益生菌或合成菌对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇高血压疾病的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。

Journal of Caring Sciences Pub Date : 2022-05-29 eCollection Date: 2022-05-01 DOI:10.34172/jcs.2021.027
Rouhina Movaghar, Azizeh Farshbaf-Khalili, Khadijeh Hajizade, Mehdi Ebrahimpour MirzaRezaei, Mahnaz Shahnazi
{"title":"益生菌或合成菌对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇高血压疾病的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rouhina Movaghar,&nbsp;Azizeh Farshbaf-Khalili,&nbsp;Khadijeh Hajizade,&nbsp;Mehdi Ebrahimpour MirzaRezaei,&nbsp;Mahnaz Shahnazi","doi":"10.34172/jcs.2021.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Antioxidants and anti-inflammatory drugs have been suggested to treat preeclampsia. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation on hypertensive disorders in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) . <b>Methods:</b> The databases including Cochrane, Embase, Ovid, ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were systematically searched for collecting the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation versus placebo on hypertensive disorders and pregnancy outcomes in GDM until July 2020. <b>Results:</b> Five RCTs with a total sample size of 402 women were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant decline in systolic blood pressure (standardized mean difference [SMD]=-3.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]=-8.32 to 1.50, <i>P</i>=0.17), diastolic blood pressure (SMD=-5.11, 95% CI=-14.20 to -3.98, <i>P</i>=0.27), preeclampsia (odds ratio [OR]=1.56, 95% CI=0.61 to 3.98, <i>P</i>=0.35), cesarean section (OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.18 to 1.50, <i>P</i>=0.23), and macrosomia (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.41 to 1.57, <i>P</i>=0.53). No significant increase was observed in terms of 5-minute Apgar (SMD=0.16, 95% CI=-0.06 to 0.39, <i>P</i>=0.15, I<sup>2</sup>=0%), birth weight (SMD=-0.18, 95% CI=-0.43 to 0.06, <i>P</i>=0.13, I<sup>2</sup>=0%), and gestational age (SMD=0.13, 95% CI=-0.11 to 0.37, <i>P</i>=0.28, I<sup>2</sup>=0%). <b>Conclusion:</b> Probiotic or synbiotic supplements are not associated with significant effects on pregnancy outcomes in GDM. However, due to the limited number of studies in this regard and heterogeneity between studies, future high-quality RCTs are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":15317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"11 2","pages":"94-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/26/jcs-11-94.PMC9339131.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Probiotics or Synbiotics on the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rouhina Movaghar,&nbsp;Azizeh Farshbaf-Khalili,&nbsp;Khadijeh Hajizade,&nbsp;Mehdi Ebrahimpour MirzaRezaei,&nbsp;Mahnaz Shahnazi\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jcs.2021.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Antioxidants and anti-inflammatory drugs have been suggested to treat preeclampsia. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation on hypertensive disorders in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) . <b>Methods:</b> The databases including Cochrane, Embase, Ovid, ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were systematically searched for collecting the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation versus placebo on hypertensive disorders and pregnancy outcomes in GDM until July 2020. <b>Results:</b> Five RCTs with a total sample size of 402 women were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant decline in systolic blood pressure (standardized mean difference [SMD]=-3.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]=-8.32 to 1.50, <i>P</i>=0.17), diastolic blood pressure (SMD=-5.11, 95% CI=-14.20 to -3.98, <i>P</i>=0.27), preeclampsia (odds ratio [OR]=1.56, 95% CI=0.61 to 3.98, <i>P</i>=0.35), cesarean section (OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.18 to 1.50, <i>P</i>=0.23), and macrosomia (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.41 to 1.57, <i>P</i>=0.53). No significant increase was observed in terms of 5-minute Apgar (SMD=0.16, 95% CI=-0.06 to 0.39, <i>P</i>=0.15, I<sup>2</sup>=0%), birth weight (SMD=-0.18, 95% CI=-0.43 to 0.06, <i>P</i>=0.13, I<sup>2</sup>=0%), and gestational age (SMD=0.13, 95% CI=-0.11 to 0.37, <i>P</i>=0.28, I<sup>2</sup>=0%). <b>Conclusion:</b> Probiotic or synbiotic supplements are not associated with significant effects on pregnancy outcomes in GDM. However, due to the limited number of studies in this regard and heterogeneity between studies, future high-quality RCTs are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"94-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/26/jcs-11-94.PMC9339131.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2021.027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2021.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

导言:抗氧化剂和抗炎药物已被建议用于治疗先兆子痫。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在探讨益生菌或合成菌补充剂对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)妇女高血压疾病的疗效。方法:系统检索Cochrane、Embase、Ovid、ProQuest、Scopus、Web of Science和PubMed等数据库,收集截至2020年7月调查益生菌或合成菌补充剂与安慰剂相比对GDM患者高血压疾病和妊娠结局疗效的随机对照试验(rct)。结果:meta分析纳入了5项随机对照试验,总样本量为402名女性。收缩压(标准化平均差[SMD]=-3.41, 95%可信区间[CI]=-8.32 ~ 1.50, P=0.17)、舒张压(SMD=-5.11, 95% CI=-14.20 ~ -3.98, P=0.27)、子痫前期(优势比[OR]=1.56, 95% CI=0.61 ~ 3.98, P=0.35)、剖宫产(OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.18 ~ 1.50, P=0.23)和巨大儿(OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.41 ~ 1.57, P=0.53)均无显著下降。在5分钟Apgar (SMD=0.16, 95% CI=-0.06 ~ 0.39, P=0.15, I2=0%)、出生体重(SMD=-0.18, 95% CI=-0.43 ~ 0.06, P=0.13, I2=0%)和胎龄(SMD=0.13, 95% CI=-0.11 ~ 0.37, P=0.28, I2=0%)方面均未观察到显著增加。结论:益生菌或合成菌补充剂对GDM妊娠结局无显著影响。然而,由于这方面的研究数量有限,且研究之间存在异质性,建议将来进行高质量的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effect of Probiotics or Synbiotics on the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The Effect of Probiotics or Synbiotics on the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The Effect of Probiotics or Synbiotics on the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The Effect of Probiotics or Synbiotics on the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Introduction: Antioxidants and anti-inflammatory drugs have been suggested to treat preeclampsia. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation on hypertensive disorders in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) . Methods: The databases including Cochrane, Embase, Ovid, ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were systematically searched for collecting the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation versus placebo on hypertensive disorders and pregnancy outcomes in GDM until July 2020. Results: Five RCTs with a total sample size of 402 women were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant decline in systolic blood pressure (standardized mean difference [SMD]=-3.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]=-8.32 to 1.50, P=0.17), diastolic blood pressure (SMD=-5.11, 95% CI=-14.20 to -3.98, P=0.27), preeclampsia (odds ratio [OR]=1.56, 95% CI=0.61 to 3.98, P=0.35), cesarean section (OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.18 to 1.50, P=0.23), and macrosomia (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.41 to 1.57, P=0.53). No significant increase was observed in terms of 5-minute Apgar (SMD=0.16, 95% CI=-0.06 to 0.39, P=0.15, I2=0%), birth weight (SMD=-0.18, 95% CI=-0.43 to 0.06, P=0.13, I2=0%), and gestational age (SMD=0.13, 95% CI=-0.11 to 0.37, P=0.28, I2=0%). Conclusion: Probiotic or synbiotic supplements are not associated with significant effects on pregnancy outcomes in GDM. However, due to the limited number of studies in this regard and heterogeneity between studies, future high-quality RCTs are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信