维生素K拮抗剂和直接口服抗凝剂治疗GARFIELD-VTE的疗效比较,重点是癌症和肾脏疾病。

Sylvia Haas, Alfredo E Farjat, Karen Pieper, Walter Ageno, Pantep Angchaisuksiri, Henri Bounameaux, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Shinya Goto, Lorenzo Mantovani, Paolo Prandoni, Sebastian Schellong, Alexander G G Turpie, Jeffrey I Weitz, Peter MacCallum, Hugo Ten Cate, Elizaveta Panchenko, Marc Carrier, Carlos Jerjes-Sanchez, Harry Gibbs, Petr Jansky, Gloria Kayani, Ajay K Kakkar
{"title":"维生素K拮抗剂和直接口服抗凝剂治疗GARFIELD-VTE的疗效比较,重点是癌症和肾脏疾病。","authors":"Sylvia Haas,&nbsp;Alfredo E Farjat,&nbsp;Karen Pieper,&nbsp;Walter Ageno,&nbsp;Pantep Angchaisuksiri,&nbsp;Henri Bounameaux,&nbsp;Samuel Z Goldhaber,&nbsp;Shinya Goto,&nbsp;Lorenzo Mantovani,&nbsp;Paolo Prandoni,&nbsp;Sebastian Schellong,&nbsp;Alexander G G Turpie,&nbsp;Jeffrey I Weitz,&nbsp;Peter MacCallum,&nbsp;Hugo Ten Cate,&nbsp;Elizaveta Panchenko,&nbsp;Marc Carrier,&nbsp;Carlos Jerjes-Sanchez,&nbsp;Harry Gibbs,&nbsp;Petr Jansky,&nbsp;Gloria Kayani,&nbsp;Ajay K Kakkar","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) provide a safe, effective alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment, as shown via intention-to-treat comparative effectiveness analysis. However, on-treatment analysis is imperative in observational studies because anticoagulation choice and duration are at investigators' discretion. <b>Objectives</b>  The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of DOACs and VKAs on 12-month outcomes in VTE patients using on-treatment analysis. <b>Methods</b>  The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD - VTE (GARFIELD-VTE) is a world-wide, prospective, non-interventional study observing treatment of VTE in routine clinical practice. <b>Results</b>  In total, 8,034 patients received VKAs ( <i>n</i>  = 3,043, 37.9%) or DOACs ( <i>n</i>  = 4,991, 62.1%). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and follow-up bleeding events, and accounting for possible time-varying confounding, all-cause mortality was significantly lower with DOACs than VKAs (hazard ratio: 0.58 [95% confidence interval 0.42-0.79]). Furthermore, patients receiving VKAs were more likely to die of VTE complications (4.9 vs. 2.2%) or bleeding (4.9 vs. 0.0%). There was no significant difference in rates of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio: 0.74 [0.55-1.01]), major bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.76 [0.47-1.24]), or overall bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.87 [0.72-1.05]) with DOACs or VKAs. Unadjusted analyses suggested that VKA patients with active cancer or renal insufficiency were more likely to die than patients treated with DOAC (52.51 [37.33-73.86] vs. 26.52 [19.37-36.29] and 9.97 [7.51-13.23] vs. 4.70 [3.25-6.81] per 100 person-years, respectively). <b>Conclusion</b>  DOACs and VKAs had similar rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. However, DOACs were associated with reduced all-cause mortality and a lower likelihood of death from VTE or bleeding compared with VKAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22238,"journal":{"name":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":"e354-e364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633227/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On-treatment Comparative Effectiveness of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in GARFIELD-VTE, and Focus on Cancer and Renal Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia Haas,&nbsp;Alfredo E Farjat,&nbsp;Karen Pieper,&nbsp;Walter Ageno,&nbsp;Pantep Angchaisuksiri,&nbsp;Henri Bounameaux,&nbsp;Samuel Z Goldhaber,&nbsp;Shinya Goto,&nbsp;Lorenzo Mantovani,&nbsp;Paolo Prandoni,&nbsp;Sebastian Schellong,&nbsp;Alexander G G Turpie,&nbsp;Jeffrey I Weitz,&nbsp;Peter MacCallum,&nbsp;Hugo Ten Cate,&nbsp;Elizaveta Panchenko,&nbsp;Marc Carrier,&nbsp;Carlos Jerjes-Sanchez,&nbsp;Harry Gibbs,&nbsp;Petr Jansky,&nbsp;Gloria Kayani,&nbsp;Ajay K Kakkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1757744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) provide a safe, effective alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment, as shown via intention-to-treat comparative effectiveness analysis. However, on-treatment analysis is imperative in observational studies because anticoagulation choice and duration are at investigators' discretion. <b>Objectives</b>  The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of DOACs and VKAs on 12-month outcomes in VTE patients using on-treatment analysis. <b>Methods</b>  The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD - VTE (GARFIELD-VTE) is a world-wide, prospective, non-interventional study observing treatment of VTE in routine clinical practice. <b>Results</b>  In total, 8,034 patients received VKAs ( <i>n</i>  = 3,043, 37.9%) or DOACs ( <i>n</i>  = 4,991, 62.1%). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and follow-up bleeding events, and accounting for possible time-varying confounding, all-cause mortality was significantly lower with DOACs than VKAs (hazard ratio: 0.58 [95% confidence interval 0.42-0.79]). Furthermore, patients receiving VKAs were more likely to die of VTE complications (4.9 vs. 2.2%) or bleeding (4.9 vs. 0.0%). There was no significant difference in rates of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio: 0.74 [0.55-1.01]), major bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.76 [0.47-1.24]), or overall bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.87 [0.72-1.05]) with DOACs or VKAs. Unadjusted analyses suggested that VKA patients with active cancer or renal insufficiency were more likely to die than patients treated with DOAC (52.51 [37.33-73.86] vs. 26.52 [19.37-36.29] and 9.97 [7.51-13.23] vs. 4.70 [3.25-6.81] per 100 person-years, respectively). <b>Conclusion</b>  DOACs and VKAs had similar rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. However, DOACs were associated with reduced all-cause mortality and a lower likelihood of death from VTE or bleeding compared with VKAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e354-e364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633227/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

