下颌骨骨折的回顾性临床研究。

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Seungjin Cha, Gaeun Park, Baek-Soo Lee, Yong-Dae Kwon, Byung-Joon Choi, Jung-Woo Lee, Junho Jung, Jooyoung Ohe
{"title":"下颌骨骨折的回顾性临床研究。","authors":"Seungjin Cha,&nbsp;Gaeun Park,&nbsp;Baek-Soo Lee,&nbsp;Yong-Dae Kwon,&nbsp;Byung-Joon Choi,&nbsp;Jung-Woo Lee,&nbsp;Junho Jung,&nbsp;Jooyoung Ohe","doi":"10.1186/s40902-022-00365-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As society becomes more complex, the incidence of mandibular fractures is increasing. This study aimed to analyze the incidence and type and identify etiological factors of mandibular fractures to use them in future treatments.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data were collected from 224 patients who visited the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery at the Kyung Hee Medical Center dental hospital during a 6-year period (2016 to 2021). A logistic regression model was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a total of 224 patients, 362 fractures were appeared. The average age of the patients was 34.1 years, with the highest incidence in the 20s. And the ratio between male and female was 4.09:1. Symphysis fractures were the most prevalent of all patients (52.7%), followed by unilateral condyle (37.1%), angle (36.2%), bilateral condyle (9.4%), body (8%), and coronoid (2.2%). The most common cause of fracture was daily-life activity (57.6%), followed by violence (30.4%), traffic accidents (8.5%), and syncope (3.6%). Patients with symphysis fracture were at low risk (OR < 1) of angle, body, and unilateral condyle fractures. Similarly, patients with unilateral fracture were at low risk (OR < 1) of symphysis, angle, body, and others site fractures. In contrast, patient with bilateral condyle fracture were at high risk (OR > 1) of coronoid fractures. And younger patients were high risk of mandibular angle fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through this study, it was confirmed that etiological factors of mandibular fractures were like those of previous studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628403/pdf/","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective clinical study of mandible fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Seungjin Cha,&nbsp;Gaeun Park,&nbsp;Baek-Soo Lee,&nbsp;Yong-Dae Kwon,&nbsp;Byung-Joon Choi,&nbsp;Jung-Woo Lee,&nbsp;Junho Jung,&nbsp;Jooyoung Ohe\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40902-022-00365-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As society becomes more complex, the incidence of mandibular fractures is increasing. This study aimed to analyze the incidence and type and identify etiological factors of mandibular fractures to use them in future treatments.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data were collected from 224 patients who visited the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery at the Kyung Hee Medical Center dental hospital during a 6-year period (2016 to 2021). A logistic regression model was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a total of 224 patients, 362 fractures were appeared. The average age of the patients was 34.1 years, with the highest incidence in the 20s. And the ratio between male and female was 4.09:1. Symphysis fractures were the most prevalent of all patients (52.7%), followed by unilateral condyle (37.1%), angle (36.2%), bilateral condyle (9.4%), body (8%), and coronoid (2.2%). The most common cause of fracture was daily-life activity (57.6%), followed by violence (30.4%), traffic accidents (8.5%), and syncope (3.6%). Patients with symphysis fracture were at low risk (OR < 1) of angle, body, and unilateral condyle fractures. Similarly, patients with unilateral fracture were at low risk (OR < 1) of symphysis, angle, body, and others site fractures. In contrast, patient with bilateral condyle fracture were at high risk (OR > 1) of coronoid fractures. And younger patients were high risk of mandibular angle fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through this study, it was confirmed that etiological factors of mandibular fractures were like those of previous studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628403/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00365-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00365-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

背景:随着社会的日益复杂,下颌骨骨折的发生率越来越高。本研究旨在分析下颌骨骨折的发生率、类型及病因,为今后的治疗提供参考。材料与方法:收集2016 - 2021年6年间在庆熙医疗中心口腔医院口腔颌面外科就诊的224例患者的数据。采用logistic回归模型对数据进行分析。结果:224例患者共发生骨折362例。患者平均年龄34.1岁,20多岁发病率最高。男女比例为4.09:1。联合骨折发生率最高(52.7%),其次为单侧髁(37.1%)、角骨折(36.2%)、双侧髁(9.4%)、体骨折(8%)和冠状骨折(2.2%)。最常见的骨折原因是日常生活活动(57.6%),其次是暴力(30.4%)、交通事故(8.5%)和晕厥(3.6%)。联合骨折患者发生角骨折、体骨折和单侧髁骨折的风险较低(OR < 1)。同样,单侧骨折患者联合、角、体等部位骨折的风险较低(OR < 1)。双侧髁骨折患者发生冠状突骨折的风险较高(OR > 1)。年轻患者是下颌角骨折的高危人群。结论:通过本研究,确认下颌骨骨折的病因与以往研究相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Retrospective clinical study of mandible fractures.

Retrospective clinical study of mandible fractures.

Retrospective clinical study of mandible fractures.

Retrospective clinical study of mandible fractures.

Background: As society becomes more complex, the incidence of mandibular fractures is increasing. This study aimed to analyze the incidence and type and identify etiological factors of mandibular fractures to use them in future treatments.

Material and methods: Data were collected from 224 patients who visited the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery at the Kyung Hee Medical Center dental hospital during a 6-year period (2016 to 2021). A logistic regression model was used for data analysis.

Results: In a total of 224 patients, 362 fractures were appeared. The average age of the patients was 34.1 years, with the highest incidence in the 20s. And the ratio between male and female was 4.09:1. Symphysis fractures were the most prevalent of all patients (52.7%), followed by unilateral condyle (37.1%), angle (36.2%), bilateral condyle (9.4%), body (8%), and coronoid (2.2%). The most common cause of fracture was daily-life activity (57.6%), followed by violence (30.4%), traffic accidents (8.5%), and syncope (3.6%). Patients with symphysis fracture were at low risk (OR < 1) of angle, body, and unilateral condyle fractures. Similarly, patients with unilateral fracture were at low risk (OR < 1) of symphysis, angle, body, and others site fractures. In contrast, patient with bilateral condyle fracture were at high risk (OR > 1) of coronoid fractures. And younger patients were high risk of mandibular angle fractures.

Conclusion: Through this study, it was confirmed that etiological factors of mandibular fractures were like those of previous studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信