自闭症患者对电子书与纸质书的叙事理解与参与。

IF 3.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments Pub Date : 2020-04-14 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2396941520917943
Bethany R Wainwright, Melissa L Allen, Kate Cain
{"title":"自闭症患者对电子书与纸质书的叙事理解与参与。","authors":"Bethany R Wainwright,&nbsp;Melissa L Allen,&nbsp;Kate Cain","doi":"10.1177/2396941520917943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Children with autism spectrum condition often have specific difficulties with narrative comprehension, a skill which has a strong association with both concurrent and longitudinal reading comprehension. A better understanding of narrative comprehension skills in autism spectrum condition has the potential to provide insight into potential later reading comprehension difficulties and inform early targeted intervention. In the current study, the main objective was to investigate how differences in the medium of story presentation (paper-book vs. e-book) and differences in story narration (adult narration vs. in-app narration) would influence narrative comprehension in general, and between groups (autism spectrum condition and a receptive language-matched control group). We were also interested in how task engagement (visual attention and communication) differed between group and conditions and whether task engagement was related to narrative comprehension.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty-two children with autism spectrum condition and 42 typically developing children were read a story either via a paper-book or an e-book with interactive and multimedia features. The e-book was either narrated by the experimenter (adult narrated iPad condition) or narrated by an in-app voiceover (e-book narrated iPad condition). Children's behaviour during storybook reading was video recorded and coded for engagement (visual attention and communication). They then completed two measures of narrative comprehension: multiple-choice questions (measuring recall of literal information) and a picture ordering task (measuring global story structure).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrary to predictions, we did not find any significant group or condition differences on either measure of narrative comprehension, and both groups demonstrated a similar level of narrative comprehension across the three conditions. We found differences in engagement between conditions for both groups, with greater visual attention in the e-book conditions compared to the paper-book condition. However, visual attention only significantly correlated with narrative comprehension for the typically developing group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, this study suggests that children with autism spectrum condition are just as able as language-matched peers to comprehend a narrative from storybooks. Presenting a story on an iPad e-book compared to a paper-book does not influence narrative comprehension, nor does adult narration of the story compared to in-app narration. However, on-task engagement is linked to narrative comprehension in typically developing children.<b>Implications:</b> Taken together, our findings suggest that e-books may be more successful than paper-based mediums at encouraging visual attention towards the story, but no better at supporting narrative comprehension and eliciting communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":36716,"journal":{"name":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","volume":" ","pages":"2396941520917943"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2396941520917943","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Narrative comprehension and engagement with e-books vs. paper-books in autism spectrum condition.\",\"authors\":\"Bethany R Wainwright,&nbsp;Melissa L Allen,&nbsp;Kate Cain\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2396941520917943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Children with autism spectrum condition often have specific difficulties with narrative comprehension, a skill which has a strong association with both concurrent and longitudinal reading comprehension. A better understanding of narrative comprehension skills in autism spectrum condition has the potential to provide insight into potential later reading comprehension difficulties and inform early targeted intervention. In the current study, the main objective was to investigate how differences in the medium of story presentation (paper-book vs. e-book) and differences in story narration (adult narration vs. in-app narration) would influence narrative comprehension in general, and between groups (autism spectrum condition and a receptive language-matched control group). We were also interested in how task engagement (visual attention and communication) differed between group and conditions and whether task engagement was related to narrative comprehension.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty-two children with autism spectrum condition and 42 typically developing children were read a story either via a paper-book or an e-book with interactive and multimedia features. The e-book was either narrated by the experimenter (adult narrated iPad condition) or narrated by an in-app voiceover (e-book narrated iPad condition). Children's behaviour during storybook reading was video recorded and coded for engagement (visual attention and communication). They then completed two measures of narrative comprehension: multiple-choice questions (measuring recall of literal information) and a picture ordering task (measuring global story structure).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrary to predictions, we did not find any significant group or condition differences on either measure of narrative comprehension, and both groups demonstrated a similar level of narrative comprehension across the three conditions. We found differences in engagement between conditions for both groups, with greater visual attention in the e-book conditions compared to the paper-book condition. However, visual attention only significantly correlated with narrative comprehension for the typically developing group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, this study suggests that children with autism spectrum condition are just as able as language-matched peers to comprehend a narrative from storybooks. Presenting a story on an iPad e-book compared to a paper-book does not influence narrative comprehension, nor does adult narration of the story compared to in-app narration. However, on-task engagement is linked to narrative comprehension in typically developing children.<b>Implications:</b> Taken together, our findings suggest that e-books may be more successful than paper-based mediums at encouraging visual attention towards the story, but no better at supporting narrative comprehension and eliciting communication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2396941520917943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2396941520917943\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941520917943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941520917943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景与目的:自闭症谱系儿童通常在叙事理解方面存在特殊困难,这一技能与并行阅读理解和纵向阅读理解都有很强的联系。更好地了解自闭症谱系条件下的叙事理解技能有可能为潜在的后期阅读理解困难提供洞察,并为早期有针对性的干预提供信息。在本研究中,主要目的是调查故事呈现媒介(纸质书与电子书)和故事叙述(成人叙述与应用程序内叙述)的差异如何影响叙事理解,以及不同群体(自闭症谱系条件和接受性语言匹配对照组)之间的差异。我们还对任务参与(视觉注意和沟通)在不同组和条件下的差异以及任务参与是否与叙事理解有关感兴趣。方法:选取42名自闭症儿童和42名正常发育儿童,分别通过纸质书或具有互动和多媒体功能的电子书阅读一个故事。电子书要么由实验人员解说(成人iPad解说),要么由应用内画外音解说(电子书iPad解说)。孩子们在阅读故事书时的行为被录像并编码为参与(视觉注意力和交流)。然后,他们完成了两项叙事理解测试:多项选择题(测量对文字信息的回忆)和图片排序任务(测量整体故事结构)。结果:与预测相反,我们没有发现任何显著的组或条件差异在叙事理解的任何测量,两组在三种情况下都表现出相似的叙事理解水平。我们发现两组人在不同条件下的参与程度有所不同,与纸质书条件相比,电子书条件下的视觉注意力更高。然而,视觉注意仅与典型发育组的叙事理解显著相关。结论:总的来说,这项研究表明,自闭症谱系儿童与语言匹配的同龄人一样能够理解故事书中的叙述。与纸质书相比,在iPad电子书上呈现故事不会影响叙事理解,成人叙事也不会影响应用内叙事。然而,在正常发育的儿童中,任务投入与叙事理解有关。启示:综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,电子书在鼓励读者对故事的视觉关注方面可能比纸质媒体更成功,但在支持叙事理解和引发交流方面并不比纸质媒体更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Narrative comprehension and engagement with e-books vs. paper-books in autism spectrum condition.

