Blake E S Taylor, Smit Patel, Patrick Hilden, Fadar Oliver Otite, Kiwon Lee, Gaurav Gupta, Priyank Khandelwal
{"title":"周末对机械取栓的影响:2015年关键试验前后的全国分析","authors":"Blake E S Taylor, Smit Patel, Patrick Hilden, Fadar Oliver Otite, Kiwon Lee, Gaurav Gupta, Priyank Khandelwal","doi":"10.4103/bc.bc_23_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As hospitals rapidly implement mechanical thrombectomy (MT) into stroke protocols following the pivotal trials in 2015, access to and outcomes from MT may be poorer for weekend-admitted patients. We sought to investigate whether a \"weekend effect\" influences MT outcomes nationally.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified stroke patients from 2010-2014 (pre-trials) to 2015-2017 (posttrials) using the Nationwide Readmissions Database. On multivariate analyses, we determined factors independently associated with receiving MT. Among MT patients, we then determined whether weekend admission was independently associated with inpatient mortality and unfavorable discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2,121,462 patients from 2010 to 2014, of whom 1.11% of weekday-admitted and 1.08% of weekend-admitted patients underwent MT. Of the 1,286,501 patients identified from 2015 to 2017, MT was performed in 2.82% and 2.91%, respectively. In the earlier cohort, weekend admission was independently associated with reduced odds of MT (odds ratio [OR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.95, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), although this was not statistically significant in the later cohort. During both periods, age >80 years was independently associated with a reduced likelihood of receiving MT, and status as a teaching or large bed-size hospital was associated with a greater likelihood. Weekend admission was independently associated with unfavorable discharge only in the 2015-2017 cohort (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22, <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While nationwide access to MT has improved for weekend-admitted patients, the elderly and those at smaller, nonteaching hospitals remain underserved. Although we found no effect of weekend admission on inpatient mortality, since the major shift in practice, an emerging \"weekend effect\" may influence discharge outcomes. Data suggest that some hospitals are being challenged to provide this new standard of care efficiently and equitably.</p>","PeriodicalId":9288,"journal":{"name":"Brain Circulation","volume":"8 3","pages":"137-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/41/c9/BC-8-137.PMC9578310.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The weekend effect on mechanical thrombectomy: A nationwide analysis before and after the pivotal 2015 trials.\",\"authors\":\"Blake E S Taylor, Smit Patel, Patrick Hilden, Fadar Oliver Otite, Kiwon Lee, Gaurav Gupta, Priyank Khandelwal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bc.bc_23_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As hospitals rapidly implement mechanical thrombectomy (MT) into stroke protocols following the pivotal trials in 2015, access to and outcomes from MT may be poorer for weekend-admitted patients. We sought to investigate whether a \\\"weekend effect\\\" influences MT outcomes nationally.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified stroke patients from 2010-2014 (pre-trials) to 2015-2017 (posttrials) using the Nationwide Readmissions Database. On multivariate analyses, we determined factors independently associated with receiving MT. Among MT patients, we then determined whether weekend admission was independently associated with inpatient mortality and unfavorable discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2,121,462 patients from 2010 to 2014, of whom 1.11% of weekday-admitted and 1.08% of weekend-admitted patients underwent MT. Of the 1,286,501 patients identified from 2015 to 2017, MT was performed in 2.82% and 2.91%, respectively. In the earlier cohort, weekend admission was independently associated with reduced odds of MT (odds ratio [OR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.95, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), although this was not statistically significant in the later cohort. During both periods, age >80 years was independently associated with a reduced likelihood of receiving MT, and status as a teaching or large bed-size hospital was associated with a greater likelihood. Weekend admission was independently associated with unfavorable discharge only in the 2015-2017 cohort (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22, <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While nationwide access to MT has improved for weekend-admitted patients, the elderly and those at smaller, nonteaching hospitals remain underserved. Although we found no effect of weekend admission on inpatient mortality, since the major shift in practice, an emerging \\\"weekend effect\\\" may influence discharge outcomes. Data suggest that some hospitals are being challenged to provide this new standard of care efficiently and equitably.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Circulation\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"137-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/41/c9/BC-8-137.PMC9578310.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bc.bc_23_22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bc.bc_23_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
随着医院在2015年的关键试验后迅速将机械取栓(MT)纳入卒中治疗方案,对于周末入院的患者来说,机械取栓的可及性和结果可能更差。我们试图调查“周末效应”是否会影响全国的MT结果。材料和方法:我们使用全国再入院数据库筛选2010-2014年(试验前)至2015-2017年(试验后)的脑卒中患者。在多变量分析中,我们确定了与接受MT相关的独立因素。在MT患者中,我们确定周末入院是否与住院死亡率和不良出院独立相关。结果:2010年至2014年,我们共发现2121462例患者,其中工作日入院的患者占1.11%,周末入院的患者占1.08%。在2015年至2017年发现的1286501例患者中,MT的比例分别为2.82%和2.91%。在早期队列中,周末入院与MT的几率降低独立相关(优势比[OR] = 0.92, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.89-0.95, P < 0.0001),尽管这在后期队列中没有统计学意义。在这两个时期,年龄>80岁与接受MT的可能性降低独立相关,而作为教学医院或大床医院的地位与接受MT的可能性更高相关。仅在2015-2017年队列中,周末住院与不良出院独立相关(OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22, P = 0.02)。结论:虽然全国范围内周末入院的患者获得MT的机会有所改善,但老年人和较小的非教学医院的患者仍然得不到充分的服务。虽然我们没有发现周末入院对住院死亡率的影响,但由于实践中的重大转变,新出现的“周末效应”可能会影响出院结果。数据表明,一些医院在有效和公平地提供这种新的护理标准方面面临挑战。
The weekend effect on mechanical thrombectomy: A nationwide analysis before and after the pivotal 2015 trials.
Objectives: As hospitals rapidly implement mechanical thrombectomy (MT) into stroke protocols following the pivotal trials in 2015, access to and outcomes from MT may be poorer for weekend-admitted patients. We sought to investigate whether a "weekend effect" influences MT outcomes nationally.
Materials and methods: We identified stroke patients from 2010-2014 (pre-trials) to 2015-2017 (posttrials) using the Nationwide Readmissions Database. On multivariate analyses, we determined factors independently associated with receiving MT. Among MT patients, we then determined whether weekend admission was independently associated with inpatient mortality and unfavorable discharge.
Results: We identified 2,121,462 patients from 2010 to 2014, of whom 1.11% of weekday-admitted and 1.08% of weekend-admitted patients underwent MT. Of the 1,286,501 patients identified from 2015 to 2017, MT was performed in 2.82% and 2.91%, respectively. In the earlier cohort, weekend admission was independently associated with reduced odds of MT (odds ratio [OR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.95, P < 0.0001), although this was not statistically significant in the later cohort. During both periods, age >80 years was independently associated with a reduced likelihood of receiving MT, and status as a teaching or large bed-size hospital was associated with a greater likelihood. Weekend admission was independently associated with unfavorable discharge only in the 2015-2017 cohort (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22, P = 0.02).
Conclusions: While nationwide access to MT has improved for weekend-admitted patients, the elderly and those at smaller, nonteaching hospitals remain underserved. Although we found no effect of weekend admission on inpatient mortality, since the major shift in practice, an emerging "weekend effect" may influence discharge outcomes. Data suggest that some hospitals are being challenged to provide this new standard of care efficiently and equitably.