上颌窦前壁骨重建方法的比较(实验研究)。

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-28 DOI:10.17691/stm2022.14.1.05
E M Trubushkina, E M Boyko, D V Stomatov, I V Rzhepakovsky, S I Piskov, D S-A Yeldashev, A A Kutsenko, A A Dolgalev
{"title":"上颌窦前壁骨重建方法的比较(实验研究)。","authors":"E M Trubushkina,&nbsp;E M Boyko,&nbsp;D V Stomatov,&nbsp;I V Rzhepakovsky,&nbsp;S I Piskov,&nbsp;D S-A Yeldashev,&nbsp;A A Kutsenko,&nbsp;A A Dolgalev","doi":"10.17691/stm2022.14.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>The aim of the study</b> was to compare various methods used for the bone reconstruction in the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus during sinus lift surgery; in addition, we aimed to study the effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on the healing process.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The experiments were carried out using the North Caucasian sheep. Maxillary sinus lift surgery was performed on the animals under general anesthesia. The skin and muscle fascia were dissected layer-by-layer providing the optimal conditions for bone preparation; then, three bone windows were made on each side of the head. Two windows were sawn out with a spherical bur, the third window - with a hollow bur and part of the anterior wall was taken out. On one side, the mucous membrane of the maxillary sinus was pulled and perforated; on the other side, the sinus lift was performed with no membrane perforation. On each side, one window was left uncovered, the second was closed with a collagen membrane, and the third was closed with a bone cover. After 30 and 60 days, the sheep were taken out of the experiment in groups of three; samples were collected from the operated areas and examined using computed microtomography and histology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the histological study, the bone repair process developed normally regardless of the surgery technique. The process started with the appearance of granulation tissue and connective tissue cords; in the final stages, cellular differentiation, pronounced osteoblastic activity, and inter-beam formation were seen.The most active regeneration was observed in the areas where the bone defects were closed with a collagen membrane, and especially in the windows made with no perforation of the maxillary sinus membrane. The microtomographic and histological tests proved that perforation of the mucous membrane during the sinus lift operation impaired bone tissue regeneration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The obtained results suggest that the most promising way to close a bone defect in the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus is the use of a collagen membrane; therefore, we recommend choosing this approach for sinus lift surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51886,"journal":{"name":"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison of Methods for Bone Reconstruction in the Anterior Wall of the Maxillary Sinus (an Experimental Study).\",\"authors\":\"E M Trubushkina,&nbsp;E M Boyko,&nbsp;D V Stomatov,&nbsp;I V Rzhepakovsky,&nbsp;S I Piskov,&nbsp;D S-A Yeldashev,&nbsp;A A Kutsenko,&nbsp;A A Dolgalev\",\"doi\":\"10.17691/stm2022.14.1.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>The aim of the study</b> was to compare various methods used for the bone reconstruction in the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus during sinus lift surgery; in addition, we aimed to study the effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on the healing process.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The experiments were carried out using the North Caucasian sheep. Maxillary sinus lift surgery was performed on the animals under general anesthesia. The skin and muscle fascia were dissected layer-by-layer providing the optimal conditions for bone preparation; then, three bone windows were made on each side of the head. Two windows were sawn out with a spherical bur, the third window - with a hollow bur and part of the anterior wall was taken out. On one side, the mucous membrane of the maxillary sinus was pulled and perforated; on the other side, the sinus lift was performed with no membrane perforation. On each side, one window was left uncovered, the second was closed with a collagen membrane, and the third was closed with a bone cover. After 30 and 60 days, the sheep were taken out of the experiment in groups of three; samples were collected from the operated areas and examined using computed microtomography and histology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the histological study, the bone repair process developed normally regardless of the surgery technique. The process started with the appearance of granulation tissue and connective tissue cords; in the final stages, cellular differentiation, pronounced osteoblastic activity, and inter-beam formation were seen.The most active regeneration was observed in the areas where the bone defects were closed with a collagen membrane, and especially in the windows made with no perforation of the maxillary sinus membrane. The microtomographic and histological tests proved that perforation of the mucous membrane during the sinus lift operation impaired bone tissue regeneration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The obtained results suggest that the most promising way to close a bone defect in the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus is the use of a collagen membrane; therefore, we recommend choosing this approach for sinus lift surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2022.14.1.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2022.14.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较上颌窦提升术中用于上颌窦前壁骨重建的各种方法;此外,我们旨在研究上颌窦膜穿孔对愈合过程的影响。材料与方法:以北高加索羊为实验对象。上颌窦提升术在全身麻醉下进行。逐层剥离皮肤和肌筋膜,为骨制备提供最佳条件;然后,在头部两侧各做三个骨窗。两扇窗户被球形锯掉了,第三扇窗户被空心锯掉了,前壁的一部分被锯掉了。一侧上颌窦粘膜拉扯穿孔;另一侧鼻窦提升术无膜穿孔。在每一侧,一个窗户未被覆盖,第二个用胶原蛋白膜关闭,第三个用骨盖关闭。试验30、60 d后,将试验羊分成3组退出试验;从手术区域收集样本,并使用计算机显微断层扫描和组织学检查。结果:组织学研究表明,无论手术技术如何,骨修复过程均进展正常。这个过程开始于肉芽组织和结缔组织绳的出现;在最后阶段,可以看到细胞分化,明显的成骨细胞活性和梁间形成。在用胶原膜封闭骨缺损的区域,特别是在没有穿孔的上颌窦膜的窗口处,观察到最活跃的再生。显微层析和组织学检查证实,窦提术中粘膜穿孔损害了骨组织再生。结论:应用胶原膜修复上颌窦前壁骨缺损是最理想的方法;因此,我们建议选择这种入路进行鼻窦提升手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Comparison of Methods for Bone Reconstruction in the Anterior Wall of the Maxillary Sinus (an Experimental Study).