Narrative comprehension and engagement with e-books vs. paper-books in autism spectrum condition.

Narrative comprehension and engagement with e-books vs. paper-books in autism spectrum condition.

Narrative comprehension and engagement with e-books vs. paper-books in autism spectrum condition.

Background and aims: Children with autism spectrum condition often have specific difficulties with narrative comprehension, a skill which has a strong association with both concurrent and longitudinal reading comprehension. A better understanding of narrative comprehension skills in autism spectrum condition has the potential to provide insight into potential later reading comprehension difficulties and inform early targeted intervention. In the current study, the main objective was to investigate how differences in the medium of story presentation (paper-book vs. e-book) and differences in story narration (adult narration vs. in-app narration) would influence narrative comprehension in general, and between groups (autism spectrum condition and a receptive language-matched control group). We were also interested in how task engagement (visual attention and communication) differed between group and conditions and whether task engagement was related to narrative comprehension.

Method: Forty-two children with autism spectrum condition and 42 typically developing children were read a story either via a paper-book or an e-book with interactive and multimedia features. The e-book was either narrated by the experimenter (adult narrated iPad condition) or narrated by an in-app voiceover (e-book narrated iPad condition). Children's behaviour during storybook reading was video recorded and coded for engagement (visual attention and communication). They then completed two measures of narrative comprehension: multiple-choice questions (measuring recall of literal information) and a picture ordering task (measuring global story structure).

Results: Contrary to predictions, we did not find any significant group or condition differences on either measure of narrative comprehension, and both groups demonstrated a similar level of narrative comprehension across the three conditions. We found differences in engagement between conditions for both groups, with greater visual attention in the e-book conditions compared to the paper-book condition. However, visual attention only significantly correlated with narrative comprehension for the typically developing group.

Conclusion: Overall, this study suggests that children with autism spectrum condition are just as able as language-matched peers to comprehend a narrative from storybooks. Presenting a story on an iPad e-book compared to a paper-book does not influence narrative comprehension, nor does adult narration of the story compared to in-app narration. However, on-task engagement is linked to narrative comprehension in typically developing children.Implications: Taken together, our findings suggest that e-books may be more successful than paper-based mediums at encouraging visual attention towards the story, but no better at supporting narrative comprehension and eliciting communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信