用BookRoll编排的学习对话:对本科物理课程的参与和学习的影响。

IF 3.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Vijayanandhini Kannan, Jayakrishnan M Warriem, Rwitajit Majumdar, Hiroaki Ogata
{"title":"用BookRoll编排的学习对话:对本科物理课程的参与和学习的影响。","authors":"Vijayanandhini Kannan,&nbsp;Jayakrishnan M Warriem,&nbsp;Rwitajit Majumdar,&nbsp;Hiroaki Ogata","doi":"10.1186/s41039-022-00203-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With COVID-19 pandemic forcing academic institutions to shift to emergency remote teaching (ERT), teachers worldwide are attempting several strategies to engage their learners. Even though existing research in online learning suggests that effectiveness of the online session is more dependent on pedagogical design rather than technology feature, teachers may still focus on the intricacies of the technology. In this paper, we present the evolution of an active learning pedagogy, supported by technology (eBook reader-BookRoll, Analytics Dashboard-LAViEW), for an undergraduate physics classroom across a semester that was affected by the lockdown due to pandemic. The technology-enhanced pedagogy evolved in three phases-technology used in \"Content Focus\" mode, technology used in \"Problem Focus\" mode and technology used in \"Learning Dialogue Focus\" mode. The entire activities were designed and implemented within the technology-enhanced and evidence-based education and learning (TEEL) ecosystem, which supported integration of learning technologies with analytics system. Comparison of the student's learning logs indicated that there was a sustained engagement in the learning activities conducted during the blended (before lockdown) and online mode (during lockdown). We had conducted one-way ANOVA to compare the post-test scores for each teaching phase and found statistically significant differences in the latter phases. A preliminary qualitative analysis of the learner artifacts generated as memos in BookRoll during each phase revealed that students were posing conceptual clarifications during the latter phases. These were also having greater alignment with the session agenda and showed construction of new knowledge based on the seed knowledge provided during the instructor-learner interaction sessions. The study provides key insights into how reflection and practice by both learner and teacher improves the acceptance of technology-enabled pedagogy.</p>","PeriodicalId":37055,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":" ","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning dialogs orchestrated with BookRoll: effects on engagement and learning in an undergraduate physics course.\",\"authors\":\"Vijayanandhini Kannan,&nbsp;Jayakrishnan M Warriem,&nbsp;Rwitajit Majumdar,&nbsp;Hiroaki Ogata\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41039-022-00203-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With COVID-19 pandemic forcing academic institutions to shift to emergency remote teaching (ERT), teachers worldwide are attempting several strategies to engage their learners. Even though existing research in online learning suggests that effectiveness of the online session is more dependent on pedagogical design rather than technology feature, teachers may still focus on the intricacies of the technology. In this paper, we present the evolution of an active learning pedagogy, supported by technology (eBook reader-BookRoll, Analytics Dashboard-LAViEW), for an undergraduate physics classroom across a semester that was affected by the lockdown due to pandemic. The technology-enhanced pedagogy evolved in three phases-technology used in \\\"Content Focus\\\" mode, technology used in \\\"Problem Focus\\\" mode and technology used in \\\"Learning Dialogue Focus\\\" mode. The entire activities were designed and implemented within the technology-enhanced and evidence-based education and learning (TEEL) ecosystem, which supported integration of learning technologies with analytics system. Comparison of the student's learning logs indicated that there was a sustained engagement in the learning activities conducted during the blended (before lockdown) and online mode (during lockdown). We had conducted one-way ANOVA to compare the post-test scores for each teaching phase and found statistically significant differences in the latter phases. A preliminary qualitative analysis of the learner artifacts generated as memos in BookRoll during each phase revealed that students were posing conceptual clarifications during the latter phases. These were also having greater alignment with the session agenda and showed construction of new knowledge based on the seed knowledge provided during the instructor-learner interaction sessions. The study provides key insights into how reflection and practice by both learner and teacher improves the acceptance of technology-enabled pedagogy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306417/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00203-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00203-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着COVID-19大流行迫使学术机构转向紧急远程教学(ERT),世界各地的教师正在尝试几种策略来吸引学习者。尽管现有的在线学习研究表明,在线课程的有效性更多地取决于教学设计,而不是技术特征,但教师可能仍然会关注技术的复杂性。在本文中,我们介绍了一种主动学习教学法的演变,该教学法由技术支持(电子书阅读器- bookroll,分析仪表板- laview),用于受疫情封锁影响的一个学期的本科物理教室。技术增强教学法的发展经历了三个阶段:“内容聚焦”模式下的技术、“问题聚焦”模式下的技术和“学习对话聚焦”模式下的技术。整个活动都是在技术增强和基于证据的教育和学习(TEEL)生态系统中设计和实施的,该生态系统支持学习技术与分析系统的集成。对学生学习日志的比较表明,在混合模式(封锁前)和在线模式(封锁期间)期间,学生持续参与学习活动。我们进行了单因素方差分析来比较每个教学阶段的测试后分数,发现在后面的阶段有统计学上的显著差异。对每个阶段在BookRoll中作为备忘录生成的学习者工件的初步定性分析表明,学生在后期阶段提出概念澄清。这些也与会议议程更加一致,并显示了基于教师-学习者互动会议期间提供的种子知识的新知识的构建。该研究为学习者和教师的反思和实践如何提高技术支持教学法的接受度提供了关键见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Learning dialogs orchestrated with BookRoll: effects on engagement and learning in an undergraduate physics course.

Learning dialogs orchestrated with BookRoll: effects on engagement and learning in an undergraduate physics course.

Learning dialogs orchestrated with BookRoll: effects on engagement and learning in an undergraduate physics course.

Learning dialogs orchestrated with BookRoll: effects on engagement and learning in an undergraduate physics course.

With COVID-19 pandemic forcing academic institutions to shift to emergency remote teaching (ERT), teachers worldwide are attempting several strategies to engage their learners. Even though existing research in online learning suggests that effectiveness of the online session is more dependent on pedagogical design rather than technology feature, teachers may still focus on the intricacies of the technology. In this paper, we present the evolution of an active learning pedagogy, supported by technology (eBook reader-BookRoll, Analytics Dashboard-LAViEW), for an undergraduate physics classroom across a semester that was affected by the lockdown due to pandemic. The technology-enhanced pedagogy evolved in three phases-technology used in "Content Focus" mode, technology used in "Problem Focus" mode and technology used in "Learning Dialogue Focus" mode. The entire activities were designed and implemented within the technology-enhanced and evidence-based education and learning (TEEL) ecosystem, which supported integration of learning technologies with analytics system. Comparison of the student's learning logs indicated that there was a sustained engagement in the learning activities conducted during the blended (before lockdown) and online mode (during lockdown). We had conducted one-way ANOVA to compare the post-test scores for each teaching phase and found statistically significant differences in the latter phases. A preliminary qualitative analysis of the learner artifacts generated as memos in BookRoll during each phase revealed that students were posing conceptual clarifications during the latter phases. These were also having greater alignment with the session agenda and showed construction of new knowledge based on the seed knowledge provided during the instructor-learner interaction sessions. The study provides key insights into how reflection and practice by both learner and teacher improves the acceptance of technology-enabled pedagogy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信