diagnostic OR (41.8; 95% CI: 3.9 - 56.5) (I<sup>2</sup> = 87%; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-based TE has excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying cirrhosis and liver fibrosis stages 3. Future studies should focus on estimating the diagnostic accuracy of other fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease patients. This will eventually decrease the risk associated with invasive liver biopsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/32/4d/gr-15-232.PMC9635782.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:基于超声的瞬时弹性成像(TE)是一种非侵入性替代肝活检的方法,用于各种慢性肝病引起的肝纤维化分期。本荟萃分析旨在评估TE检测慢性肝病患者肝硬化(F4)和严重纤维化(F3)的诊断准确性,并与金标准肝活检进行比较。方法:使用PubMed搜索引擎,按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行系统搜索,从成立到2021年5月。meta分析研究评估了TE对严重纤维化和肝硬化的诊断准确性。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,对F3和F4纤维化分期的敏感性、特异性和诊断优势比(ORs)进行汇总估计。结果:我们在分析中纳入了5项研究,共124个亚研究和20341名患者。三项研究报道了TE在检测F3/严重纤维化阶段的诊断准确性,发现合并敏感性为81.9%(95%可信区间(CI): 79.9-83.7%;P < 0.001) (I2 = 0%),合并特异性为84.7% (95% CI: 81.3-87.6%) (I2 = 81%;P = 0.02)。5项研究均报道了TE对F4/肝硬化分期的诊断准确性。我们发现合并敏感性为84.8% (95% CI: 81.4-87.7%) (I2 = 86.4%;P < 0.001), 87.5%的合并特异性(95% CI: 85.4-89.3%) (I2 = 90%;P < 0.001)和合并诊断OR (41.8;95% ci: 3.9 - 56.5) (i2 = 87%;P < 0.001)。结论:基于超声的TE诊断肝硬化和肝纤维化3期具有很好的准确性。未来的研究应侧重于评估慢性肝病患者其他纤维化分期的诊断准确性。这将最终降低与侵入性肝活检相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Ultrasound-based transient elastography (TE) is a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy for the staging of hepatic fibrosis due to various chronic liver diseases. This meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TE for detecting liver cirrhosis (F4) and severe fibrosis (F3) in patients with chronic liver diseases, in comparison to the gold standard liver biopsy.

Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed search engine following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines from inception to May 2021. The meta-analysis studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of TE for severe fibrosis and cirrhosis were identified. We conducted a meta-meta-analysis to generate pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for F3 and F4 fibrosis stage.

Results: We included five studies with a total of 124 sub-studies and 20,341 patients in our analysis. Three studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F3/severe fibrosis stage and found 81.9% pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-83.7%; P < 0.001) (I2 = 0%), 84.7% pooled specificity (95% CI: 81.3-87.6%) (I2 = 81%; P = 0.02). All five studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F4/liver cirrhosis stage. We found 84.8% pooled sensitivity (95% CI: 81.4-87.7%) (I2 = 86.4%; P < 0.001), 87.5% pooled specificity (95% CI: 85.4-89.3%) (I2 = 90%; P < 0.001) and pooled diagnostic OR (41.8; 95% CI: 3.9 - 56.5) (I2 = 87%; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Ultrasound-based TE has excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying cirrhosis and liver fibrosis stages 3. Future studies should focus on estimating the diagnostic accuracy of other fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease patients. This will eventually decrease the risk associated with invasive liver biopsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Research
Gastroenterology Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信