涉及TIRADS分类(EU-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS和K-TIRADS)评估甲状腺局灶性病变恶性潜能的meta分析综述。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Ultrasonography Pub Date : 2022-04-27 eCollection Date: 2022-04-01 DOI:10.15557/JoU.2022.0020
Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak, Zbigniew Adamczewski, Marek Dedecjus, Andrzej Lewiński, Bartosz Migda, Marek Ruchała, Anna Skowrońska-Szcześniak, Ewelina Szczepanek-Parulska, Klaudia Zajkowska, Agnieszka Żyłka
{"title":"涉及TIRADS分类(EU-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS和K-TIRADS)评估甲状腺局灶性病变恶性潜能的meta分析综述。","authors":"Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak,&nbsp;Zbigniew Adamczewski,&nbsp;Marek Dedecjus,&nbsp;Andrzej Lewiński,&nbsp;Bartosz Migda,&nbsp;Marek Ruchała,&nbsp;Anna Skowrońska-Szcześniak,&nbsp;Ewelina Szczepanek-Parulska,&nbsp;Klaudia Zajkowska,&nbsp;Agnieszka Żyłka","doi":"10.15557/JoU.2022.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous scientific societies around the world have published their TIRADS (Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) classifications that evaluate the risk of malignancy of focal thyroid lesions, presenting different ultrasound features for each category and lesion size thresholds to determine eligibility for biopsy. The use of such risk estimation systems in focal thyroid lesions facilitates the reporting of thyroid ultrasound findings and improves the qualification of focal lesions for fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). In this publication, the three most popular TIRADS classifications, European - EU-TIRADS, Korean - K-TIRADS, and developed by the American Society of Radiology - ACR-TIRADS, are presented and discussed based on a literature review. The results of available head-to-head statistical analyses comparing the classifications are also presented. The advantage of the EU-TIRADS and K-TIRADS systems is that they include only the most important ultrasound features, so their application is not time-consuming, and the scores are easy to incorporate into clinical practice. ACR-TIRADS, unlike other scales, is based on a unique classification system and represents the most comprehensive classification. Each of the five categories of ultrasound features - morphology, echogenicity, shape, margins, microcalcifications - are evaluated and assigned a score from 0 to 3, with a higher score being associated with a higher risk of cancer. Based on the available data, the greatest benefit has been demonstrated for the ACR-TIRADS classification, which also has implications for minimising the number of unnecessary FNABs. However, limitations related to the heterogeneity of the groups analysed in the study, including differences in the populations studied, inclusion criteria, proportions of patients of either sexes, and the number of malignant lesions analysed, should also be taken into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":45612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasonography","volume":"22 89","pages":"121-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/4b/jou-22-121.PMC9231519.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Summary of Meta-analyses of Studies Involving TIRADS Classifications (EU-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and K-TIRADS) in Evaluating the Malignant Potential of Focal Lesions of The Thyroid Gland.\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak,&nbsp;Zbigniew Adamczewski,&nbsp;Marek Dedecjus,&nbsp;Andrzej Lewiński,&nbsp;Bartosz Migda,&nbsp;Marek Ruchała,&nbsp;Anna Skowrońska-Szcześniak,&nbsp;Ewelina Szczepanek-Parulska,&nbsp;Klaudia Zajkowska,&nbsp;Agnieszka Żyłka\",\"doi\":\"10.15557/JoU.2022.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Numerous scientific societies around the world have published their TIRADS (Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) classifications that evaluate the risk of malignancy of focal thyroid lesions, presenting different ultrasound features for each category and lesion size thresholds to determine eligibility for biopsy. The use of such risk estimation systems in focal thyroid lesions facilitates the reporting of thyroid ultrasound findings and improves the qualification of focal lesions for fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). In this publication, the three most popular TIRADS classifications, European - EU-TIRADS, Korean - K-TIRADS, and developed by the American Society of Radiology - ACR-TIRADS, are presented and discussed based on a literature review. The results of available head-to-head statistical analyses comparing the classifications are also presented. The advantage of the EU-TIRADS and K-TIRADS systems is that they include only the most important ultrasound features, so their application is not time-consuming, and the scores are easy to incorporate into clinical practice. ACR-TIRADS, unlike other scales, is based on a unique classification system and represents the most comprehensive classification. Each of the five categories of ultrasound features - morphology, echogenicity, shape, margins, microcalcifications - are evaluated and assigned a score from 0 to 3, with a higher score being associated with a higher risk of cancer. Based on the available data, the greatest benefit has been demonstrated for the ACR-TIRADS classification, which also has implications for minimising the number of unnecessary FNABs. However, limitations related to the heterogeneity of the groups analysed in the study, including differences in the populations studied, inclusion criteria, proportions of patients of either sexes, and the number of malignant lesions analysed, should also be taken into account.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasonography\",\"volume\":\"22 89\",\"pages\":\"121-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/4b/jou-22-121.PMC9231519.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasonography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2022.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2022.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

