年龄相关性黄斑变性护理中患者与医护人员共同决策的观点:一项质性研究

IF 2.4
Mariska Scheffer, Juliane Menting, Ruud Roodbeen, Sandra van Dulmen, Manon van Hecke, Reinier Schlingemann, Ruth van Nispen, Hennie Boeije
{"title":"年龄相关性黄斑变性护理中患者与医护人员共同决策的观点:一项质性研究","authors":"Mariska Scheffer,&nbsp;Juliane Menting,&nbsp;Ruud Roodbeen,&nbsp;Sandra van Dulmen,&nbsp;Manon van Hecke,&nbsp;Reinier Schlingemann,&nbsp;Ruth van Nispen,&nbsp;Hennie Boeije","doi":"10.1111/opo.13016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the principal causes of irreversible visual impairment in the older adult population. Recent evidence indicates that there are signs of undertreatment and overtreatment, underdiagnosis and insufficient information provision in AMD care. Shared decision-making (SDM) can aid information sharing between patients and health professionals and enhances high-quality care. This research aimed to gain insight into patients' and professionals' views on SDM in AMD care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients with AMD and 19 health professionals in June and July 2020. Participants were recruited through hospitals, professional and patient associations and (social) networks. Sample representativeness was ensured in terms of sociodemographic and disease characteristics for patients, and profession-related characteristics for health professionals. Interviews were analysed according to a predetermined coding framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although SDM is receiving attention in AMD care, health professionals and patients experienced barriers in making shared decisions. The most common barriers reported included limitations in treatment options, time constraints, strict treatment guidelines and patients' comorbidity. Furthermore, most patients indicated that they were not (fully) informed about all aspects of AMD trajectory, such as the possibility to discontinue therapy or the long-term and invasive character of treatment. Some patients expressed the need for a more empathic and person-centred communication style from their health professional.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concerns raised by patients and health professionals suggest that there is room for improvement in delivery of SDM in AMD care. Findings from this study indicate that information provision and communication can be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":"1015-1022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' and health professionals' views on shared decision-making in age-related macular degeneration care: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Mariska Scheffer,&nbsp;Juliane Menting,&nbsp;Ruud Roodbeen,&nbsp;Sandra van Dulmen,&nbsp;Manon van Hecke,&nbsp;Reinier Schlingemann,&nbsp;Ruth van Nispen,&nbsp;Hennie Boeije\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the principal causes of irreversible visual impairment in the older adult population. Recent evidence indicates that there are signs of undertreatment and overtreatment, underdiagnosis and insufficient information provision in AMD care. Shared decision-making (SDM) can aid information sharing between patients and health professionals and enhances high-quality care. This research aimed to gain insight into patients' and professionals' views on SDM in AMD care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients with AMD and 19 health professionals in June and July 2020. Participants were recruited through hospitals, professional and patient associations and (social) networks. Sample representativeness was ensured in terms of sociodemographic and disease characteristics for patients, and profession-related characteristics for health professionals. Interviews were analysed according to a predetermined coding framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although SDM is receiving attention in AMD care, health professionals and patients experienced barriers in making shared decisions. The most common barriers reported included limitations in treatment options, time constraints, strict treatment guidelines and patients' comorbidity. Furthermore, most patients indicated that they were not (fully) informed about all aspects of AMD trajectory, such as the possibility to discontinue therapy or the long-term and invasive character of treatment. Some patients expressed the need for a more empathic and person-centred communication style from their health professional.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concerns raised by patients and health professionals suggest that there is room for improvement in delivery of SDM in AMD care. Findings from this study indicate that information provision and communication can be improved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1015-1022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是老年人不可逆视力损害的主要原因之一。最近的证据表明,在AMD护理中存在治疗不足和过度治疗、诊断不足和信息提供不足的迹象。共享决策(SDM)有助于患者和卫生专业人员之间的信息共享,并提高高质量的护理。本研究旨在了解患者和专业人士对AMD护理中SDM的看法。方法:于2020年6月和7月对20例AMD患者和19名卫生专业人员进行半结构化访谈。参与者是通过医院、专业和患者协会以及(社会)网络招募的。在患者的社会人口学和疾病特征以及卫生专业人员的职业相关特征方面,确保了样本的代表性。访谈根据预定的编码框架进行分析。结果:尽管SDM在AMD护理中受到重视,但卫生专业人员和患者在共同决策方面存在障碍。最常见的障碍包括治疗选择的限制、时间限制、严格的治疗指南和患者的合并症。此外,大多数患者表示,他们没有(完全)了解AMD发展轨迹的所有方面,例如停止治疗的可能性或治疗的长期性和侵入性。一些患者表示,他们的医疗专业人员需要一种更加共情和以人为本的沟通方式。结论:患者和卫生专业人员提出的担忧表明,在AMD护理中,SDM的交付有改进的空间。本研究结果显示,资讯的提供与沟通是可以改善的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' and health professionals' views on shared decision-making in age-related macular degeneration care: A qualitative study.

Background: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the principal causes of irreversible visual impairment in the older adult population. Recent evidence indicates that there are signs of undertreatment and overtreatment, underdiagnosis and insufficient information provision in AMD care. Shared decision-making (SDM) can aid information sharing between patients and health professionals and enhances high-quality care. This research aimed to gain insight into patients' and professionals' views on SDM in AMD care.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients with AMD and 19 health professionals in June and July 2020. Participants were recruited through hospitals, professional and patient associations and (social) networks. Sample representativeness was ensured in terms of sociodemographic and disease characteristics for patients, and profession-related characteristics for health professionals. Interviews were analysed according to a predetermined coding framework.

Results: Although SDM is receiving attention in AMD care, health professionals and patients experienced barriers in making shared decisions. The most common barriers reported included limitations in treatment options, time constraints, strict treatment guidelines and patients' comorbidity. Furthermore, most patients indicated that they were not (fully) informed about all aspects of AMD trajectory, such as the possibility to discontinue therapy or the long-term and invasive character of treatment. Some patients expressed the need for a more empathic and person-centred communication style from their health professional.

Conclusion: The concerns raised by patients and health professionals suggest that there is room for improvement in delivery of SDM in AMD care. Findings from this study indicate that information provision and communication can be improved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信