情感感知规则遵守文化表现规则。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Eunhee Ji, Lisa K Son, Min-Shik Kim
{"title":"情感感知规则遵守文化表现规则。","authors":"Eunhee Ji,&nbsp;Lisa K Son,&nbsp;Min-Shik Kim","doi":"10.1027/1618-3169/a000550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> The current study compared emotion perception in two cultures where display rules for emotion expression deviate. In Experiment 1, participants from America and Korea played a repeated prisoner's dilemma game with a counterpart, who was, in actuality, a programmed <i>defector</i>. Emotion expressions were exchanged via emoticons at the end of every round. After winning more points by defecting, the counterpart sent either a <i>matching</i> emoticon (a joyful face) or a <i>mismatching</i> emoticon (a regretful face). The results showed that Americans in the matching condition were more likely to defect, or to <i>punish</i>, compared to those in the mismatching condition, suggesting that more weight was given to their counterpart's <i>joyful</i> expression. This difference was smaller for Koreans, suggesting a higher disregard for the outward expression. In a second, supplementary experiment, we found that Korean participants were more likely to cooperate in the mismatching or <i>regretful</i> condition, when they thought their counterpart was a Westerner. Overall, our data suggest that emotion perception rules abide by the display rules of one's culture but are also influenced by the counterpart's culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":12173,"journal":{"name":"Experimental psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotion Perception Rules Abide by Cultural Display Rules.\",\"authors\":\"Eunhee Ji,&nbsp;Lisa K Son,&nbsp;Min-Shik Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/1618-3169/a000550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> The current study compared emotion perception in two cultures where display rules for emotion expression deviate. In Experiment 1, participants from America and Korea played a repeated prisoner's dilemma game with a counterpart, who was, in actuality, a programmed <i>defector</i>. Emotion expressions were exchanged via emoticons at the end of every round. After winning more points by defecting, the counterpart sent either a <i>matching</i> emoticon (a joyful face) or a <i>mismatching</i> emoticon (a regretful face). The results showed that Americans in the matching condition were more likely to defect, or to <i>punish</i>, compared to those in the mismatching condition, suggesting that more weight was given to their counterpart's <i>joyful</i> expression. This difference was smaller for Koreans, suggesting a higher disregard for the outward expression. In a second, supplementary experiment, we found that Korean participants were more likely to cooperate in the mismatching or <i>regretful</i> condition, when they thought their counterpart was a Westerner. Overall, our data suggest that emotion perception rules abide by the display rules of one's culture but are also influenced by the counterpart's culture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000550\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000550","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前的研究比较了两种文化中情绪表达规则不同的情绪感知。在实验1中,来自美国和韩国的参与者与另一个实际上是程序叛逃者的参与者玩了一个重复的囚徒困境游戏。在每一轮结束时,通过表情符号交换情感表达。在通过背叛赢得更多分数后,对方发送一个匹配的表情符号(一个快乐的脸)或一个不匹配的表情符号(一个遗憾的脸)。结果显示,在匹配条件下的美国人比在不匹配条件下的美国人更有可能背叛或惩罚对方,这表明他们更重视对方的快乐表情。韩国人的这一差异较小,这表明韩国人更看重外表。在第二个补充实验中,我们发现,当韩国参与者认为对方是西方人时,他们更有可能在不匹配或后悔的条件下合作。总体而言,我们的数据表明,情绪感知规则遵守自身文化的表现规则,但也受到对方文化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emotion Perception Rules Abide by Cultural Display Rules.

The current study compared emotion perception in two cultures where display rules for emotion expression deviate. In Experiment 1, participants from America and Korea played a repeated prisoner's dilemma game with a counterpart, who was, in actuality, a programmed defector. Emotion expressions were exchanged via emoticons at the end of every round. After winning more points by defecting, the counterpart sent either a matching emoticon (a joyful face) or a mismatching emoticon (a regretful face). The results showed that Americans in the matching condition were more likely to defect, or to punish, compared to those in the mismatching condition, suggesting that more weight was given to their counterpart's joyful expression. This difference was smaller for Koreans, suggesting a higher disregard for the outward expression. In a second, supplementary experiment, we found that Korean participants were more likely to cooperate in the mismatching or regretful condition, when they thought their counterpart was a Westerner. Overall, our data suggest that emotion perception rules abide by the display rules of one's culture but are also influenced by the counterpart's culture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental psychology
Experimental psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: As its name implies, Experimental Psychology (ISSN 1618-3169) publishes innovative, original, high-quality experimental research in psychology — quickly! It aims to provide a particularly fast outlet for such research, relying heavily on electronic exchange of information which begins with the electronic submission of manuscripts, and continues throughout the entire review and production process. The scope of the journal is defined by the experimental method, and so papers based on experiments from all areas of psychology are published. In addition to research articles, Experimental Psychology includes occasional theoretical and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信