理论心理学:心理学研究中的话语转换和连续性/心理学展望。

Psychological Research Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-27 DOI:10.1007/s00426-022-01727-2
Alexander Nicolai Wendt, Uwe Wolfradt
{"title":"理论心理学:心理学研究中的话语转换和连续性/心理学展望。","authors":"Alexander Nicolai Wendt,&nbsp;Uwe Wolfradt","doi":"10.1007/s00426-022-01727-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychological Research (formerly Psychologische Forschung) has been published for a century which makes it a valuable subject matter for historical investigations. The journal's development bears traces of the progress in psychology. This development is of particular interest for the field of theoretical psychology which investigates the epistemological and methodological background. Our hypothesis is that the history of Psychological Research is indicative for the transformations within the discourse of the discipline, i.e., the general context of communication in psychology. We revisit the changes in the editorial practises of the journal through a scientometric mixed-methods approach, combining bibliometric analyses which compare Psychological Research to Psychological Review and the British Journal of Psychology with a single-case investigation. Regarding form, we find continuities and disruptions in the development of the editorial customs from long and single-author to short and multi-author contributions. Investigating content through word frequency analysis shows that the journal's history reflects the rise of the cognitivist paradigm as well as a transition from theoretical discourse towards experimentation. The analysis of a single case demonstrates the nature of past theoretical discourse in contrast to contemporary practises. Overall, our findings support the assumption of discursive transformations. From the perspective of theoretical psychology, these transformations can be described as a shift towards Methodism which entails a critical negligence of theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":501681,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research","volume":" ","pages":"2321-2340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674726/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical psychology: discursive transformations and continuity in Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Nicolai Wendt,&nbsp;Uwe Wolfradt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00426-022-01727-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Psychological Research (formerly Psychologische Forschung) has been published for a century which makes it a valuable subject matter for historical investigations. The journal's development bears traces of the progress in psychology. This development is of particular interest for the field of theoretical psychology which investigates the epistemological and methodological background. Our hypothesis is that the history of Psychological Research is indicative for the transformations within the discourse of the discipline, i.e., the general context of communication in psychology. We revisit the changes in the editorial practises of the journal through a scientometric mixed-methods approach, combining bibliometric analyses which compare Psychological Research to Psychological Review and the British Journal of Psychology with a single-case investigation. Regarding form, we find continuities and disruptions in the development of the editorial customs from long and single-author to short and multi-author contributions. Investigating content through word frequency analysis shows that the journal's history reflects the rise of the cognitivist paradigm as well as a transition from theoretical discourse towards experimentation. The analysis of a single case demonstrates the nature of past theoretical discourse in contrast to contemporary practises. Overall, our findings support the assumption of discursive transformations. From the perspective of theoretical psychology, these transformations can be described as a shift towards Methodism which entails a critical negligence of theory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2321-2340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01727-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01727-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

《心理学研究》(Psychologische Forschung)已经出版了一个世纪,这使得它成为历史调查的一个有价值的主题。该杂志的发展有心理学进步的痕迹。这一发展对研究认识论和方法论背景的理论心理学领域特别感兴趣。我们的假设是,心理学研究的历史预示着该学科话语的转变,即心理学中交流的一般背景。我们通过科学计量学混合方法,结合文献计量学分析,将《心理学研究》与《心理学评论》和《英国心理学杂志》进行比较,并结合单个案例调查,重新审视了该杂志编辑实践的变化。关于形式,我们发现编辑习惯从长和单一作者到短和多作者贡献的发展的连续性和中断。通过词频分析调查内容表明,该期刊的历史反映了认知主义范式的兴起以及从理论话语到实验的过渡。对单个案例的分析表明了过去理论话语与当代实践对比的本质。总的来说,我们的研究结果支持话语转换的假设。从理论心理学的角度来看,这些转变可以被描述为一种对理论的批判性忽视的循道主义的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Theoretical psychology: discursive transformations and continuity in Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung.

Theoretical psychology: discursive transformations and continuity in Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung.

Theoretical psychology: discursive transformations and continuity in Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung.

Theoretical psychology: discursive transformations and continuity in Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung.

Psychological Research (formerly Psychologische Forschung) has been published for a century which makes it a valuable subject matter for historical investigations. The journal's development bears traces of the progress in psychology. This development is of particular interest for the field of theoretical psychology which investigates the epistemological and methodological background. Our hypothesis is that the history of Psychological Research is indicative for the transformations within the discourse of the discipline, i.e., the general context of communication in psychology. We revisit the changes in the editorial practises of the journal through a scientometric mixed-methods approach, combining bibliometric analyses which compare Psychological Research to Psychological Review and the British Journal of Psychology with a single-case investigation. Regarding form, we find continuities and disruptions in the development of the editorial customs from long and single-author to short and multi-author contributions. Investigating content through word frequency analysis shows that the journal's history reflects the rise of the cognitivist paradigm as well as a transition from theoretical discourse towards experimentation. The analysis of a single case demonstrates the nature of past theoretical discourse in contrast to contemporary practises. Overall, our findings support the assumption of discursive transformations. From the perspective of theoretical psychology, these transformations can be described as a shift towards Methodism which entails a critical negligence of theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信