意向治疗对比效果分析显示,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)为静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)治疗提供了一种安全、有效的替代维生素K拮抗剂(vka)的方法。然而,在观察性研究中,治疗分析是必要的,因为抗凝剂的选择和持续时间由研究者自行决定。该研究的目的是通过治疗分析比较DOACs和vka对静脉血栓栓塞患者12个月预后的有效性。方法全球静脉血栓栓塞(GARFIELD-VTE)抗凝登记是一项全球性的、前瞻性的、非介入性研究,观察静脉血栓栓塞在常规临床实践中的治疗情况。结果共8034例患者接受了vka (n = 3043, 37.9%)或doac (n = 4991, 62.1%)。在调整基线特征和随访出血事件,并考虑到可能的时变混杂因素后,doac的全因死亡率显著低于vka(风险比:0.58[95%可信区间0.42-0.79])。此外,接受vka的患者更有可能死于静脉血栓栓塞并发症(4.9比2.2%)或出血(4.9比0.0%)。doac和vka在静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)复发率(风险比:0.74[0.55-1.01])、大出血(风险比:0.76[0.47-1.24])和整体出血(风险比:0.87[0.72-1.05])方面无显著差异。未经调整的分析显示,伴有活动性癌症或肾功能不全的VKA患者比DOAC治疗的患者更容易死亡(52.51 [37.33-73.86]vs. 26.52[19.37-36.29]和9.97 [7.51-13.23]vs. 4.70[3.25-6.81] / 100人年)。结论DOACs与vka的静脉血栓栓塞及大出血发生率相近。然而,与vka相比,doac与全因死亡率降低以及静脉血栓栓塞或出血死亡的可能性降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

On-treatment Comparative Effectiveness of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in GARFIELD-VTE, and Focus on Cancer and Renal Disease.

On-treatment Comparative Effectiveness of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in GARFIELD-VTE, and Focus on Cancer and Renal Disease.

On-treatment Comparative Effectiveness of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in GARFIELD-VTE, and Focus on Cancer and Renal Disease.

On-treatment Comparative Effectiveness of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in GARFIELD-VTE, and Focus on Cancer and Renal Disease.

Background  Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) provide a safe, effective alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment, as shown via intention-to-treat comparative effectiveness analysis. However, on-treatment analysis is imperative in observational studies because anticoagulation choice and duration are at investigators' discretion. Objectives  The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of DOACs and VKAs on 12-month outcomes in VTE patients using on-treatment analysis. Methods  The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD - VTE (GARFIELD-VTE) is a world-wide, prospective, non-interventional study observing treatment of VTE in routine clinical practice. Results  In total, 8,034 patients received VKAs ( n  = 3,043, 37.9%) or DOACs ( n  = 4,991, 62.1%). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and follow-up bleeding events, and accounting for possible time-varying confounding, all-cause mortality was significantly lower with DOACs than VKAs (hazard ratio: 0.58 [95% confidence interval 0.42-0.79]). Furthermore, patients receiving VKAs were more likely to die of VTE complications (4.9 vs. 2.2%) or bleeding (4.9 vs. 0.0%). There was no significant difference in rates of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio: 0.74 [0.55-1.01]), major bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.76 [0.47-1.24]), or overall bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.87 [0.72-1.05]) with DOACs or VKAs. Unadjusted analyses suggested that VKA patients with active cancer or renal insufficiency were more likely to die than patients treated with DOAC (52.51 [37.33-73.86] vs. 26.52 [19.37-36.29] and 9.97 [7.51-13.23] vs. 4.70 [3.25-6.81] per 100 person-years, respectively). Conclusion  DOACs and VKAs had similar rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. However, DOACs were associated with reduced all-cause mortality and a lower likelihood of death from VTE or bleeding compared with VKAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信