超声引导椎旁阻滞与胸膜横突中点阻滞在乳房切除术术后镇痛效果的比较:一项随机研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-17 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2022.2098544
Agâh Abdullah Kahramanlar, Mehmet Aksoy, Ilker Ince, Aysenur Dostbıl, Erdem Karadenız
{"title":"超声引导椎旁阻滞与胸膜横突中点阻滞在乳房切除术术后镇痛效果的比较:一项随机研究。","authors":"Agâh Abdullah Kahramanlar,&nbsp;Mehmet Aksoy,&nbsp;Ilker Ince,&nbsp;Aysenur Dostbıl,&nbsp;Erdem Karadenız","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2022.2098544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/aim of the study: </strong>The purpose of this triple-blind randomized study is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of Mid-Point Transverse Process Pleura Block (MTP) and Paravertebral Block (PVB) in patients undergoing breast surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05332028). A total of 64 patients undergoing unilateral simple mastectomy operation due to breast cancer were included in the study. Before the anesthesia procedure, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1: Participants undergoing PVB or Group 2: Participants undergoing MTP block. All block applications were performed using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Routine general anesthesia protocol was performed on all patients. In the postanesthetic care unit, fentanyl infusion was given to all patients postoperatively via a patient-controlled analgesia device. Postoperative fentanyl consumption, time to the first request for analgesia, VAS score values at rest and in motion, and blocked dermatome areas were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative total opioid consumption, the number of patients given rescue analgesia, the time requiring postoperative supplemental analgesia, postoperative pain scores at rest and in motion, and blocked dermatome areas at both anterior and posterior lower and upper limits were not different between groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05, for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was concluded that ultrasound-guided PVB and MTP blocks have similar postoperative analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing breast surgery. The MTP block may be preferred as an alternative to PVB for breast surgeries with less risk of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"35 9","pages":"1694-1699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block and Mid-Point Transverse Process Pleura Block in Mastectomy Surgeries: A Randomized Study.\",\"authors\":\"Agâh Abdullah Kahramanlar,&nbsp;Mehmet Aksoy,&nbsp;Ilker Ince,&nbsp;Aysenur Dostbıl,&nbsp;Erdem Karadenız\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08941939.2022.2098544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose/aim of the study: </strong>The purpose of this triple-blind randomized study is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of Mid-Point Transverse Process Pleura Block (MTP) and Paravertebral Block (PVB) in patients undergoing breast surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05332028). A total of 64 patients undergoing unilateral simple mastectomy operation due to breast cancer were included in the study. Before the anesthesia procedure, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1: Participants undergoing PVB or Group 2: Participants undergoing MTP block. All block applications were performed using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Routine general anesthesia protocol was performed on all patients. In the postanesthetic care unit, fentanyl infusion was given to all patients postoperatively via a patient-controlled analgesia device. Postoperative fentanyl consumption, time to the first request for analgesia, VAS score values at rest and in motion, and blocked dermatome areas were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative total opioid consumption, the number of patients given rescue analgesia, the time requiring postoperative supplemental analgesia, postoperative pain scores at rest and in motion, and blocked dermatome areas at both anterior and posterior lower and upper limits were not different between groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05, for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was concluded that ultrasound-guided PVB and MTP blocks have similar postoperative analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing breast surgery. The MTP block may be preferred as an alternative to PVB for breast surgeries with less risk of complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"volume\":\"35 9\",\"pages\":\"1694-1699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2022.2098544\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2022.2098544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究目的/目的:本三盲随机研究的目的是比较胸膜中点横突阻滞(MTP)和椎旁阻滞(PVB)在乳房手术患者术后的镇痛效果。材料和方法:该研究在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05332028)上回顾性注册。本研究共纳入64例因乳腺癌行单侧乳房切除术的患者。在麻醉之前,参与者被随机分配到两组中的一组:第一组:接受PVB的参与者或第二组:接受MTP阻滞的参与者。所有阻滞应用均使用20ml 0.25%布比卡因。所有患者均行常规全身麻醉。在麻醉后护理单元,所有患者术后均通过患者自控镇痛装置输注芬太尼。记录术后芬太尼用量、第一次请求镇痛的时间、静止和运动时的VAS评分值以及皮肤组织阻塞区域。结果:术后阿片类药物总用量、给予抢救性镇痛的患者人数、术后需要补充镇痛的时间、术后静息和运动疼痛评分、前、后下限和上限皮肤组织阻塞面积组间差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:超声引导下PVB阻滞与MTP阻滞对乳腺手术患者的术后镇痛效果相似。在乳房手术中,MTP阻滞可作为PVB的替代方案,并发症风险较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block and Mid-Point Transverse Process Pleura Block in Mastectomy Surgeries: A Randomized Study.

Purpose/aim of the study: The purpose of this triple-blind randomized study is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of Mid-Point Transverse Process Pleura Block (MTP) and Paravertebral Block (PVB) in patients undergoing breast surgery.

Materials and methods: The study was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05332028). A total of 64 patients undergoing unilateral simple mastectomy operation due to breast cancer were included in the study. Before the anesthesia procedure, participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1: Participants undergoing PVB or Group 2: Participants undergoing MTP block. All block applications were performed using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Routine general anesthesia protocol was performed on all patients. In the postanesthetic care unit, fentanyl infusion was given to all patients postoperatively via a patient-controlled analgesia device. Postoperative fentanyl consumption, time to the first request for analgesia, VAS score values at rest and in motion, and blocked dermatome areas were recorded.

Results: Postoperative total opioid consumption, the number of patients given rescue analgesia, the time requiring postoperative supplemental analgesia, postoperative pain scores at rest and in motion, and blocked dermatome areas at both anterior and posterior lower and upper limits were not different between groups (p > 0.05, for all).

Conclusions: It was concluded that ultrasound-guided PVB and MTP blocks have similar postoperative analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing breast surgery. The MTP block may be preferred as an alternative to PVB for breast surgeries with less risk of complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信