聚醚醚酮酮作为柱体材料的表面处理对使用两种树脂水泥的牙根剪切粘接强度的影响

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Masaaki Kasahara, Tomoko Someya, Masayuki Hattori
{"title":"聚醚醚酮酮作为柱体材料的表面处理对使用两种树脂水泥的牙根剪切粘接强度的影响","authors":"Masaaki Kasahara, Tomoko Someya, Masayuki Hattori","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b3608791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the effects of mechanical and chemical pretreatment of polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) on shear bond strength (SBS) to root dentin using two types of resin cement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 100 PEKK specimens were prepared and polished. Sixty specimens were mechanically treated by sandblasting (50-µm Al2O3 for 10 s at 0.2-0.25 MPa), and the remaining 40 were untreated. Self-adhesive resin cement and conventional resin cement were used. PEKK specimens bonded to root dentin using self-adhesive resin cement were classified into three groups by pretreatment method: (1) untreated PEKK, (2) mechanical pretreatment (sandblasted PEKK), and (3) both mechanical and chemical pretreatment (PEKK sandblasting as well as application of Scotchbond Universal; 3M Oral Care). Conventional resin cement was pretreated following the same steps (1-3) as those followed for self-adhesive specimens. Each group included 10 specimens. PEKK specimens after surface treatments were examined using SEM. SBS tests were performed using a universal testing machine, and data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed between cements with and without sandblasting. However, self-adhesive specimens with both mechanical and chemical pretreatments demonstrated higher SBS than other cements with or without pretreatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mechanical pretreatment by sandblasting did not improve the PEKK-root dentin SBS. However, combined mechanical (sandblasting) and chemical pretreatment (ScotchBond Universal) significantly improved the SBS between the PEKK and root dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"435-443"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Surface Treatments of Polyetherketoneketone as a Post Material on Shear Bond Strength to Root Dentin using Two Types of Resin Cement.\",\"authors\":\"Masaaki Kasahara, Tomoko Someya, Masayuki Hattori\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.jad.b3608791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the effects of mechanical and chemical pretreatment of polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) on shear bond strength (SBS) to root dentin using two types of resin cement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 100 PEKK specimens were prepared and polished. Sixty specimens were mechanically treated by sandblasting (50-µm Al2O3 for 10 s at 0.2-0.25 MPa), and the remaining 40 were untreated. Self-adhesive resin cement and conventional resin cement were used. PEKK specimens bonded to root dentin using self-adhesive resin cement were classified into three groups by pretreatment method: (1) untreated PEKK, (2) mechanical pretreatment (sandblasted PEKK), and (3) both mechanical and chemical pretreatment (PEKK sandblasting as well as application of Scotchbond Universal; 3M Oral Care). Conventional resin cement was pretreated following the same steps (1-3) as those followed for self-adhesive specimens. Each group included 10 specimens. PEKK specimens after surface treatments were examined using SEM. SBS tests were performed using a universal testing machine, and data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed between cements with and without sandblasting. However, self-adhesive specimens with both mechanical and chemical pretreatments demonstrated higher SBS than other cements with or without pretreatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mechanical pretreatment by sandblasting did not improve the PEKK-root dentin SBS. However, combined mechanical (sandblasting) and chemical pretreatment (ScotchBond Universal) significantly improved the SBS between the PEKK and root dentin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"435-443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3608791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3608791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究调查了聚醚醚酮酮(PEKK)的机械和化学预处理对使用两种树脂水泥的根牙本质剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响:共制备并抛光了 100 个 PEKK 试样。其中 60 个试样通过喷砂(50 微米的 Al2O3,10 秒,0.2-0.25 兆帕)进行机械处理,其余 40 个试样未经处理。使用了自粘树脂水泥和传统树脂水泥。按预处理方法将使用自粘树脂水门汀粘接到根部牙本质的 PEKK 试样分为三组:(1) 未经处理的 PEKK,(2) 机械预处理(喷砂处理 PEKK),(3) 机械和化学预处理(PEKK 喷砂处理以及使用思高万能胶;3M 口腔护理产品)。传统树脂水泥的预处理步骤(1-3)与自粘试样的步骤相同。每组包括 10 个试样。使用 SEM 对表面处理后的 PEKK 试样进行检查。使用万能试验机进行 SBS 测试,并使用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 多重比较试验对数据进行统计分析(P < 0.05):结果:喷砂和未喷砂的水泥之间没有明显差异。然而,经过机械和化学预处理的自粘试样比其他经过或未经过预处理的水泥具有更高的 SBS:结论:通过喷砂进行机械预处理并不能改善 PEKK-牙本质的 SBS。然而,机械预处理(喷砂)和化学预处理(思高邦通用水门汀)联合使用可显著改善 PEKK 与根部牙本质之间的 SBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Surface Treatments of Polyetherketoneketone as a Post Material on Shear Bond Strength to Root Dentin using Two Types of Resin Cement.

Purpose: This study investigated the effects of mechanical and chemical pretreatment of polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) on shear bond strength (SBS) to root dentin using two types of resin cement.

Materials and methods: A total of 100 PEKK specimens were prepared and polished. Sixty specimens were mechanically treated by sandblasting (50-µm Al2O3 for 10 s at 0.2-0.25 MPa), and the remaining 40 were untreated. Self-adhesive resin cement and conventional resin cement were used. PEKK specimens bonded to root dentin using self-adhesive resin cement were classified into three groups by pretreatment method: (1) untreated PEKK, (2) mechanical pretreatment (sandblasted PEKK), and (3) both mechanical and chemical pretreatment (PEKK sandblasting as well as application of Scotchbond Universal; 3M Oral Care). Conventional resin cement was pretreated following the same steps (1-3) as those followed for self-adhesive specimens. Each group included 10 specimens. PEKK specimens after surface treatments were examined using SEM. SBS tests were performed using a universal testing machine, and data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).

Results: No significant difference was observed between cements with and without sandblasting. However, self-adhesive specimens with both mechanical and chemical pretreatments demonstrated higher SBS than other cements with or without pretreatment.

Conclusion: Mechanical pretreatment by sandblasting did not improve the PEKK-root dentin SBS. However, combined mechanical (sandblasting) and chemical pretreatment (ScotchBond Universal) significantly improved the SBS between the PEKK and root dentin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信