Mohamed Salaheldien Mohamed Alayat, Nahla Ahmad Almatrafi, Amir Abdel Raouf El Fiky, Ahmed Mohamed Elsodany, Tamer Mohamed Shousha, Reem Basuodan
{"title":"基于微扰的训练在脑卒中患者治疗中的有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohamed Salaheldien Mohamed Alayat, Nahla Ahmad Almatrafi, Amir Abdel Raouf El Fiky, Ahmed Mohamed Elsodany, Tamer Mohamed Shousha, Reem Basuodan","doi":"10.1177/26331055221114818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of perturbation-based training (PBT) on balance and balance confidence in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searching was performed from inception to November 2021. The inclusion criteria were RCTs assessed the effectiveness of PBT in patients with stroke. Data regarding participants, intervention parameters, outcome measures, follow-up, and main results were extracted. The outcomes were balance and balance confidence. Methodological quality and quality of evidence were assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system; respectively.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>A total of 7 articles )271 patients) were included. A meta-analysis using a random-effect model was performed on 6 studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval was calculated for balance and balance confidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PEDro scale revealed 5 good-quality and 2 fair-quality studies. The currently available evidence showed significant effect of PBT in improving balance (SMD 0.60 [95% CI 0.15-1.06]; <i>P</i> = .01; very low-quality evidence) and non-significant in improving balance confidence (SMD 0.11 [95% CI -0.24 to 0.45]; <i>P</i> = .55; low-quality evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBT may improve balance in patients with stroke, however its effect on balance confidence was limited. The quality of the evidence was low or very low with little confidence in the effect estimate, which suggests further high-quality trials are required.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration number (CRD42021291474).</p>","PeriodicalId":36527,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/1d/10.1177_26331055221114818.PMC9329815.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Perturbation-Based Training in the Treatment of Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Salaheldien Mohamed Alayat, Nahla Ahmad Almatrafi, Amir Abdel Raouf El Fiky, Ahmed Mohamed Elsodany, Tamer Mohamed Shousha, Reem Basuodan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26331055221114818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of perturbation-based training (PBT) on balance and balance confidence in patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searching was performed from inception to November 2021. The inclusion criteria were RCTs assessed the effectiveness of PBT in patients with stroke. Data regarding participants, intervention parameters, outcome measures, follow-up, and main results were extracted. The outcomes were balance and balance confidence. Methodological quality and quality of evidence were assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system; respectively.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>A total of 7 articles )271 patients) were included. A meta-analysis using a random-effect model was performed on 6 studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval was calculated for balance and balance confidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PEDro scale revealed 5 good-quality and 2 fair-quality studies. The currently available evidence showed significant effect of PBT in improving balance (SMD 0.60 [95% CI 0.15-1.06]; <i>P</i> = .01; very low-quality evidence) and non-significant in improving balance confidence (SMD 0.11 [95% CI -0.24 to 0.45]; <i>P</i> = .55; low-quality evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBT may improve balance in patients with stroke, however its effect on balance confidence was limited. The quality of the evidence was low or very low with little confidence in the effect estimate, which suggests further high-quality trials are required.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration number (CRD42021291474).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience Insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/1d/10.1177_26331055221114818.PMC9329815.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26331055221114818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26331055221114818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:探讨微扰训练(PBT)对脑卒中患者平衡能力和平衡信心的影响。方法:系统检索自成立至2021年11月。纳入标准是评估PBT在卒中患者中的有效性的随机对照试验。提取有关参与者、干预参数、结局测量、随访和主要结果的数据。结果是平衡和平衡信心。采用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表和建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)系统评估方法学质量和证据质量;分别。资料分析:共纳入7篇文章(271例患者)。采用随机效应模型对6项研究进行meta分析。对平衡和平衡置信度计算95%置信区间的标准化平均差(SMD)。结果:PEDro量表显示5项高质量研究和2项中等质量研究。现有证据显示PBT在改善平衡方面有显著效果(SMD 0.60 [95% CI 0.15-1.06];p = .01;非常低质量的证据),在改善平衡置信度方面不显著(SMD 0.11 [95% CI -0.24至0.45];p = .55;低质量证据)。结论:PBT可改善脑卒中患者的平衡能力,但对平衡信心的影响有限。证据的质量很低或非常低,对效果估计几乎没有信心,这表明需要进一步的高质量试验。注册:普洛斯彼罗注册号(CRD42021291474)。
The Effectiveness of Perturbation-Based Training in the Treatment of Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of perturbation-based training (PBT) on balance and balance confidence in patients with stroke.
Methods: Systematic searching was performed from inception to November 2021. The inclusion criteria were RCTs assessed the effectiveness of PBT in patients with stroke. Data regarding participants, intervention parameters, outcome measures, follow-up, and main results were extracted. The outcomes were balance and balance confidence. Methodological quality and quality of evidence were assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system; respectively.
Data analysis: A total of 7 articles )271 patients) were included. A meta-analysis using a random-effect model was performed on 6 studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval was calculated for balance and balance confidence.
Results: PEDro scale revealed 5 good-quality and 2 fair-quality studies. The currently available evidence showed significant effect of PBT in improving balance (SMD 0.60 [95% CI 0.15-1.06]; P = .01; very low-quality evidence) and non-significant in improving balance confidence (SMD 0.11 [95% CI -0.24 to 0.45]; P = .55; low-quality evidence).
Conclusion: PBT may improve balance in patients with stroke, however its effect on balance confidence was limited. The quality of the evidence was low or very low with little confidence in the effect estimate, which suggests further high-quality trials are required.
Registration: PROSPERO registration number (CRD42021291474).