肯尼亚粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌耐药性和毒力因素的测定及其与临床和人口统计学因素的关系

IF 1.1 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Pathogens Pub Date : 2022-11-09 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/3129439
Martin Georges, Erick Odoyo, Daniel Matano, Fredrick Tiria, Cecilia Kyany'a, Daniel Mbwika, Winnie C Mutai, Lillian Musila
{"title":"肯尼亚粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌耐药性和毒力因素的测定及其与临床和人口统计学因素的关系","authors":"Martin Georges,&nbsp;Erick Odoyo,&nbsp;Daniel Matano,&nbsp;Fredrick Tiria,&nbsp;Cecilia Kyany'a,&nbsp;Daniel Mbwika,&nbsp;Winnie C Mutai,&nbsp;Lillian Musila","doi":"10.1155/2022/3129439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enterococci are clinically significant because of their increasing antibiotic resistance and their ability to cause severe infections due to an arsenal of virulence genes. Few studies in the developing world have examined virulence factors that may significantly impact patient outcomes. This study describes the antimicrobial resistance profiles and prevalence of five key <i>Enterococcal virulence</i> genes <i>gelE</i>, <i>asa</i>, <i>cylA</i>, <i>esp,</i> and <i>hyl</i> in forty-four clinical <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>E. faecium</i> isolates in Kenya and their association with patients' demographic and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All <i>E. faecium</i> isolates were obtained from hospital-acquired skin and soft tissue infections. While <i>E. faecalis</i> was associated with community-acquired urinary tract infections. All isolates were resistant to erythromycin, whereas 11/44 (27.5%), 25/44 (56.8%), 28/44 (63.6%), 37/44 (84.1%), 40/44 (90.0%), and 43/44 (97.5%) were susceptible to tetracycline, levofloxacin, gentamicin, ampicillin, nitrofurantoin, and teicoplanin, respectively. All isolates were susceptible to tigecycline, vancomycin, and linezolid. There was little difference in the antibiotic resistance profiles between <i>E. faecalis</i> and <i>E. faecium</i>. The prevalence of the virulence genes among the 44 isolates were 27 (61.4%) for <i>gelE</i>, 26 (59.1%) for <i>asa1</i>, 16 (36.3%) for <i>esp,</i> 11 (25.0%) for <i>cylA,</i> and 1 (2.3%) for <i>hyl</i>. 72.9% of <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates had multiple virulence genes compared to 57% of <i>E. faecium</i> isolates with no virulence genes. The <i>hyl</i> gene was only detected in <i>E. faecium,</i> while <i>cylA</i> and <i>asa1</i> were only detected in <i>E. faecalis</i>. A significant correlation was observed between the presence of <i>asa1</i> and <i>esp</i> virulence genes and tetracycline resistance (<i>P</i>=0.0305 and 0.0363, respectively). A significant correlation was also observed between the presence of virulence genes <i>gelE</i> and <i>asa1</i> and nitrofurantoin resistance (<i>P</i>=0.0175 and 0.0225, respectively) and ampicillin resistance (<i>P</i>=0.0005 and 0.0008, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the high levels of erythromycin resistance in <i>E. faecalis</i> and <i>E. faecium</i>, the demographic factors influencing the species distribution among patients, and the accumulation of multiple virulence genes in <i>E. faecalis.</i> The significant association of <i>gelE</i>, <i>asa1,</i> and <i>esp</i> virulence genes with drug resistance could explain the pathogenic success of <i>E. faecalis</i> and provides a guide for future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathogens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668473/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Factors and Their Association with Clinical and Demographic Factors in Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Georges,&nbsp;Erick Odoyo,&nbsp;Daniel Matano,&nbsp;Fredrick Tiria,&nbsp;Cecilia Kyany'a,&nbsp;Daniel Mbwika,&nbsp;Winnie C Mutai,&nbsp;Lillian Musila\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/3129439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enterococci are clinically significant because of their increasing antibiotic resistance and their ability to cause severe infections due to an arsenal of virulence genes. Few studies in the developing world have examined virulence factors that may significantly impact patient outcomes. This study describes the antimicrobial resistance profiles and prevalence of five key <i>Enterococcal virulence</i> genes <i>gelE</i>, <i>asa</i>, <i>cylA</i>, <i>esp,</i> and <i>hyl</i> in forty-four clinical <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>E. faecium</i> isolates in Kenya and their association with patients' demographic and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All <i>E. faecium</i> isolates were obtained from hospital-acquired skin and soft tissue infections. While <i>E. faecalis</i> was associated with community-acquired urinary tract infections. All isolates were resistant to erythromycin, whereas 11/44 (27.5%), 25/44 (56.8%), 28/44 (63.6%), 37/44 (84.1%), 40/44 (90.0%), and 43/44 (97.5%) were susceptible to tetracycline, levofloxacin, gentamicin, ampicillin, nitrofurantoin, and teicoplanin, respectively. All isolates were susceptible to tigecycline, vancomycin, and linezolid. There was little difference in the antibiotic resistance profiles between <i>E. faecalis</i> and <i>E. faecium</i>. The prevalence of the virulence genes among the 44 isolates were 27 (61.4%) for <i>gelE</i>, 26 (59.1%) for <i>asa1</i>, 16 (36.3%) for <i>esp,</i> 11 (25.0%) for <i>cylA,</i> and 1 (2.3%) for <i>hyl</i>. 72.9% of <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates had multiple virulence genes compared to 57% of <i>E. faecium</i> isolates with no virulence genes. The <i>hyl</i> gene was only detected in <i>E. faecium,</i> while <i>cylA</i> and <i>asa1</i> were only detected in <i>E. faecalis</i>. A significant correlation was observed between the presence of <i>asa1</i> and <i>esp</i> virulence genes and tetracycline resistance (<i>P</i>=0.0305 and 0.0363, respectively). A significant correlation was also observed between the presence of virulence genes <i>gelE</i> and <i>asa1</i> and nitrofurantoin resistance (<i>P</i>=0.0175 and 0.0225, respectively) and ampicillin resistance (<i>P</i>=0.0005 and 0.0008, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the high levels of erythromycin resistance in <i>E. faecalis</i> and <i>E. faecium</i>, the demographic factors influencing the species distribution among patients, and the accumulation of multiple virulence genes in <i>E. faecalis.</i> The significant association of <i>gelE</i>, <i>asa1,</i> and <i>esp</i> virulence genes with drug resistance could explain the pathogenic success of <i>E. faecalis</i> and provides a guide for future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathogens\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668473/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3129439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3129439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:肠球菌具有重要的临床意义,因为它们对抗生素的耐药性越来越强,并且由于其毒力基因库而引起严重感染。在发展中国家,很少有研究检查可能显著影响患者预后的毒力因素。本研究描述了肯尼亚44株粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌临床分离株中5种关键肠球菌毒力基因gelE、asa、cylA、esp和hyl的耐药性特征和流行情况,以及它们与患者人口统计学和临床特征的关系。结果:所有的粪肠杆菌分离株均来自医院获得性皮肤和软组织感染。而粪肠球菌与社区获得性尿路感染有关。所有菌株均对红霉素耐药,而对四环素、左氧氟沙星、庆大霉素、氨苄西林、呋喃妥因和替柯planin敏感的菌株分别为11/44(27.5%)、25/44(56.8%)、28/44(63.6%)、37/44(84.1%)、40/44(90.0%)和43/44(97.5%)。所有分离株均对替加环素、万古霉素和利奈唑胺敏感。粪肠杆菌和粪肠杆菌的抗生素耐药谱差异不大。44株毒力基因中,gelE 27株(61.4%)、asa1 26株(59.1%)、esp 16株(36.3%)、cylA 11株(25.0%)、hyl 1株(2.3%)。72.9%的分离株有多个毒力基因,57%的分离株无毒力基因。hyl基因仅在粪肠杆菌中检测到,cylA和asa1基因仅在粪肠杆菌中检测到。asa1和esp毒力基因的存在与四环素耐药性显著相关(P分别为0.0305和0.0363)。毒力基因gelE和asa1的存在与呋喃醌耐药性(P分别为0.0175和0.0225)和氨苄西林耐药性(P分别为0.0005和0.0008)也有显著的相关性。结论:本研究突出了粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌对红霉素的高耐药水平,影响患者种群分布的人口统计学因素,以及粪肠球菌中多种毒力基因的积累。gelE、asa1和esp毒力基因与耐药的显著相关性可以解释粪肠杆菌致病成功的原因,并为今后的研究提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Determination of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Factors and Their Association with Clinical and Demographic Factors in Kenya.

