制备各种形式生物相容性异皮材料的最佳方法选择。

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-28 DOI:10.17691/stm2022.14.1.04
К I Melkonyan, Y А Kozmai, А А Verevkin, Т V Rusinova, А S Asyakina, М L Zolotavina
{"title":"制备各种形式生物相容性异皮材料的最佳方法选择。","authors":"К I Melkonyan,&nbsp;Y А Kozmai,&nbsp;А А Verevkin,&nbsp;Т V Rusinova,&nbsp;А S Asyakina,&nbsp;М L Zolotavina","doi":"10.17691/stm2022.14.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>The aim of the study</b> was to select the optimal method for creating surgical porcine dermis-based biomaterials and to assess their biological safety.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To create xenodermal biomaterials, the native skin of a 4-month-old Landrace pig was used. The porcine dermis was processed with saline (protocol No.1), peroxide-alkaline (protocol No.2), and alkaline (protocol No.3) solutions. The obtained samples were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and a DAPI fluorescent dye. Quantitative DNA analysis and assessment of cytotoxicity by the LIVE/DEAD assay were also performed. Samples were implanted/injected subcutaneously to 6-month-old male Wistar rats (n=30) weighing 260±20 g and explanted on day 14 of the experiment. Histological sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Computer morphometry was performed using GraphPad Prism v. 6.04.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Samples of surgical materials obtained according to the three protocols had different physical characteristics: dermis treated according to protocol No.1 was dense and white in color after processing; samples processed by protocol No.2 were transparent and dense, and samples treated according to protocol No.3 had transparent gel-like structures. Histological analysis has shown oxyphilicity and extracellular matrix structure loss in all samples, and DAPI staining has revealed the destruction of cell nuclei. Nevertheless, DNA amount in the samples processed according to protocol No.1 did not meet the established quality criterion for decellularization (50 ng/mg dry weight). Further cytotoxicity assessment <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> was carried out only for samples fabricated according to protocols No.2 and No.3. According to the LIVE/DEAD analysis, both samples were not cytotoxic. On day 14 after the subcutaneous sample implantation, no signs of suppuration and immune rejection were found in the animals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To obtain surgical materials in the form of bioplastic coatings, it is recommended to use alkaline-peroxide treatment of the dermis, while hydrogel coatings are produced by alkaline hydrolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51886,"journal":{"name":"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of the Optimal Method for Creating Various Forms of Biocompatible Xenodermal Materials.\",\"authors\":\"К I Melkonyan,&nbsp;Y А Kozmai,&nbsp;А А Verevkin,&nbsp;Т V Rusinova,&nbsp;А S Asyakina,&nbsp;М L Zolotavina\",\"doi\":\"10.17691/stm2022.14.1.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>The aim of the study</b> was to select the optimal method for creating surgical porcine dermis-based biomaterials and to assess their biological safety.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To create xenodermal biomaterials, the native skin of a 4-month-old Landrace pig was used. The porcine dermis was processed with saline (protocol No.1), peroxide-alkaline (protocol No.2), and alkaline (protocol No.3) solutions. The obtained samples were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and a DAPI fluorescent dye. Quantitative DNA analysis and assessment of cytotoxicity by the LIVE/DEAD assay were also performed. Samples were implanted/injected subcutaneously to 6-month-old male Wistar rats (n=30) weighing 260±20 g and explanted on day 14 of the experiment. Histological sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Computer morphometry was performed using GraphPad Prism v. 6.04.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Samples of surgical materials obtained according to the three protocols had different physical characteristics: dermis treated according to protocol No.1 was dense and white in color after processing; samples processed by protocol No.2 were transparent and dense, and samples treated according to protocol No.3 had transparent gel-like structures. Histological analysis has shown oxyphilicity and extracellular matrix structure loss in all samples, and DAPI staining has revealed the destruction of cell nuclei. Nevertheless, DNA amount in the samples processed according to protocol No.1 did not meet the established quality criterion for decellularization (50 ng/mg dry weight). Further cytotoxicity assessment <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> was carried out only for samples fabricated according to protocols No.2 and No.3. According to the LIVE/DEAD analysis, both samples were not cytotoxic. On day 14 after the subcutaneous sample implantation, no signs of suppuration and immune rejection were found in the animals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To obtain surgical materials in the form of bioplastic coatings, it is recommended to use alkaline-peroxide treatment of the dermis, while hydrogel coatings are produced by alkaline hydrolysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376758/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2022.14.1.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2022.14.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是选择制备手术用猪真皮基生物材料的最佳方法,并评估其生物安全性。材料与方法:采用4月龄长白猪的天然皮肤制备异种真皮生物材料。猪真皮分别用生理盐水(方案1)、过氧化物碱性溶液(方案2)和碱性溶液(方案3)处理。用苏木精-伊红和DAPI荧光染料对所得样品进行染色。还进行了定量DNA分析和LIVE/DEAD试验的细胞毒性评估。将样品植入/皮下注射于体重260±20 g的6月龄雄性Wistar大鼠(n=30),并于实验第14天取出。组织切片用苏木精-伊红染色。使用GraphPad Prism v. 6.04进行计算机形态测量。结果:三种方案获得的手术材料样品具有不同的物理特征:方案1处理后的真皮层致密,颜色呈白色;方案2处理的样品透明致密,方案3处理的样品具有透明的凝胶状结构。组织学分析显示所有样品的亲氧性和细胞外基质结构丢失,DAPI染色显示细胞核破坏。然而,根据方案1处理的样品中的DNA量不符合既定的脱细胞质量标准(50 ng/mg干重)。进一步的体外和体内细胞毒性评估仅对根据方案2和方案3制备的样品进行。根据LIVE/DEAD分析,两种样品均无细胞毒性。皮下样品植入后第14天,动物未见化脓和免疫排斥现象。结论:为了获得生物塑料涂层形式的手术材料,建议使用碱性过氧化处理真皮,而水凝胶涂层则采用碱性水解制备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Selection of the Optimal Method for Creating Various Forms of Biocompatible Xenodermal Materials.

