巴西打击 COVID-19 的财政权力下放政策不成功的教训。

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Ricardo Lopes Cardoso, Ricardo Rocha de Azevedo, José Alexandre Magrini Pigatto, Bernardo de Abreu Guelber Fajardo, Armando Santos Moreira da Cunha
{"title":"巴西打击 COVID-19 的财政权力下放政策不成功的教训。","authors":"Ricardo Lopes Cardoso, Ricardo Rocha de Azevedo, José Alexandre Magrini Pigatto, Bernardo de Abreu Guelber Fajardo, Armando Santos Moreira da Cunha","doi":"10.1002/pad.1990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This manuscript investigates the unsuccessful case of the fiscal decentralization policy implemented by the Brazilian central government to help municipalities fight COVID-19. Based on quantitative analyses of data available on governmental websites, we identified that the transfer policy had ignored municipalities' risk patterns and income changes. It benefited municipalities regardless of their vulnerability and population infection risks, and many municipalities reduced healthcare expenditures funded by their revenues during the pandemic. Hence, some municipalities made a \"pandemic surplus\" in 2020 - a municipal electoral year. Indeed, COVID-19 killed 663,694 people in Brazil until 4 May 2022. Lessons from an unsuccessful case of response to COVID-19 help develop resilience for other crises by emerging market economies and developing countries. The findings have implications for policymakers and literature since they represent inadequate vertical coordination that followed a path dependence on traditional decentralization policies and took place in a year of municipal elections without clear spending and accountability rules.</p>","PeriodicalId":39679,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350285/pdf/PAD-9999-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons from Brazil's unsuccessful fiscal decentralization policy to fight COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Lopes Cardoso, Ricardo Rocha de Azevedo, José Alexandre Magrini Pigatto, Bernardo de Abreu Guelber Fajardo, Armando Santos Moreira da Cunha\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pad.1990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This manuscript investigates the unsuccessful case of the fiscal decentralization policy implemented by the Brazilian central government to help municipalities fight COVID-19. Based on quantitative analyses of data available on governmental websites, we identified that the transfer policy had ignored municipalities' risk patterns and income changes. It benefited municipalities regardless of their vulnerability and population infection risks, and many municipalities reduced healthcare expenditures funded by their revenues during the pandemic. Hence, some municipalities made a \\\"pandemic surplus\\\" in 2020 - a municipal electoral year. Indeed, COVID-19 killed 663,694 people in Brazil until 4 May 2022. Lessons from an unsuccessful case of response to COVID-19 help develop resilience for other crises by emerging market economies and developing countries. The findings have implications for policymakers and literature since they represent inadequate vertical coordination that followed a path dependence on traditional decentralization policies and took place in a year of municipal elections without clear spending and accountability rules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Administration and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350285/pdf/PAD-9999-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Administration and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1990\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Development","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1990","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本手稿调查了巴西中央政府为帮助市政当局抗击 COVID-19 而实施的财政权力下放政策的失败案例。通过对政府网站上的数据进行定量分析,我们发现该转移政策忽视了各市的风险模式和收入变化。无论各市的脆弱性和人口感染风险如何,该政策都能使其受益,而且许多市在大流行期间减少了由其收入资助的医疗支出。因此,一些市政当局在 2020 年--市政选举年--出现了 "大流行盈余"。事实上,截至 2022 年 5 月 4 日,COVID-19 在巴西造成 663 694 人死亡。从应对 COVID-19 的失败案例中汲取的经验教训有助于新兴市场经济体和发展中国家发展应对其他危机的复原力。研究结果对政策制定者和文献具有启示意义,因为这些研究表明,纵向协调不足是对传统权力下放政策的路径依赖,并且发生在没有明确支出和问责规则的市政选举年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lessons from Brazil's unsuccessful fiscal decentralization policy to fight COVID-19.

Lessons from Brazil's unsuccessful fiscal decentralization policy to fight COVID-19.

This manuscript investigates the unsuccessful case of the fiscal decentralization policy implemented by the Brazilian central government to help municipalities fight COVID-19. Based on quantitative analyses of data available on governmental websites, we identified that the transfer policy had ignored municipalities' risk patterns and income changes. It benefited municipalities regardless of their vulnerability and population infection risks, and many municipalities reduced healthcare expenditures funded by their revenues during the pandemic. Hence, some municipalities made a "pandemic surplus" in 2020 - a municipal electoral year. Indeed, COVID-19 killed 663,694 people in Brazil until 4 May 2022. Lessons from an unsuccessful case of response to COVID-19 help develop resilience for other crises by emerging market economies and developing countries. The findings have implications for policymakers and literature since they represent inadequate vertical coordination that followed a path dependence on traditional decentralization policies and took place in a year of municipal elections without clear spending and accountability rules.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Administration and Development
Public Administration and Development Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Since its founding in 1949, Public Administration and Development (PAD) has been reviewing and assessing the practice of public administration at the local, regional, national and international levels where it is directed to managing development processes in low and medium income countries. It gives special attention to investigations of the management of all phases of public policy formulation and implementation which have an interest and importance beyond a particular government and state. PAD has a particular interest in the link between public administration practice and management research and provides a professional and academic forum for reporting on new experiences and experiments. PAD also publishes articles on development management research in the NGO sector. It is widely read by academics and practitioners alike, including consultants, donors and policy advisers. With its case study approach, it is also frequently used for teaching and training purposes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信