新鲜对话的虚拟传递,一个SNAP-Ed项目:参与者感知影响和满意度。

Q3 Medicine
Loo Yee Wong, Sarah L Francis, Haley Hopkins, Hailey Boudreau
{"title":"新鲜对话的虚拟传递,一个SNAP-Ed项目:参与者感知影响和满意度。","authors":"Loo Yee Wong,&nbsp;Sarah L Francis,&nbsp;Haley Hopkins,&nbsp;Hailey Boudreau","doi":"10.1080/21551197.2022.2107594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This four-month study evaluated the virtual delivery of <i>Fresh Conversations</i> (<i>FC</i>). Participants were community-residing Iowans ages 60+ years. They were placed in one of four meeting groups based on location and participant preference: Zoom™, Adobe Connect<sup>®</sup>, group-based Zoom™ meeting, and teleconference. Participants were invited to complete a post-meeting online survey. Data analyses were completed using data from the first survey completed by each participant (<i>n</i> = 115). Descriptive statistics assessed response frequencies for all questions. Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests assessed the differences between groups. Overall, participants were \"satisfied/very satisfied\" (72.1%), learned something new (85.2%), and intended to make behavior change (79.1%); no differences were detected by the group for satisfaction or reported impacts. Only 24.3% reported technical difficulties; the Adobe Connect<sup>®</sup> group reported the most difficulties (<i>p</i> = .004). These findings suggest virtual delivery of <i>FC</i> is well-received and perceived to be effective by participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":38899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"191-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual Delivery of <i>Fresh Conversations</i>, a SNAP-Ed Program: Participant Perceived Impact and Satisfaction.\",\"authors\":\"Loo Yee Wong,&nbsp;Sarah L Francis,&nbsp;Haley Hopkins,&nbsp;Hailey Boudreau\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21551197.2022.2107594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This four-month study evaluated the virtual delivery of <i>Fresh Conversations</i> (<i>FC</i>). Participants were community-residing Iowans ages 60+ years. They were placed in one of four meeting groups based on location and participant preference: Zoom™, Adobe Connect<sup>®</sup>, group-based Zoom™ meeting, and teleconference. Participants were invited to complete a post-meeting online survey. Data analyses were completed using data from the first survey completed by each participant (<i>n</i> = 115). Descriptive statistics assessed response frequencies for all questions. Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests assessed the differences between groups. Overall, participants were \\\"satisfied/very satisfied\\\" (72.1%), learned something new (85.2%), and intended to make behavior change (79.1%); no differences were detected by the group for satisfaction or reported impacts. Only 24.3% reported technical difficulties; the Adobe Connect<sup>®</sup> group reported the most difficulties (<i>p</i> = .004). These findings suggest virtual delivery of <i>FC</i> is well-received and perceived to be effective by participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"191-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21551197.2022.2107594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21551197.2022.2107594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项为期四个月的研究评估了Fresh Conversations (FC)的虚拟交付。参与者为60岁以上居住在爱荷华州社区的居民。根据地点和参与者偏好,他们被安排在四个会议组中的一个:Zoom™、Adobe Connect®、基于小组的Zoom™会议和电话会议。参与者被邀请完成一份会后在线调查。数据分析使用每个参与者完成的第一次调查的数据(n = 115)。描述性统计评估了所有问题的回答频率。卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验评估了组间差异。总体而言,参与者“满意/非常满意”(72.1%),学到了新东西(85.2%),并打算改变行为(79.1%);该小组在满意度或报告的影响方面没有发现差异。只有24.3%的人报告了技术上的困难;Adobe Connect®组报告的困难最多(p = .004)。这些研究结果表明,虚拟交付的FC很受欢迎,并被参与者认为是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual Delivery of Fresh Conversations, a SNAP-Ed Program: Participant Perceived Impact and Satisfaction.

This four-month study evaluated the virtual delivery of Fresh Conversations (FC). Participants were community-residing Iowans ages 60+ years. They were placed in one of four meeting groups based on location and participant preference: Zoom™, Adobe Connect®, group-based Zoom™ meeting, and teleconference. Participants were invited to complete a post-meeting online survey. Data analyses were completed using data from the first survey completed by each participant (n = 115). Descriptive statistics assessed response frequencies for all questions. Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney U tests assessed the differences between groups. Overall, participants were "satisfied/very satisfied" (72.1%), learned something new (85.2%), and intended to make behavior change (79.1%); no differences were detected by the group for satisfaction or reported impacts. Only 24.3% reported technical difficulties; the Adobe Connect® group reported the most difficulties (p = .004). These findings suggest virtual delivery of FC is well-received and perceived to be effective by participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics publishes original research studies that are directly relevant to clinical and community nutrition issues that affect older adults. Epidemiologic and community-based studies are suitable for JNE, as are well-controlled clinical trials of preventive and therapeutic nutritional interventions. The Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics invites papers on a broad array of topics in the nutrition and aging field, including but not limited to studies of: preventive nutrition, nutritional interventions for chronic disease, aging effects on nutritional requirements, nutritional status and dietary intake behaviors, nutritional frailty and functional status, usefulness of supplements, programmatic interventions, transitions in care and long term care, and community nutrition issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信