世界各地的许多科学学会已经发布了他们的TIRADS(甲状腺成像报告和数据系统)分类,评估局灶性甲状腺病变的恶性风险,为每个类别提供不同的超声特征和病变大小阈值,以确定是否有资格进行活检。在局灶性甲状腺病变中使用这种风险评估系统有助于报告甲状腺超声结果,并提高了细针穿刺活检(FNAB)局灶性病变的资格。在本出版物中,三种最流行的TIRADS分类,欧洲-欧盟-TIRADS,韩国- K-TIRADS,并由美国放射学会发展- ACR-TIRADS,在文献综述的基础上提出和讨论。还介绍了现有的对头统计分析的结果,比较了这些分类。EU-TIRADS和K-TIRADS系统的优点是它们只包括最重要的超声特征,因此它们的应用不耗时,并且分数很容易纳入临床实践。与其他量表不同,ACR-TIRADS基于独特的分类系统,代表了最全面的分类。对五类超声特征——形态、回声性、形状、边缘、微钙化——进行评估,并给出0到3分的评分,得分越高,患癌症的风险越高。根据现有数据,ACR-TIRADS分类的最大益处已被证明,这也意味着将不必要的fnab数量降至最低。然而,与研究中分析的群体异质性相关的局限性,包括研究人群的差异、纳入标准、男女患者的比例以及所分析的恶性病变的数量,也应考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Summary of Meta-analyses of Studies Involving TIRADS Classifications (EU-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and K-TIRADS) in Evaluating the Malignant Potential of Focal Lesions of The Thyroid Gland.

Summary of Meta-analyses of Studies Involving TIRADS Classifications (EU-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and K-TIRADS) in Evaluating the Malignant Potential of Focal Lesions of The Thyroid Gland.

Summary of Meta-analyses of Studies Involving TIRADS Classifications (EU-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and K-TIRADS) in Evaluating the Malignant Potential of Focal Lesions of The Thyroid Gland.

Summary of Meta-analyses of Studies Involving TIRADS Classifications (EU-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and K-TIRADS) in Evaluating the Malignant Potential of Focal Lesions of The Thyroid Gland.

Numerous scientific societies around the world have published their TIRADS (Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) classifications that evaluate the risk of malignancy of focal thyroid lesions, presenting different ultrasound features for each category and lesion size thresholds to determine eligibility for biopsy. The use of such risk estimation systems in focal thyroid lesions facilitates the reporting of thyroid ultrasound findings and improves the qualification of focal lesions for fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). In this publication, the three most popular TIRADS classifications, European - EU-TIRADS, Korean - K-TIRADS, and developed by the American Society of Radiology - ACR-TIRADS, are presented and discussed based on a literature review. The results of available head-to-head statistical analyses comparing the classifications are also presented. The advantage of the EU-TIRADS and K-TIRADS systems is that they include only the most important ultrasound features, so their application is not time-consuming, and the scores are easy to incorporate into clinical practice. ACR-TIRADS, unlike other scales, is based on a unique classification system and represents the most comprehensive classification. Each of the five categories of ultrasound features - morphology, echogenicity, shape, margins, microcalcifications - are evaluated and assigned a score from 0 to 3, with a higher score being associated with a higher risk of cancer. Based on the available data, the greatest benefit has been demonstrated for the ACR-TIRADS classification, which also has implications for minimising the number of unnecessary FNABs. However, limitations related to the heterogeneity of the groups analysed in the study, including differences in the populations studied, inclusion criteria, proportions of patients of either sexes, and the number of malignant lesions analysed, should also be taken into account.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasonography
Journal of Ultrasonography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信