The Comparison of Methods for Bone Reconstruction in the Anterior Wall of the Maxillary Sinus (an Experimental Study).

The Comparison of Methods for Bone Reconstruction in the Anterior Wall of the Maxillary Sinus (an Experimental Study).

The Comparison of Methods for Bone Reconstruction in the Anterior Wall of the Maxillary Sinus (an Experimental Study).

The aim of the study was to compare various methods used for the bone reconstruction in the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus during sinus lift surgery; in addition, we aimed to study the effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on the healing process.

Materials and methods: The experiments were carried out using the North Caucasian sheep. Maxillary sinus lift surgery was performed on the animals under general anesthesia. The skin and muscle fascia were dissected layer-by-layer providing the optimal conditions for bone preparation; then, three bone windows were made on each side of the head. Two windows were sawn out with a spherical bur, the third window - with a hollow bur and part of the anterior wall was taken out. On one side, the mucous membrane of the maxillary sinus was pulled and perforated; on the other side, the sinus lift was performed with no membrane perforation. On each side, one window was left uncovered, the second was closed with a collagen membrane, and the third was closed with a bone cover. After 30 and 60 days, the sheep were taken out of the experiment in groups of three; samples were collected from the operated areas and examined using computed microtomography and histology.

Results: According to the histological study, the bone repair process developed normally regardless of the surgery technique. The process started with the appearance of granulation tissue and connective tissue cords; in the final stages, cellular differentiation, pronounced osteoblastic activity, and inter-beam formation were seen.The most active regeneration was observed in the areas where the bone defects were closed with a collagen membrane, and especially in the windows made with no perforation of the maxillary sinus membrane. The microtomographic and histological tests proved that perforation of the mucous membrane during the sinus lift operation impaired bone tissue regeneration.

Conclusion: The obtained results suggest that the most promising way to close a bone defect in the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus is the use of a collagen membrane; therefore, we recommend choosing this approach for sinus lift surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine
Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信