威尔士COVID封锁期间验光独立处方。

Paul Cottrell, Rachel North, Nik Sheen, Barbara Ryan
{"title":"威尔士COVID封锁期间验光独立处方。","authors":"Paul Cottrell,&nbsp;Rachel North,&nbsp;Nik Sheen,&nbsp;Barbara Ryan","doi":"10.1111/opo.13028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the COVID-19 lockdown, primary care optometry services in Wales moved to a hub model of provision. Three independent prescribing models were available in different areas: a commissioned Independent Prescribing Optometry Service (IPOS), independent prescribers that were not commissioned and no independent prescribers available. This allowed a unique opportunity for comparison.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Optometry practices completed an online survey for each patient episode. Analysis of the data gave insight into patient presentation to urgent eye services and the drugs prescribed by optometrists. Medicines prescribed, sold or given and onward referral were compared between areas with an IPOS service (n = 2), those with prescribers but no commissioned service (n = 2) and those with no prescribers (n = 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 22,434 reported patient episodes from 81 optometry practices in six health boards between 14 April 2020 and 30 June 2020 were analysed. Urgent care accounted for 10,997 (49.02%) first appointments and 1777 (7.92%) follow-ups. Most (18,006, 80.26%) patients self-referred. The most common presenting symptom was 'Eye pain/discomfort' (4818, 43.81% of urgent attendances). Anterior segment pathology was the most reported finding at first (6078, 55.27%) and follow-up (1316, 74.06%) urgent care appointments. Topical steroids (373, 25.99% of prescriptions) were the most prescribed medications. More medications were prescribed in areas with an IPOS service (1136, 79.16% of prescriptions) than areas with prescribers but no commissioned service. There were more follow-up appointments in optometric practice and fewer urgent referrals to ophthalmology in IPOS areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urgent care services were most utilised by patients with discomfort caused by anterior eye conditions. IPOS services enabled optometrists to manage conditions to resolution without referral and without reduction in medications sold or given. Commissioners should recognise the value in reducing burden in urgent ophthalmology and the need for follow-up as part of a commissioned independent prescribing service.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":"1289-1303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538163/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optometry independent prescribing during COVID lockdown in Wales.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Cottrell,&nbsp;Rachel North,&nbsp;Nik Sheen,&nbsp;Barbara Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the COVID-19 lockdown, primary care optometry services in Wales moved to a hub model of provision. Three independent prescribing models were available in different areas: a commissioned Independent Prescribing Optometry Service (IPOS), independent prescribers that were not commissioned and no independent prescribers available. This allowed a unique opportunity for comparison.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Optometry practices completed an online survey for each patient episode. Analysis of the data gave insight into patient presentation to urgent eye services and the drugs prescribed by optometrists. Medicines prescribed, sold or given and onward referral were compared between areas with an IPOS service (n = 2), those with prescribers but no commissioned service (n = 2) and those with no prescribers (n = 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 22,434 reported patient episodes from 81 optometry practices in six health boards between 14 April 2020 and 30 June 2020 were analysed. Urgent care accounted for 10,997 (49.02%) first appointments and 1777 (7.92%) follow-ups. Most (18,006, 80.26%) patients self-referred. The most common presenting symptom was 'Eye pain/discomfort' (4818, 43.81% of urgent attendances). Anterior segment pathology was the most reported finding at first (6078, 55.27%) and follow-up (1316, 74.06%) urgent care appointments. Topical steroids (373, 25.99% of prescriptions) were the most prescribed medications. More medications were prescribed in areas with an IPOS service (1136, 79.16% of prescriptions) than areas with prescribers but no commissioned service. There were more follow-up appointments in optometric practice and fewer urgent referrals to ophthalmology in IPOS areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urgent care services were most utilised by patients with discomfort caused by anterior eye conditions. IPOS services enabled optometrists to manage conditions to resolution without referral and without reduction in medications sold or given. Commissioners should recognise the value in reducing burden in urgent ophthalmology and the need for follow-up as part of a commissioned independent prescribing service.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1289-1303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538163/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

导言:在2019冠状病毒病封锁期间,威尔士的初级保健验光服务转向了中心提供模式。在不同的地区有三种独立的处方模式:委托独立处方验光服务(IPOS)、未委托的独立处方者和没有独立处方者。这为比较提供了一个独特的机会。方法:验光师对每位患者进行在线调查。通过对数据的分析,可以深入了解患者对紧急眼科服务的表现以及验光师开具的药物。在有IPOS服务的地区(n = 2)、有处方者但没有委托服务的地区(n = 2)和没有处方者的地区(n = 2)之间比较处方、销售或给予的药物和后续转诊。结果:分析了2020年4月14日至2020年6月30日期间6个卫生委员会81个验光诊所的22,434例报告患者发作的数据。急诊首次预约10997例(49.02%),随访1777例(7.92%)。大多数患者(18006例,80.26%)自行就诊。最常见的症状是“眼睛疼痛/不适”(4818人,占紧急就诊人数的43.81%)。前节段病理是首次急诊(6078例,55.27%)和随访(1316例,74.06%)中报告最多的发现。外用类固醇(373张,占处方的25.99%)是处方最多的药物。有IPOS服务地区的处方数量(1136,占处方的79.16%)高于无委托服务地区的处方数量。在IPOS地区,有更多的视光实践随访预约和更少的紧急转介到眼科。结论:使用急诊服务的患者多为前眼病引起的不适。IPOS服务使验光师能够在不转诊和不减少销售或给予药物的情况下管理病情解决。委员们应该认识到减少紧急眼科负担的价值,以及作为委托独立处方服务的一部分进行随访的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optometry independent prescribing during COVID lockdown in Wales.

Optometry independent prescribing during COVID lockdown in Wales.

Optometry independent prescribing during COVID lockdown in Wales.

Optometry independent prescribing during COVID lockdown in Wales.

Introduction: During the COVID-19 lockdown, primary care optometry services in Wales moved to a hub model of provision. Three independent prescribing models were available in different areas: a commissioned Independent Prescribing Optometry Service (IPOS), independent prescribers that were not commissioned and no independent prescribers available. This allowed a unique opportunity for comparison.

Method: Optometry practices completed an online survey for each patient episode. Analysis of the data gave insight into patient presentation to urgent eye services and the drugs prescribed by optometrists. Medicines prescribed, sold or given and onward referral were compared between areas with an IPOS service (n = 2), those with prescribers but no commissioned service (n = 2) and those with no prescribers (n = 2).

Results: Data from 22,434 reported patient episodes from 81 optometry practices in six health boards between 14 April 2020 and 30 June 2020 were analysed. Urgent care accounted for 10,997 (49.02%) first appointments and 1777 (7.92%) follow-ups. Most (18,006, 80.26%) patients self-referred. The most common presenting symptom was 'Eye pain/discomfort' (4818, 43.81% of urgent attendances). Anterior segment pathology was the most reported finding at first (6078, 55.27%) and follow-up (1316, 74.06%) urgent care appointments. Topical steroids (373, 25.99% of prescriptions) were the most prescribed medications. More medications were prescribed in areas with an IPOS service (1136, 79.16% of prescriptions) than areas with prescribers but no commissioned service. There were more follow-up appointments in optometric practice and fewer urgent referrals to ophthalmology in IPOS areas.

Conclusion: Urgent care services were most utilised by patients with discomfort caused by anterior eye conditions. IPOS services enabled optometrists to manage conditions to resolution without referral and without reduction in medications sold or given. Commissioners should recognise the value in reducing burden in urgent ophthalmology and the need for follow-up as part of a commissioned independent prescribing service.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信