重复事件数据分析的时间尺度选择。

IF 1.2 3区 数学 Q3 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Lifetime Data Analysis Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-15 DOI:10.1007/s10985-022-09569-1
Philip Hougaard
{"title":"重复事件数据分析的时间尺度选择。","authors":"Philip Hougaard","doi":"10.1007/s10985-022-09569-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrent events refer to events that over time can occur several times for each individual. Full use of such data in a clinical trial requires a method that addresses the dependence between events. For modelling this dependence, there are two time scales to consider, namely time since start of the study (running time) or time since most recent event (gap time). In the multi-state setup, it is possible to estimate parameters also in the case, where the hazard model allows for an effect of both time scales, making this an extremely flexible approach. However, for summarizing the effect of a treatment in a transparent and informative way, the choice of time scale and model requires much more care. This paper discusses these choices both from a theoretical and practical point of view. This is supported by a simulation study showing that in a frailty model with assumptions covered by both time scales, the gap time approach may give misleading results. A literature dataset is used for illustrating the issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":49908,"journal":{"name":"Lifetime Data Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice of time scale for analysis of recurrent events data.\",\"authors\":\"Philip Hougaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10985-022-09569-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recurrent events refer to events that over time can occur several times for each individual. Full use of such data in a clinical trial requires a method that addresses the dependence between events. For modelling this dependence, there are two time scales to consider, namely time since start of the study (running time) or time since most recent event (gap time). In the multi-state setup, it is possible to estimate parameters also in the case, where the hazard model allows for an effect of both time scales, making this an extremely flexible approach. However, for summarizing the effect of a treatment in a transparent and informative way, the choice of time scale and model requires much more care. This paper discusses these choices both from a theoretical and practical point of view. This is supported by a simulation study showing that in a frailty model with assumptions covered by both time scales, the gap time approach may give misleading results. A literature dataset is used for illustrating the issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lifetime Data Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lifetime Data Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-022-09569-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lifetime Data Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-022-09569-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复发性事件是指随着时间的推移,每个人都可能发生多次的事件。在临床试验中充分利用这些数据需要一种处理事件之间依赖关系的方法。为了对这种依赖性进行建模,需要考虑两个时间尺度,即自研究开始以来的时间(运行时间)或自最近事件以来的时间(间隔时间)。在多状态设置中,也可以在风险模型考虑两个时间尺度影响的情况下估计参数,使其成为一种非常灵活的方法。然而,为了透明和信息地总结治疗效果,时间尺度和模型的选择需要更多的注意。本文从理论和实践两个角度对这些选择进行了探讨。一项模拟研究支持了这一点,该研究表明,在具有两种时间尺度的假设的脆弱性模型中,间隙时间方法可能会给出误导性的结果。文献数据集用于说明这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Choice of time scale for analysis of recurrent events data.

Choice of time scale for analysis of recurrent events data.

Recurrent events refer to events that over time can occur several times for each individual. Full use of such data in a clinical trial requires a method that addresses the dependence between events. For modelling this dependence, there are two time scales to consider, namely time since start of the study (running time) or time since most recent event (gap time). In the multi-state setup, it is possible to estimate parameters also in the case, where the hazard model allows for an effect of both time scales, making this an extremely flexible approach. However, for summarizing the effect of a treatment in a transparent and informative way, the choice of time scale and model requires much more care. This paper discusses these choices both from a theoretical and practical point of view. This is supported by a simulation study showing that in a frailty model with assumptions covered by both time scales, the gap time approach may give misleading results. A literature dataset is used for illustrating the issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lifetime Data Analysis
Lifetime Data Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The objective of Lifetime Data Analysis is to advance and promote statistical science in the various applied fields that deal with lifetime data, including: Actuarial Science – Economics – Engineering Sciences – Environmental Sciences – Management Science – Medicine – Operations Research – Public Health – Social and Behavioral Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信