了解贝尔祖替芬对VHL患者治疗策略的影响。

IF 1.9 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL Pub Date : 2022-09-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.15586/jkcvhl.v9i3.245
Aileen Arevalo, Neal Patel, Peter Muraki, Shinji Ohtake, Gennady Bratslavsky, Chandra Clark, Joshua Mann, Othon Iliopoulos, Eric Jonasch, Ramaprasad Srinivasan, Brian Shuch
{"title":"了解贝尔祖替芬对VHL患者治疗策略的影响。","authors":"Aileen Arevalo,&nbsp;Neal Patel,&nbsp;Peter Muraki,&nbsp;Shinji Ohtake,&nbsp;Gennady Bratslavsky,&nbsp;Chandra Clark,&nbsp;Joshua Mann,&nbsp;Othon Iliopoulos,&nbsp;Eric Jonasch,&nbsp;Ramaprasad Srinivasan,&nbsp;Brian Shuch","doi":"10.15586/jkcvhl.v9i3.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Belzutifan was recently approved for the management of Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL). Given the morbidity of recurrent treatment, systemic therapy to reduce or eliminate the need for surgery has been long-awaited. Herein, we sought to gain insight about future utilization by surveying VHL kidney cancer experts in the United States. A survey developed by members of the VHL Alliance (VHLA) Clinical Advisory Council was distributed to kidney cancer providers at VHLA and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) centers. Surveys were administered on a secure web-based platform. A total of 60 respondents from 29 institutions participated. Urologists (50%) and medical oncologists (43%) represented the majority of participants. The majority (98%) of respondents anticipated that belzutifan's approval would significantly change the current treatment landscape. Most reported that therapy should be continuous (76%). There was a difference in willingness to prescribe belzutifan by specialty (38% of urologists vs 91% of medical oncologists (P = 0.02)). In individuals with renal tumors <3 cm, 36% would still recommend surveillance, while 36% would initiate belzutifan to prevent growth. In those with multifocal renal lesions and growth of a solitary tumor on belzutifan, 50% would proceed with only treatment of that site. In conclusion, VHL kidney cancer specialists anticipate a paradigm shift with the approval of belzutifan. Provider roles may change with movement away from surgical management. Opinions on treatment indications, such as when to initiate therapy and how to best salvage, vary widely and therefore collaborative efforts among experts may assist in the development of new clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":44291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","volume":" ","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551368/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Impact of Belzutifan on Treatment Strategies for Patients with VHL.\",\"authors\":\"Aileen Arevalo,&nbsp;Neal Patel,&nbsp;Peter Muraki,&nbsp;Shinji Ohtake,&nbsp;Gennady Bratslavsky,&nbsp;Chandra Clark,&nbsp;Joshua Mann,&nbsp;Othon Iliopoulos,&nbsp;Eric Jonasch,&nbsp;Ramaprasad Srinivasan,&nbsp;Brian Shuch\",\"doi\":\"10.15586/jkcvhl.v9i3.245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Belzutifan was recently approved for the management of Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL). Given the morbidity of recurrent treatment, systemic therapy to reduce or eliminate the need for surgery has been long-awaited. Herein, we sought to gain insight about future utilization by surveying VHL kidney cancer experts in the United States. A survey developed by members of the VHL Alliance (VHLA) Clinical Advisory Council was distributed to kidney cancer providers at VHLA and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) centers. Surveys were administered on a secure web-based platform. A total of 60 respondents from 29 institutions participated. Urologists (50%) and medical oncologists (43%) represented the majority of participants. The majority (98%) of respondents anticipated that belzutifan's approval would significantly change the current treatment landscape. Most reported that therapy should be continuous (76%). There was a difference in willingness to prescribe belzutifan by specialty (38% of urologists vs 91% of medical oncologists (P = 0.02)). In individuals with renal tumors <3 cm, 36% would still recommend surveillance, while 36% would initiate belzutifan to prevent growth. In those with multifocal renal lesions and growth of a solitary tumor on belzutifan, 50% would proceed with only treatment of that site. In conclusion, VHL kidney cancer specialists anticipate a paradigm shift with the approval of belzutifan. Provider roles may change with movement away from surgical management. Opinions on treatment indications, such as when to initiate therapy and how to best salvage, vary widely and therefore collaborative efforts among experts may assist in the development of new clinical guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"41-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551368/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v9i3.245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v9i3.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Belzutifan最近被批准用于治疗Von hipel - lindau病(VHL)。鉴于复发治疗的发病率,减少或消除手术需要的全身治疗已被期待已久。在此,我们试图通过调查美国的VHL肾癌专家来了解未来的使用情况。由VHL联盟(VHLA)临床咨询委员会成员开发的一项调查被分发给VHLA和国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)中心的肾癌提供者。调查是在一个安全的网络平台上进行的。共有来自29个机构的60名受访者参与了调查。泌尿科医生(50%)和内科肿瘤科医生(43%)代表了大多数参与者。大多数(98%)受访者预计,贝祖替芬的批准将显著改变目前的治疗格局。大多数报告说治疗应该持续(76%)。不同专科医师开贝祖替芬的意愿存在差异(38%的泌尿科医师对91%的肿瘤内科医师(P = 0.02))。在肾肿瘤患者中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the Impact of Belzutifan on Treatment Strategies for Patients with VHL.

Belzutifan was recently approved for the management of Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL). Given the morbidity of recurrent treatment, systemic therapy to reduce or eliminate the need for surgery has been long-awaited. Herein, we sought to gain insight about future utilization by surveying VHL kidney cancer experts in the United States. A survey developed by members of the VHL Alliance (VHLA) Clinical Advisory Council was distributed to kidney cancer providers at VHLA and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) centers. Surveys were administered on a secure web-based platform. A total of 60 respondents from 29 institutions participated. Urologists (50%) and medical oncologists (43%) represented the majority of participants. The majority (98%) of respondents anticipated that belzutifan's approval would significantly change the current treatment landscape. Most reported that therapy should be continuous (76%). There was a difference in willingness to prescribe belzutifan by specialty (38% of urologists vs 91% of medical oncologists (P = 0.02)). In individuals with renal tumors <3 cm, 36% would still recommend surveillance, while 36% would initiate belzutifan to prevent growth. In those with multifocal renal lesions and growth of a solitary tumor on belzutifan, 50% would proceed with only treatment of that site. In conclusion, VHL kidney cancer specialists anticipate a paradigm shift with the approval of belzutifan. Provider roles may change with movement away from surgical management. Opinions on treatment indications, such as when to initiate therapy and how to best salvage, vary widely and therefore collaborative efforts among experts may assist in the development of new clinical guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信