急性、慢性和实验性肌肉骨骼疼痛状态的脑电图特征有差异吗?系统评价。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-14 DOI:10.1177/15500594221138292
Jerin Mathew, Tyson Michael Perez, Divya Bharatkumar Adhia, Dirk De Ridder, Ramakrishnan Mani
{"title":"急性、慢性和实验性肌肉骨骼疼痛状态的脑电图特征有差异吗?系统评价。","authors":"Jerin Mathew, Tyson Michael Perez, Divya Bharatkumar Adhia, Dirk De Ridder, Ramakrishnan Mani","doi":"10.1177/15500594221138292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electroencephalographic (EEG) alterations have been demonstrated in acute, chronic, and experimentally induced musculoskeletal (MSK) pain conditions. However, there is no cumulative evidence on the associated EEG characteristics differentiating acute, chronic, and experimentally induced musculoskeletal pain states, especially compared to healthy controls. The present systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) to review and summarize available evidence for cortical brain activity and connectivity alterations in acute, chronic, and experimentally induced MSK pain states. Five electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to 2022. A total of 3471 articles were screened, and 26 full articles (five studies on chronic pain and 21 studies on experimentally induced pain) were included for the final synthesis. Using the Downs and Black risk of assessment tool, 92% of the studies were assessed as low to moderate quality. The review identified a 'very low' level of evidence for the changes in EEG and subjective outcome measures for both chronic and experimentally induced MSK pain based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. Overall, the findings of this review indicate a trend toward decreased alpha and beta EEG power in evoked chronic clinical pain conditions and increased theta and alpha power in resting-state EEG recorded from chronic MSK pain conditions. EEG characteristics are unclear under experimentally induced pain conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10682,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is There a Difference in EEG Characteristics in Acute, Chronic, and Experimentally Induced Musculoskeletal Pain States? a Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jerin Mathew, Tyson Michael Perez, Divya Bharatkumar Adhia, Dirk De Ridder, Ramakrishnan Mani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15500594221138292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Electroencephalographic (EEG) alterations have been demonstrated in acute, chronic, and experimentally induced musculoskeletal (MSK) pain conditions. However, there is no cumulative evidence on the associated EEG characteristics differentiating acute, chronic, and experimentally induced musculoskeletal pain states, especially compared to healthy controls. The present systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) to review and summarize available evidence for cortical brain activity and connectivity alterations in acute, chronic, and experimentally induced MSK pain states. Five electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to 2022. A total of 3471 articles were screened, and 26 full articles (five studies on chronic pain and 21 studies on experimentally induced pain) were included for the final synthesis. Using the Downs and Black risk of assessment tool, 92% of the studies were assessed as low to moderate quality. The review identified a 'very low' level of evidence for the changes in EEG and subjective outcome measures for both chronic and experimentally induced MSK pain based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. Overall, the findings of this review indicate a trend toward decreased alpha and beta EEG power in evoked chronic clinical pain conditions and increased theta and alpha power in resting-state EEG recorded from chronic MSK pain conditions. EEG characteristics are unclear under experimentally induced pain conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221138292\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221138292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

脑电图(EEG)的改变已经在急性、慢性和实验诱导的肌肉骨骼(MSK)疼痛条件下得到证实。然而,特别是与健康对照相比,没有累积证据表明脑电图特征可以区分急性、慢性和实验诱导的肌肉骨骼疼痛状态。本系统综述是根据系统综述和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行的,以回顾和总结急性、慢性和实验诱导的MSK疼痛状态下大脑皮层活动和连通性改变的现有证据。从建立到2022年,系统地检索了五个电子数据库。共筛选3471篇文章,最终纳入26篇完整文章(5篇关于慢性疼痛的研究,21篇关于实验性疼痛的研究)进行最终合成。使用Downs和Black风险评估工具,92%的研究被评估为低到中等质量。根据推荐、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)标准,该综述确定了慢性和实验性MSK疼痛的脑电图和主观结果测量变化的“非常低”水平的证据。总的来说,本综述的研究结果表明,慢性临床疼痛条件下诱发的α和β脑电图功率下降,而慢性MSK疼痛条件下静息状态脑电图的θ和α功率增加。在实验诱导的疼痛条件下,脑电图特征尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is There a Difference in EEG Characteristics in Acute, Chronic, and Experimentally Induced Musculoskeletal Pain States? a Systematic Review.

Electroencephalographic (EEG) alterations have been demonstrated in acute, chronic, and experimentally induced musculoskeletal (MSK) pain conditions. However, there is no cumulative evidence on the associated EEG characteristics differentiating acute, chronic, and experimentally induced musculoskeletal pain states, especially compared to healthy controls. The present systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) to review and summarize available evidence for cortical brain activity and connectivity alterations in acute, chronic, and experimentally induced MSK pain states. Five electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to 2022. A total of 3471 articles were screened, and 26 full articles (five studies on chronic pain and 21 studies on experimentally induced pain) were included for the final synthesis. Using the Downs and Black risk of assessment tool, 92% of the studies were assessed as low to moderate quality. The review identified a 'very low' level of evidence for the changes in EEG and subjective outcome measures for both chronic and experimentally induced MSK pain based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. Overall, the findings of this review indicate a trend toward decreased alpha and beta EEG power in evoked chronic clinical pain conditions and increased theta and alpha power in resting-state EEG recorded from chronic MSK pain conditions. EEG characteristics are unclear under experimentally induced pain conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical EEG and Neuroscience conveys clinically relevant research and development in electroencephalography and neuroscience. Original articles on any aspect of clinical neurophysiology or related work in allied fields are invited for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信