紧跟潮流:为产妇心脏骤停模拟课程开发及时循证学习目标。

Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-23 DOI:10.26502/fccm.92920260
Andrea D Shields, Jacqueline Battistelli, Laurie Kavanagh, Lara Ouellette, Brook Thomson, Peter Nielsen
{"title":"紧跟潮流:为产妇心脏骤停模拟课程开发及时循证学习目标。","authors":"Andrea D Shields,&nbsp;Jacqueline Battistelli,&nbsp;Laurie Kavanagh,&nbsp;Lara Ouellette,&nbsp;Brook Thomson,&nbsp;Peter Nielsen","doi":"10.26502/fccm.92920260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our objective was to review the latest evidence on resuscitation care for maternal cardiac arrest (MCA) and gain expert consensus on best practices to inform an evidence-based curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We convened a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders in MCA to develop an evidence-based simulation training, Obstetric Life Support™ (OBLS). To inform the learning objectives, we used a novel three-step process to achieve consensus on best practices for maternal resuscitation. First, we reaffirmed the evidence process on an existing MCA guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). Next, via systematic review, we evaluated the latest evidence on MCA and identified emerging topics since the publication of the MCA guideline. Finally, we applied a modified Research and Development (RAND) technique to gain consensus on emerging topics to include as additional just-in-time best practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AGREE II survey results demonstrated unanimous consensus on reaffirmation of the 2015 American Heart Association (AHA) MCA guideline for inclusion into the OBLS curriculum. A systematic review with deduplication resulted in 11,871 articles for review. After categorizing and synthesizing the relevant literature, we presented twelve additional best practices to the expert panel using a modified RAND technique. Upon completion, the 2015 AHA statement and nine additional just-in-time best practices were affirmed to inform the OBLS curriculum.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel three-step process including reaffirmation of evidence process, systematic review, and a modified RAND technique resulted in unanimous consensus from experts in MCA resuscitation on existing and new just-in-time best practices to inform the learning objectives for an evidence-based curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":72523,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","volume":" ","pages":"245-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296142/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staying Current: Developing Just-in-time Evidence-Based Learning Objectives for a Maternal Cardiac Arrest Simulation Curriculum.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea D Shields,&nbsp;Jacqueline Battistelli,&nbsp;Laurie Kavanagh,&nbsp;Lara Ouellette,&nbsp;Brook Thomson,&nbsp;Peter Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.26502/fccm.92920260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our objective was to review the latest evidence on resuscitation care for maternal cardiac arrest (MCA) and gain expert consensus on best practices to inform an evidence-based curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We convened a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders in MCA to develop an evidence-based simulation training, Obstetric Life Support™ (OBLS). To inform the learning objectives, we used a novel three-step process to achieve consensus on best practices for maternal resuscitation. First, we reaffirmed the evidence process on an existing MCA guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). Next, via systematic review, we evaluated the latest evidence on MCA and identified emerging topics since the publication of the MCA guideline. Finally, we applied a modified Research and Development (RAND) technique to gain consensus on emerging topics to include as additional just-in-time best practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AGREE II survey results demonstrated unanimous consensus on reaffirmation of the 2015 American Heart Association (AHA) MCA guideline for inclusion into the OBLS curriculum. A systematic review with deduplication resulted in 11,871 articles for review. After categorizing and synthesizing the relevant literature, we presented twelve additional best practices to the expert panel using a modified RAND technique. Upon completion, the 2015 AHA statement and nine additional just-in-time best practices were affirmed to inform the OBLS curriculum.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel three-step process including reaffirmation of evidence process, systematic review, and a modified RAND technique resulted in unanimous consensus from experts in MCA resuscitation on existing and new just-in-time best practices to inform the learning objectives for an evidence-based curriculum.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"245-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296142/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:我们的目的是回顾产妇心脏骤停(MCA)复苏护理的最新证据,并就最佳实践获得专家共识,以告知循证课程。方法:我们召集了MCA利益相关者的多学科小组来开发基于证据的模拟培训,产科生命支持™(obs)。为了告知学习目标,我们采用了一种新颖的三步流程来就产妇复苏的最佳实践达成共识。首先,我们使用研究和评估指南评估(AGREE II)重申了现有MCA指南的证据过程。接下来,通过系统回顾,我们评估了MCA指南发布以来有关MCA的最新证据并确定了新出现的主题。最后,我们应用了一种改进的研究与开发(RAND)技术来获得关于新兴主题的共识,以包括作为额外的准时制最佳实践。结果:AGREE II调查结果显示一致同意重申2015年美国心脏协会(AHA) MCA指南纳入OBLS课程。采用重复数据删除的系统评价结果为11,871篇文章。在对相关文献进行分类和综合后,我们使用改进的RAND技术向专家组提出了12个额外的最佳实践。完成后,2015年AHA声明和另外9个及时的最佳实践被确认为OBLS课程。结论:一个新的三步过程,包括证据过程的重申、系统回顾和改进的RAND技术,导致MCA复苏专家对现有和新的及时最佳实践达成一致意见,以告知循证课程的学习目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Staying Current: Developing Just-in-time Evidence-Based Learning Objectives for a Maternal Cardiac Arrest Simulation Curriculum.

Background: Our objective was to review the latest evidence on resuscitation care for maternal cardiac arrest (MCA) and gain expert consensus on best practices to inform an evidence-based curriculum.

Methods: We convened a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders in MCA to develop an evidence-based simulation training, Obstetric Life Support™ (OBLS). To inform the learning objectives, we used a novel three-step process to achieve consensus on best practices for maternal resuscitation. First, we reaffirmed the evidence process on an existing MCA guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). Next, via systematic review, we evaluated the latest evidence on MCA and identified emerging topics since the publication of the MCA guideline. Finally, we applied a modified Research and Development (RAND) technique to gain consensus on emerging topics to include as additional just-in-time best practices.

Results: The AGREE II survey results demonstrated unanimous consensus on reaffirmation of the 2015 American Heart Association (AHA) MCA guideline for inclusion into the OBLS curriculum. A systematic review with deduplication resulted in 11,871 articles for review. After categorizing and synthesizing the relevant literature, we presented twelve additional best practices to the expert panel using a modified RAND technique. Upon completion, the 2015 AHA statement and nine additional just-in-time best practices were affirmed to inform the OBLS curriculum.

Conclusions: A novel three-step process including reaffirmation of evidence process, systematic review, and a modified RAND technique resulted in unanimous consensus from experts in MCA resuscitation on existing and new just-in-time best practices to inform the learning objectives for an evidence-based curriculum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信