胞嘧啶和腺嘌呤碱基编辑器细胞周期依赖性的研究。

IF 4.9 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in genome editing Pub Date : 2022-07-14 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgeed.2022.923718
Cameron A Burnett, Ashley T Wong, Carlos A Vasquez, Colleen A McHugh, Gene W Yeo, Alexis C Komor
{"title":"胞嘧啶和腺嘌呤碱基编辑器细胞周期依赖性的研究。","authors":"Cameron A Burnett,&nbsp;Ashley T Wong,&nbsp;Carlos A Vasquez,&nbsp;Colleen A McHugh,&nbsp;Gene W Yeo,&nbsp;Alexis C Komor","doi":"10.3389/fgeed.2022.923718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Base editors (BEs) are genome editing agents that install point mutations with high efficiency and specificity. Due to their reliance on uracil and inosine DNA damage intermediates (rather than double-strand DNA breaks, or DSBs), it has been hypothesized that BEs rely on more ubiquitous DNA repair pathways than DSB-reliant genome editing methods, which require processes that are only active during certain phases of the cell cycle. We report here the first systematic study of the cell cycle-dependence of base editing using cell synchronization experiments. We find that nickase-derived BEs (which introduce DNA backbone nicks opposite the uracil or inosine base) function independently of the cell cycle, while non-nicking BEs are highly dependent on S-phase (DNA synthesis phase). We found that synchronization in G1 (growth phase) during the process of cytosine base editing causes significant increases in C•G to A•T \"byproduct\" introduction rates, which can be leveraged to discover new strategies for precise C•G to A•T base editing. We observe that endogenous expression levels of DNA damage repair pathways are sufficient to process base editing intermediates into desired editing outcomes, and the process of base editing does not significantly perturb transcription levels. Overall, our study provides mechanistic data demonstrating the robustness of nickase-derived BEs for performing genome editing across the cell cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":73086,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in genome editing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9333457/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of the Cell Cycle Dependence of Cytosine and Adenine Base Editors.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron A Burnett,&nbsp;Ashley T Wong,&nbsp;Carlos A Vasquez,&nbsp;Colleen A McHugh,&nbsp;Gene W Yeo,&nbsp;Alexis C Komor\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgeed.2022.923718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Base editors (BEs) are genome editing agents that install point mutations with high efficiency and specificity. Due to their reliance on uracil and inosine DNA damage intermediates (rather than double-strand DNA breaks, or DSBs), it has been hypothesized that BEs rely on more ubiquitous DNA repair pathways than DSB-reliant genome editing methods, which require processes that are only active during certain phases of the cell cycle. We report here the first systematic study of the cell cycle-dependence of base editing using cell synchronization experiments. We find that nickase-derived BEs (which introduce DNA backbone nicks opposite the uracil or inosine base) function independently of the cell cycle, while non-nicking BEs are highly dependent on S-phase (DNA synthesis phase). We found that synchronization in G1 (growth phase) during the process of cytosine base editing causes significant increases in C•G to A•T \\\"byproduct\\\" introduction rates, which can be leveraged to discover new strategies for precise C•G to A•T base editing. We observe that endogenous expression levels of DNA damage repair pathways are sufficient to process base editing intermediates into desired editing outcomes, and the process of base editing does not significantly perturb transcription levels. Overall, our study provides mechanistic data demonstrating the robustness of nickase-derived BEs for performing genome editing across the cell cycle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in genome editing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9333457/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in genome editing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2022.923718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in genome editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2022.923718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

碱基编辑器(BEs)是一种高效率、特异性安装点突变的基因组编辑试剂。由于它们依赖于尿嘧啶和肌苷DNA损伤中间体(而不是双链DNA断裂或dsb),因此有人假设,与依赖于dsb的基因组编辑方法相比,BEs依赖于更普遍的DNA修复途径,后者需要仅在细胞周期的某些阶段活跃的过程。我们在这里报告了使用细胞同步实验对碱基编辑的细胞周期依赖性的第一个系统研究。我们发现,缺口酶衍生的BEs(引入与尿嘧啶或肌苷碱基相反的DNA主干缺口)的功能独立于细胞周期,而非缺口的BEs高度依赖于s期(DNA合成期)。我们发现胞嘧啶碱基编辑过程中G1(生长阶段)的同步导致C•G到A•T“副产物”引入率显著增加,这可以用来发现精确的C•G到A•T碱基编辑的新策略。我们观察到DNA损伤修复途径的内源性表达水平足以将碱基编辑中间体加工成所需的编辑结果,并且碱基编辑过程不会显著干扰转录水平。总的来说,我们的研究提供了机制数据,证明了镍酶衍生的BEs在整个细胞周期中进行基因组编辑的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Examination of the Cell Cycle Dependence of Cytosine and Adenine Base Editors.

Examination of the Cell Cycle Dependence of Cytosine and Adenine Base Editors.

Examination of the Cell Cycle Dependence of Cytosine and Adenine Base Editors.

Examination of the Cell Cycle Dependence of Cytosine and Adenine Base Editors.

Base editors (BEs) are genome editing agents that install point mutations with high efficiency and specificity. Due to their reliance on uracil and inosine DNA damage intermediates (rather than double-strand DNA breaks, or DSBs), it has been hypothesized that BEs rely on more ubiquitous DNA repair pathways than DSB-reliant genome editing methods, which require processes that are only active during certain phases of the cell cycle. We report here the first systematic study of the cell cycle-dependence of base editing using cell synchronization experiments. We find that nickase-derived BEs (which introduce DNA backbone nicks opposite the uracil or inosine base) function independently of the cell cycle, while non-nicking BEs are highly dependent on S-phase (DNA synthesis phase). We found that synchronization in G1 (growth phase) during the process of cytosine base editing causes significant increases in C•G to A•T "byproduct" introduction rates, which can be leveraged to discover new strategies for precise C•G to A•T base editing. We observe that endogenous expression levels of DNA damage repair pathways are sufficient to process base editing intermediates into desired editing outcomes, and the process of base editing does not significantly perturb transcription levels. Overall, our study provides mechanistic data demonstrating the robustness of nickase-derived BEs for performing genome editing across the cell cycle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信