实施和评估IGNITE(改善GME护理跨专业团队经验)以改善学术卫生系统的护理

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Vineet M. Arora , Aviva Klein , Alesia Coe , Ajanta Patel , Debra Albert , Anita Blanchard , For the IGNITE/PEI Steering Committee
{"title":"实施和评估IGNITE(改善GME护理跨专业团队经验)以改善学术卫生系统的护理","authors":"Vineet M. Arora ,&nbsp;Aviva Klein ,&nbsp;Alesia Coe ,&nbsp;Ajanta Patel ,&nbsp;Debra Albert ,&nbsp;Anita Blanchard ,&nbsp;For the IGNITE/PEI Steering Committee","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Engaging residents with nurses in interprofessional performance improvement teams can improve learning and care. Residents at the University of Chicago Medicine were identified by nurses, and endorsed by program directors, to serve alongside nurses in Improving GME Nursing Interprofessional Team Experiences (IGNITE) teams. Teams met monthly with improvement coaches to implement institutionally aligned improvement plans. Institutional data was used to monitor progress. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) assessed interprofessional collaboration competency. Press Ganey Clinician Engagement (PGCE) data examined year over year differences in items related to teamwork comparing IGNITE units and non-IGNITE units. Length of stay (LOS) differences were also examined. From 2015 to 2019, IGNITE spread to 9 service lines engaging over 100 residents and nurses. Unit-based teams focused on adding nurses to attending rounds, implementing nurses-resident huddles, and improving multidisciplinary rounds. ICCAS scores significantly improved. PGCE data showed year over year improvements in composite teamwork and communication scores in IGNITE units. All adult inpatient IGNITE units saw a mean LOS reduction ranging from −0.15 days to −1.16 days, equating to an estimated cost savings of nearly 3 million dollars per quarter. Lessons learned include: 1) the importance of engaging hospital leadership; 2) the need to align collaborative practices with institutional goals; 3) the critical role of coaching; and 4) practices to ensure committed, consistent participants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"10 3","pages":"Article 100642"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and evaluation of IGNITE (Improving GME Nursing Interprofessional Team Experiences) to improve care in an academic health system\",\"authors\":\"Vineet M. Arora ,&nbsp;Aviva Klein ,&nbsp;Alesia Coe ,&nbsp;Ajanta Patel ,&nbsp;Debra Albert ,&nbsp;Anita Blanchard ,&nbsp;For the IGNITE/PEI Steering Committee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Engaging residents with nurses in interprofessional performance improvement teams can improve learning and care. Residents at the University of Chicago Medicine were identified by nurses, and endorsed by program directors, to serve alongside nurses in Improving GME Nursing Interprofessional Team Experiences (IGNITE) teams. Teams met monthly with improvement coaches to implement institutionally aligned improvement plans. Institutional data was used to monitor progress. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) assessed interprofessional collaboration competency. Press Ganey Clinician Engagement (PGCE) data examined year over year differences in items related to teamwork comparing IGNITE units and non-IGNITE units. Length of stay (LOS) differences were also examined. From 2015 to 2019, IGNITE spread to 9 service lines engaging over 100 residents and nurses. Unit-based teams focused on adding nurses to attending rounds, implementing nurses-resident huddles, and improving multidisciplinary rounds. ICCAS scores significantly improved. PGCE data showed year over year improvements in composite teamwork and communication scores in IGNITE units. All adult inpatient IGNITE units saw a mean LOS reduction ranging from −0.15 days to −1.16 days, equating to an estimated cost savings of nearly 3 million dollars per quarter. Lessons learned include: 1) the importance of engaging hospital leadership; 2) the need to align collaborative practices with institutional goals; 3) the critical role of coaching; and 4) practices to ensure committed, consistent participants.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076422000318\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076422000318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在跨专业绩效改进团队中,让住院医生与护士一起参与可以改善学习和护理。芝加哥大学医学院的住院医师由护士确定,并得到项目主管的认可,与护士一起在改善GME护理跨专业团队体验(IGNITE)团队中服务。团队每月与改进教练会面,以实施与机构一致的改进计划。机构数据被用来监测进展情况。跨专业协作能力获得调查(ICCAS)评估了跨专业协作能力。Press Ganey临床医生参与(PGCE)数据检查了每年与团队合作相关的项目比较IGNITE单位和非IGNITE单位的差异。停留时间(LOS)的差异也被检查。从2015年到2019年,IGNITE扩展到9条服务线路,涉及100多名住院医生和护士。以单位为基础的小组侧重于增加护士参加查房,实施护士-住院医师会议,以及改进多学科查房。ICCAS评分显著提高。PGCE数据显示,IGNITE单元的综合团队合作和沟通得分逐年提高。所有成人住院IGNITE单位的平均LOS减少从- 0.15天到- 1.16天不等,相当于每个季度估计节省近300万美元的成本。经验教训包括:1)医院领导参与的重要性;2)需要将协作实践与机构目标保持一致;3)教练的关键作用;4)实践,以确保承诺,一致的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation and evaluation of IGNITE (Improving GME Nursing Interprofessional Team Experiences) to improve care in an academic health system

Engaging residents with nurses in interprofessional performance improvement teams can improve learning and care. Residents at the University of Chicago Medicine were identified by nurses, and endorsed by program directors, to serve alongside nurses in Improving GME Nursing Interprofessional Team Experiences (IGNITE) teams. Teams met monthly with improvement coaches to implement institutionally aligned improvement plans. Institutional data was used to monitor progress. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) assessed interprofessional collaboration competency. Press Ganey Clinician Engagement (PGCE) data examined year over year differences in items related to teamwork comparing IGNITE units and non-IGNITE units. Length of stay (LOS) differences were also examined. From 2015 to 2019, IGNITE spread to 9 service lines engaging over 100 residents and nurses. Unit-based teams focused on adding nurses to attending rounds, implementing nurses-resident huddles, and improving multidisciplinary rounds. ICCAS scores significantly improved. PGCE data showed year over year improvements in composite teamwork and communication scores in IGNITE units. All adult inpatient IGNITE units saw a mean LOS reduction ranging from −0.15 days to −1.16 days, equating to an estimated cost savings of nearly 3 million dollars per quarter. Lessons learned include: 1) the importance of engaging hospital leadership; 2) the need to align collaborative practices with institutional goals; 3) the critical role of coaching; and 4) practices to ensure committed, consistent participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信