分光光度法直接肽反应性测定(Spectro-DPRA)作为一种改良的化学皮肤致敏试验方法的预验证研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Jung-Ah Seo, Sun-A Cho, Chang Eon Park, Dong Hyuk Seo, Myungsuk Choi, Susun An, Bae-Hwan Kim
{"title":"分光光度法直接肽反应性测定(Spectro-DPRA)作为一种改良的化学皮肤致敏试验方法的预验证研究。","authors":"Jung-Ah Seo,&nbsp;Sun-A Cho,&nbsp;Chang Eon Park,&nbsp;Dong Hyuk Seo,&nbsp;Myungsuk Choi,&nbsp;Susun An,&nbsp;Bae-Hwan Kim","doi":"10.1007/s43188-022-00130-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skin sensitization is induced when certain chemicals bind to skin proteins. Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been adopted by the OECD as an alternative method to evaluate skin sensitization by assessing a substance's reaction to two model peptides. A modified spectrophotometric method, Spectro-DPRA, can evaluate skin sensitization, in a high throughput fashion, to obviate some limitations of DPRA. Pre-validation studies for Spectro-DPRA were conducted to determine transferability and proficiency, within- and between-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive ability based on GLP principles at three laboratories (AP, KTR, and KCL). All laboratories confirmed high (> 90%) concordance for evaluating the sensitivity induced by ten chemical substances. The concordance among the three tests performed by each laboratory was 90% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 100% for KCL. The mean accuracy of the laboratories was 93.3% [compared to the standard operating procedure (SOP)]. The reproducibility among the three laboratories was as high as 86.7%; the accuracy was 86.7% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 86.7% for KCL (compared to the SOP). An additional 54 substances were assessed in 3 separate labs to verify the prediction rate. Based on the result, 29 out of 33 substances were classified as sensitizers, and 19 out of 21 identified as non-sensitizers; the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were 87.9%, 90.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that the Spectro-DPRA can address the molecular initiating event with improved predictability and reproducibility, while saving time and cost compared to DPRA or ADRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":23181,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Research","volume":"38 4","pages":"531-544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532475/pdf/43188_2022_Article_130.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified <i>in chemico</i> skin sensitization test method.\",\"authors\":\"Jung-Ah Seo,&nbsp;Sun-A Cho,&nbsp;Chang Eon Park,&nbsp;Dong Hyuk Seo,&nbsp;Myungsuk Choi,&nbsp;Susun An,&nbsp;Bae-Hwan Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43188-022-00130-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Skin sensitization is induced when certain chemicals bind to skin proteins. Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been adopted by the OECD as an alternative method to evaluate skin sensitization by assessing a substance's reaction to two model peptides. A modified spectrophotometric method, Spectro-DPRA, can evaluate skin sensitization, in a high throughput fashion, to obviate some limitations of DPRA. Pre-validation studies for Spectro-DPRA were conducted to determine transferability and proficiency, within- and between-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive ability based on GLP principles at three laboratories (AP, KTR, and KCL). All laboratories confirmed high (> 90%) concordance for evaluating the sensitivity induced by ten chemical substances. The concordance among the three tests performed by each laboratory was 90% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 100% for KCL. The mean accuracy of the laboratories was 93.3% [compared to the standard operating procedure (SOP)]. The reproducibility among the three laboratories was as high as 86.7%; the accuracy was 86.7% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 86.7% for KCL (compared to the SOP). An additional 54 substances were assessed in 3 separate labs to verify the prediction rate. Based on the result, 29 out of 33 substances were classified as sensitizers, and 19 out of 21 identified as non-sensitizers; the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were 87.9%, 90.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that the Spectro-DPRA can address the molecular initiating event with improved predictability and reproducibility, while saving time and cost compared to DPRA or ADRA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicological Research\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"531-544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532475/pdf/43188_2022_Article_130.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-022-00130-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-022-00130-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当某些化学物质与皮肤蛋白质结合时,会诱发皮肤致敏。经合组织已采用直接肽反应性测定法(DPRA)作为一种替代方法,通过评估物质对两种模型肽的反应来评估皮肤致敏性。一种改进的分光光度法Spectro-DPRA可以以高通量的方式评估皮肤致敏性,以消除DPRA的一些局限性。基于GLP原理,在三个实验室(AP、KTR和KCL)对Spectro DPRA进行了预验证研究,以确定可转移性和熟练度、实验室内和实验室间的再现性以及预测能力。所有实验室确认为高(> 90%)的一致性。每个实验室进行的三项测试中,AP、KTR和KCL的一致性分别为90%、100%和100%。实验室的平均准确率为93.3%[与标准操作程序(SOP)相比]。三个实验室之间的再现性高达86.7%;AP、KTR和KCL的准确率分别为86.7%、100%和86.7%(与SOP相比)。另外54种物质在3个独立的实验室中进行了评估,以验证预测率。根据这一结果,33种物质中有29种被列为敏化剂,21种物质中的19种被确定为非敏化剂;相应的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为87.9%、90.5%和88.9%。这些发现表明,与DPRA或ADRA相比,Spectro DPRA可以以改进的可预测性和再现性解决分子启动事件,同时节省时间和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified <i>in chemico</i> skin sensitization test method.

Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified in chemico skin sensitization test method.

Skin sensitization is induced when certain chemicals bind to skin proteins. Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has been adopted by the OECD as an alternative method to evaluate skin sensitization by assessing a substance's reaction to two model peptides. A modified spectrophotometric method, Spectro-DPRA, can evaluate skin sensitization, in a high throughput fashion, to obviate some limitations of DPRA. Pre-validation studies for Spectro-DPRA were conducted to determine transferability and proficiency, within- and between-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive ability based on GLP principles at three laboratories (AP, KTR, and KCL). All laboratories confirmed high (> 90%) concordance for evaluating the sensitivity induced by ten chemical substances. The concordance among the three tests performed by each laboratory was 90% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 100% for KCL. The mean accuracy of the laboratories was 93.3% [compared to the standard operating procedure (SOP)]. The reproducibility among the three laboratories was as high as 86.7%; the accuracy was 86.7% for AP, 100% for KTR, and 86.7% for KCL (compared to the SOP). An additional 54 substances were assessed in 3 separate labs to verify the prediction rate. Based on the result, 29 out of 33 substances were classified as sensitizers, and 19 out of 21 identified as non-sensitizers; the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were 87.9%, 90.5%, and 88.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that the Spectro-DPRA can address the molecular initiating event with improved predictability and reproducibility, while saving time and cost compared to DPRA or ADRA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Toxicological Research is the official journal of the Korean Society of Toxicology. The journal covers all areas of Toxicological Research of chemicals, drugs and environmental agents affecting human and animals, which in turn impact public health. The journal’s mission is to disseminate scientific and technical information on diverse areas of toxicological research. Contributions by toxicologists, molecular biologists, geneticists, biochemists, pharmacologists, clinical researchers and epidemiologists with a global view on public health through toxicological research are welcome. Emphasis will be given to articles providing an understanding of the toxicological mechanisms affecting animal, human and public health. In the case of research articles using natural extracts, detailed information with respect to the origin, extraction method, chemical profiles, and characterization of standard compounds to ensure the reproducible pharmacological activity should be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信