GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS 研究中的性/性别多样性调查--目标、程序和经验。

Journal of health monitoring Pub Date : 2022-06-29 eCollection Date: 2022-06-01 DOI:10.25646/9958
Kathleen Pöge, Alexander Rommel, Anne Starker, Franziska Prütz, Katharina Tolksdorf, Ilter Öztürk, Sarah Strasser, Sabine Born, Anke-Christine Saß
{"title":"GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS 研究中的性/性别多样性调查--目标、程序和经验。","authors":"Kathleen Pöge, Alexander Rommel, Anne Starker, Franziska Prütz, Katharina Tolksdorf, Ilter Öztürk, Sarah Strasser, Sabine Born, Anke-Christine Saß","doi":"10.25646/9958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sex/gender diversity is increasingly recognised by society and should be taken into account more in population-representative studies, as they are important data sources for targeting health promotion, prevention and care. In 2019, the Robert Koch Institute started a population-representative health survey with the study Health in Germany Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) with a modified, two-stage measures of sex/gender. The survey covered sex registered at birth and gender identity with an open response option. This article describes the aims, the procedure and the experiences with the operationalisation of sex/gender and the results. Out of 23,001 respondents, 22,826 persons are classified as cisgender, 113 persons as transgender and 29 persons as gender-diverse. 33 respondents were counted as having missing values. A survey of interviewers showed that the two-stage measures of sex/gender had a high level of acceptance overall and that there were only a few interview drop-outs. On the basis of previous experience, the modified query can be used for further surveys, but should also be adapted in perspective. For this purpose, participatory studies are desirable that focus on how the acceptance of measures of sex/gender can be further improved and how hurtful experiences in the context of the questions asked can be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":73767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study - objectives, procedure and experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Pöge, Alexander Rommel, Anne Starker, Franziska Prütz, Katharina Tolksdorf, Ilter Öztürk, Sarah Strasser, Sabine Born, Anke-Christine Saß\",\"doi\":\"10.25646/9958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sex/gender diversity is increasingly recognised by society and should be taken into account more in population-representative studies, as they are important data sources for targeting health promotion, prevention and care. In 2019, the Robert Koch Institute started a population-representative health survey with the study Health in Germany Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) with a modified, two-stage measures of sex/gender. The survey covered sex registered at birth and gender identity with an open response option. This article describes the aims, the procedure and the experiences with the operationalisation of sex/gender and the results. Out of 23,001 respondents, 22,826 persons are classified as cisgender, 113 persons as transgender and 29 persons as gender-diverse. 33 respondents were counted as having missing values. A survey of interviewers showed that the two-stage measures of sex/gender had a high level of acceptance overall and that there were only a few interview drop-outs. On the basis of previous experience, the modified query can be used for further surveys, but should also be adapted in perspective. For this purpose, participatory studies are desirable that focus on how the acceptance of measures of sex/gender can be further improved and how hurtful experiences in the context of the questions asked can be avoided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health monitoring\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275517/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25646/9958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25646/9958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性别/性别多样性日益得到社会的认可,并应在人口代表性研究中得到更多考虑,因为它们是有针对性地促进健康、预防和护理的重要数据来源。2019 年,罗伯特-科赫研究所启动了一项具有人口代表性的健康调查,即 "德国最新健康状况 "研究(GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS),并对性/性别进行了两阶段的修改测量。调查涵盖出生时登记的性别和性别认同,并提供开放式回答选项。本文介绍了此次调查的目的、程序、性别/性别的操作经验和结果。在 23 001 名受访者中,22 826 人被归类为顺性性别,113 人被归类为变性性别,29 人被归类为性别多元化。有 33 名受访者的性别值缺失。对访谈员的调查显示,性/性别两阶段测量的总体接受度很高,只有少数访谈员退出。根据以往的经验,修改后的查询可用于进一步的调查,但也应根据具体情况进行调整。为此,最好开展参与式研究,重点研究如何进一步提高对性/性别测量的接受程度,以及如何避免所提问题带来的伤害性经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study - objectives, procedure and experiences.

Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study - objectives, procedure and experiences.

Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study - objectives, procedure and experiences.

Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study - objectives, procedure and experiences.

Sex/gender diversity is increasingly recognised by society and should be taken into account more in population-representative studies, as they are important data sources for targeting health promotion, prevention and care. In 2019, the Robert Koch Institute started a population-representative health survey with the study Health in Germany Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) with a modified, two-stage measures of sex/gender. The survey covered sex registered at birth and gender identity with an open response option. This article describes the aims, the procedure and the experiences with the operationalisation of sex/gender and the results. Out of 23,001 respondents, 22,826 persons are classified as cisgender, 113 persons as transgender and 29 persons as gender-diverse. 33 respondents were counted as having missing values. A survey of interviewers showed that the two-stage measures of sex/gender had a high level of acceptance overall and that there were only a few interview drop-outs. On the basis of previous experience, the modified query can be used for further surveys, but should also be adapted in perspective. For this purpose, participatory studies are desirable that focus on how the acceptance of measures of sex/gender can be further improved and how hurtful experiences in the context of the questions asked can be avoided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信