Determination of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Factors and Their Association with Clinical and Demographic Factors in Kenya.

Determination of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Factors and Their Association with Clinical and Demographic Factors in Kenya.

Background: Enterococci are clinically significant because of their increasing antibiotic resistance and their ability to cause severe infections due to an arsenal of virulence genes. Few studies in the developing world have examined virulence factors that may significantly impact patient outcomes. This study describes the antimicrobial resistance profiles and prevalence of five key Enterococcal virulence genes gelE, asa, cylA, esp, and hyl in forty-four clinical Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium isolates in Kenya and their association with patients' demographic and clinical characteristics.

Results: All E. faecium isolates were obtained from hospital-acquired skin and soft tissue infections. While E. faecalis was associated with community-acquired urinary tract infections. All isolates were resistant to erythromycin, whereas 11/44 (27.5%), 25/44 (56.8%), 28/44 (63.6%), 37/44 (84.1%), 40/44 (90.0%), and 43/44 (97.5%) were susceptible to tetracycline, levofloxacin, gentamicin, ampicillin, nitrofurantoin, and teicoplanin, respectively. All isolates were susceptible to tigecycline, vancomycin, and linezolid. There was little difference in the antibiotic resistance profiles between E. faecalis and E. faecium. The prevalence of the virulence genes among the 44 isolates were 27 (61.4%) for gelE, 26 (59.1%) for asa1, 16 (36.3%) for esp, 11 (25.0%) for cylA, and 1 (2.3%) for hyl. 72.9% of E. faecalis isolates had multiple virulence genes compared to 57% of E. faecium isolates with no virulence genes. The hyl gene was only detected in E. faecium, while cylA and asa1 were only detected in E. faecalis. A significant correlation was observed between the presence of asa1 and esp virulence genes and tetracycline resistance (P=0.0305 and 0.0363, respectively). A significant correlation was also observed between the presence of virulence genes gelE and asa1 and nitrofurantoin resistance (P=0.0175 and 0.0225, respectively) and ampicillin resistance (P=0.0005 and 0.0008, respectively).

Conclusion: The study highlights the high levels of erythromycin resistance in E. faecalis and E. faecium, the demographic factors influencing the species distribution among patients, and the accumulation of multiple virulence genes in E. faecalis. The significant association of gelE, asa1, and esp virulence genes with drug resistance could explain the pathogenic success of E. faecalis and provides a guide for future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathogens
Journal of Pathogens MICROBIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信