利用真实世界的数据推进癌症支持性护理的提供:粘膜炎作为一个案例研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hannah R Wardill, Steve T Sonis, Nicole M A Blijlevens
{"title":"利用真实世界的数据推进癌症支持性护理的提供:粘膜炎作为一个案例研究。","authors":"Hannah R Wardill,&nbsp;Steve T Sonis,&nbsp;Nicole M A Blijlevens","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>For decades, clinical decision making and practice has been largely informed by data generated through randomized clinical trials (RCTs). By design, RCTs are highly restricted in both scope and scale, resulting in narrow indications and iterative advances in clinical practice. With the transition to electronic health records, there are now endless opportunities to utilize these 'real world' data (RWD) to make more substantive advances in our understanding that are, by nature, more applicable to reality. This review discusses the current paradigm of using big data to advance and inform the provision of supportive cancer care, using mucositis as a case study.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Global efforts to synthesize RWD in cancer have almost exclusively focused on tumor classification and treatment efficacy, leveraging on routine tumor pathology and binary response outcomes. In contrast, clinical notes and billing codes are not as applicable to treatment side effects which require integration of both clinical and biological data, as well as patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Cancer treatment-induced toxicities are heterogeneous and complex, and as such, the use of RWD to better understand their etiology and interaction is challenging. Multidisciplinary cooperation and leadership are needed to improve data collection and governance to ensure the right data is accessible and reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using real world data to advance the provision of supportive cancer care: mucositis as a case study.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah R Wardill,&nbsp;Steve T Sonis,&nbsp;Nicole M A Blijlevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>For decades, clinical decision making and practice has been largely informed by data generated through randomized clinical trials (RCTs). By design, RCTs are highly restricted in both scope and scale, resulting in narrow indications and iterative advances in clinical practice. With the transition to electronic health records, there are now endless opportunities to utilize these 'real world' data (RWD) to make more substantive advances in our understanding that are, by nature, more applicable to reality. This review discusses the current paradigm of using big data to advance and inform the provision of supportive cancer care, using mucositis as a case study.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Global efforts to synthesize RWD in cancer have almost exclusively focused on tumor classification and treatment efficacy, leveraging on routine tumor pathology and binary response outcomes. In contrast, clinical notes and billing codes are not as applicable to treatment side effects which require integration of both clinical and biological data, as well as patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Cancer treatment-induced toxicities are heterogeneous and complex, and as such, the use of RWD to better understand their etiology and interaction is challenging. Multidisciplinary cooperation and leadership are needed to improve data collection and governance to ensure the right data is accessible and reliable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000600\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

综述目的:几十年来,临床决策和实践在很大程度上是由随机临床试验(RCT)产生的数据提供的。根据设计,随机对照试验在范围和规模上都受到高度限制,导致适应症狭窄,临床实践不断进步。随着向电子健康记录的过渡,现在有无数的机会利用这些“真实世界”数据(RWD),在我们的理解中取得更实质性的进展,从本质上讲,这些数据更适用于现实。这篇综述以粘膜炎为例,讨论了当前使用大数据来推进和告知癌症支持性护理的模式。最近的发现:全球在癌症合成RWD的努力几乎完全集中在肿瘤分类和治疗效果上,利用常规肿瘤病理学和二元反应结果。相比之下,临床记录和账单代码不适用于需要整合临床和生物数据以及患者报告结果的治疗副作用。摘要:癌症治疗诱导的毒性是异质性和复杂的,因此,使用RWD来更好地了解其病因和相互作用是具有挑战性的。需要多学科合作和领导,以改进数据收集和治理,确保正确的数据可访问和可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using real world data to advance the provision of supportive cancer care: mucositis as a case study.

Purpose of review: For decades, clinical decision making and practice has been largely informed by data generated through randomized clinical trials (RCTs). By design, RCTs are highly restricted in both scope and scale, resulting in narrow indications and iterative advances in clinical practice. With the transition to electronic health records, there are now endless opportunities to utilize these 'real world' data (RWD) to make more substantive advances in our understanding that are, by nature, more applicable to reality. This review discusses the current paradigm of using big data to advance and inform the provision of supportive cancer care, using mucositis as a case study.

Recent findings: Global efforts to synthesize RWD in cancer have almost exclusively focused on tumor classification and treatment efficacy, leveraging on routine tumor pathology and binary response outcomes. In contrast, clinical notes and billing codes are not as applicable to treatment side effects which require integration of both clinical and biological data, as well as patient-reported outcomes.

Summary: Cancer treatment-induced toxicities are heterogeneous and complex, and as such, the use of RWD to better understand their etiology and interaction is challenging. Multidisciplinary cooperation and leadership are needed to improve data collection and governance to ensure the right data is accessible and reliable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信