Selection of the Optimal Method for Creating Various Forms of Biocompatible Xenodermal Materials.

Selection of the Optimal Method for Creating Various Forms of Biocompatible Xenodermal Materials.

Selection of the Optimal Method for Creating Various Forms of Biocompatible Xenodermal Materials.

The aim of the study was to select the optimal method for creating surgical porcine dermis-based biomaterials and to assess their biological safety.

Materials and methods: To create xenodermal biomaterials, the native skin of a 4-month-old Landrace pig was used. The porcine dermis was processed with saline (protocol No.1), peroxide-alkaline (protocol No.2), and alkaline (protocol No.3) solutions. The obtained samples were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and a DAPI fluorescent dye. Quantitative DNA analysis and assessment of cytotoxicity by the LIVE/DEAD assay were also performed. Samples were implanted/injected subcutaneously to 6-month-old male Wistar rats (n=30) weighing 260±20 g and explanted on day 14 of the experiment. Histological sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Computer morphometry was performed using GraphPad Prism v. 6.04.

Results: Samples of surgical materials obtained according to the three protocols had different physical characteristics: dermis treated according to protocol No.1 was dense and white in color after processing; samples processed by protocol No.2 were transparent and dense, and samples treated according to protocol No.3 had transparent gel-like structures. Histological analysis has shown oxyphilicity and extracellular matrix structure loss in all samples, and DAPI staining has revealed the destruction of cell nuclei. Nevertheless, DNA amount in the samples processed according to protocol No.1 did not meet the established quality criterion for decellularization (50 ng/mg dry weight). Further cytotoxicity assessment in vitro and in vivo was carried out only for samples fabricated according to protocols No.2 and No.3. According to the LIVE/DEAD analysis, both samples were not cytotoxic. On day 14 after the subcutaneous sample implantation, no signs of suppuration and immune rejection were found in the animals.

Conclusion: To obtain surgical materials in the form of bioplastic coatings, it is recommended to use alkaline-peroxide treatment of the dermis, while hydrogel coatings are produced by alkaline hydrolysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine
Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信