内镜超声检查对胃癌分期的准确性。

Current Health Sciences Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-31 DOI:10.12865/CHSJ.48.01.13
Victor Mihai Sacerdotianu, Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu, Sevastita Iordache, Maria Monalisa Filip, Daniel Pirici, Ilona Mihaela Liliac, Adrian Saftoiu
{"title":"内镜超声检查对胃癌分期的准确性。","authors":"Victor Mihai Sacerdotianu,&nbsp;Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu,&nbsp;Sevastita Iordache,&nbsp;Maria Monalisa Filip,&nbsp;Daniel Pirici,&nbsp;Ilona Mihaela Liliac,&nbsp;Adrian Saftoiu","doi":"10.12865/CHSJ.48.01.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer remains a health problem, with treatment indications varying with the TNM stage. We aimed in this study to highlight the role of EUS in GC patients and also to calculate the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EUS for T and N staging in our group of patients with this disease. In this study, we included 41 GC patients, and individual values for every T stage accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, correct staging, understaging, and overstaging were calculated. EUS overall accuracy for T staging was 58.53%, with the highest sensitivity reached for the T4 stage, 95.83%. For N+vs. N-staging, EUS accuracy was 68.29%, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 44.44%. The positive and negative predicted values for the presence or absence of nodal disease were 82.75%, respectively 33.33%. In conclusion, this study confirmed the importance of EUS for the assessment of GC T and N stage and highlighted the role of this tool in the detection of liver micrometastasis unrevealed by other imaging techniques like abdominal ultrasound or MSCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":10938,"journal":{"name":"Current Health Sciences Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289590/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Gastric Cancer Staging.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Mihai Sacerdotianu,&nbsp;Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu,&nbsp;Sevastita Iordache,&nbsp;Maria Monalisa Filip,&nbsp;Daniel Pirici,&nbsp;Ilona Mihaela Liliac,&nbsp;Adrian Saftoiu\",\"doi\":\"10.12865/CHSJ.48.01.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gastric cancer remains a health problem, with treatment indications varying with the TNM stage. We aimed in this study to highlight the role of EUS in GC patients and also to calculate the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EUS for T and N staging in our group of patients with this disease. In this study, we included 41 GC patients, and individual values for every T stage accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, correct staging, understaging, and overstaging were calculated. EUS overall accuracy for T staging was 58.53%, with the highest sensitivity reached for the T4 stage, 95.83%. For N+vs. N-staging, EUS accuracy was 68.29%, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 44.44%. The positive and negative predicted values for the presence or absence of nodal disease were 82.75%, respectively 33.33%. In conclusion, this study confirmed the importance of EUS for the assessment of GC T and N stage and highlighted the role of this tool in the detection of liver micrometastasis unrevealed by other imaging techniques like abdominal ultrasound or MSCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Health Sciences Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9289590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Health Sciences Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.48.01.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Health Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.48.01.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

胃癌仍然是一个健康问题,治疗指征随TNM分期而异。在本研究中,我们旨在强调EUS在胃癌患者中的作用,并计算EUS对本组患者T和N分期的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。在这项研究中,我们纳入了41例胃癌患者,并计算了每个T分期的准确性、敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV、正确分期、分期不足和分期过度的个体值。EUS对T分期的总体准确率为58.53%,其中对T4分期的灵敏度最高,为95.83%。N + vs。n分期时,EUS的准确率为68.29%,敏感性为75%,特异性为44.44%。阳性预测值为82.75%,阴性预测值为33.33%。总之,本研究证实了EUS对GC T和N期评估的重要性,并强调了该工具在腹部超声或MSCT等其他成像技术未发现的肝脏微转移检测中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Gastric Cancer Staging.

Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Gastric Cancer Staging.

Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Gastric Cancer Staging.

Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Gastric Cancer Staging.

Gastric cancer remains a health problem, with treatment indications varying with the TNM stage. We aimed in this study to highlight the role of EUS in GC patients and also to calculate the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EUS for T and N staging in our group of patients with this disease. In this study, we included 41 GC patients, and individual values for every T stage accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, correct staging, understaging, and overstaging were calculated. EUS overall accuracy for T staging was 58.53%, with the highest sensitivity reached for the T4 stage, 95.83%. For N+vs. N-staging, EUS accuracy was 68.29%, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 44.44%. The positive and negative predicted values for the presence or absence of nodal disease were 82.75%, respectively 33.33%. In conclusion, this study confirmed the importance of EUS for the assessment of GC T and N stage and highlighted the role of this tool in the detection of liver micrometastasis unrevealed by other imaging techniques like abdominal ultrasound or MSCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信