常规系统性前列腺活检未被磁共振成像靶向活检所取代。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
David Gómez-Ortiz, Adrián M Garza-Gangemi, Mariano Oropeza-Aguilar, Sergio Rangel-Suárez, Verónica Espinosa-Cruz, Antonio C Villegas-Hernández, Ricardo Martínez-Martínez, Ricardo A Castillejos-Molina
{"title":"常规系统性前列腺活检未被磁共振成像靶向活检所取代。","authors":"David Gómez-Ortiz,&nbsp;Adrián M Garza-Gangemi,&nbsp;Mariano Oropeza-Aguilar,&nbsp;Sergio Rangel-Suárez,&nbsp;Verónica Espinosa-Cruz,&nbsp;Antonio C Villegas-Hernández,&nbsp;Ricardo Martínez-Martínez,&nbsp;Ricardo A Castillejos-Molina","doi":"10.24875/RIC.22000084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging improves the performance of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics through a better selection of patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to study the detection rate (DR) of systematic and targeted cognitive biopsies in a cohort with the previous negative systematic biopsies. A secondary objective was to describe the value of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) in the detection of clinically significant PCa (CSPCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a prospective, single-center, and comparative study to determine the DR of systematic and targeted cognitive biopsies. The clinical and pathological characteristics of each patient were described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System lesions > 3 were included in the study. PCa was detected in 41.4% (46 of 111 patients); 42 (91.3%) were detected by systematic biopsy and 30 (65.2%) by targeted biopsy. CSPCa was detected in 26 (23.4%), 23 (88.5%) by systematic biopsy, and 21 (76.9%) by targeted biopsy. PSAd > 0.15 was directly associated with CSPCa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The detection of PCa by systematic biopsy in this series was higher than 80%; hence, its routine use should not be replaced by targeted biopsy, since it continues to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis in patients with prior negative biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49612,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Investigacion Clinica-Clinical and Translational Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"212-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine systematic prostate biopsies not replaced by magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy.\",\"authors\":\"David Gómez-Ortiz,&nbsp;Adrián M Garza-Gangemi,&nbsp;Mariano Oropeza-Aguilar,&nbsp;Sergio Rangel-Suárez,&nbsp;Verónica Espinosa-Cruz,&nbsp;Antonio C Villegas-Hernández,&nbsp;Ricardo Martínez-Martínez,&nbsp;Ricardo A Castillejos-Molina\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/RIC.22000084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging improves the performance of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics through a better selection of patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to study the detection rate (DR) of systematic and targeted cognitive biopsies in a cohort with the previous negative systematic biopsies. A secondary objective was to describe the value of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) in the detection of clinically significant PCa (CSPCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a prospective, single-center, and comparative study to determine the DR of systematic and targeted cognitive biopsies. The clinical and pathological characteristics of each patient were described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System lesions > 3 were included in the study. PCa was detected in 41.4% (46 of 111 patients); 42 (91.3%) were detected by systematic biopsy and 30 (65.2%) by targeted biopsy. CSPCa was detected in 26 (23.4%), 23 (88.5%) by systematic biopsy, and 21 (76.9%) by targeted biopsy. PSAd > 0.15 was directly associated with CSPCa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The detection of PCa by systematic biopsy in this series was higher than 80%; hence, its routine use should not be replaced by targeted biopsy, since it continues to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis in patients with prior negative biopsies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Investigacion Clinica-Clinical and Translational Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"212-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Investigacion Clinica-Clinical and Translational Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/RIC.22000084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Investigacion Clinica-Clinical and Translational Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/RIC.22000084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多参数磁共振成像通过更好地选择患者来提高前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断性能。目的:本研究的目的是在既往系统活检阴性的队列中研究系统和靶向认知活检的检出率(DR)。第二个目的是描述前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAd)在检测临床显著性前列腺癌(CSPCa)中的价值。方法:我们设计了一项前瞻性、单中心、比较研究,以确定系统和靶向认知活检的DR。描述了每位患者的临床和病理特征。结果:共纳入111例前列腺影像学报告和数据系统病变> 3的患者。41.4%(111例患者中46例)检出前列腺癌;系统活检42例(91.3%),靶向活检30例(65.2%)。系统活检检出CSPCa 26例(23.4%),23例(88.5%),靶向活检21例(76.9%)。PSAd > 0.15与CSPCa直接相关。结论:本组前列腺癌系统活检检出率均高于80%;因此,它的常规使用不应被靶向活检所取代,因为它仍然是既往活检阴性患者诊断的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Routine systematic prostate biopsies not replaced by magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy.

Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging improves the performance of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics through a better selection of patients.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to study the detection rate (DR) of systematic and targeted cognitive biopsies in a cohort with the previous negative systematic biopsies. A secondary objective was to describe the value of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) in the detection of clinically significant PCa (CSPCa).

Methods: We designed a prospective, single-center, and comparative study to determine the DR of systematic and targeted cognitive biopsies. The clinical and pathological characteristics of each patient were described.

Results: A total of 111 patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System lesions > 3 were included in the study. PCa was detected in 41.4% (46 of 111 patients); 42 (91.3%) were detected by systematic biopsy and 30 (65.2%) by targeted biopsy. CSPCa was detected in 26 (23.4%), 23 (88.5%) by systematic biopsy, and 21 (76.9%) by targeted biopsy. PSAd > 0.15 was directly associated with CSPCa.

Conclusion: The detection of PCa by systematic biopsy in this series was higher than 80%; hence, its routine use should not be replaced by targeted biopsy, since it continues to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis in patients with prior negative biopsies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Investigación Clínica – Clinical and Translational Investigation (RIC-C&TI), publishes original clinical and biomedical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, surgery, and any of their specialties. The Revista de Investigación Clínica – Clinical and Translational Investigation is the official journal of the National Institutes of Health of Mexico, which comprises a group of Institutes and High Specialty Hospitals belonging to the Ministery of Health. The journal is published both on-line and in printed version, appears bimonthly and publishes peer-reviewed original research articles as well as brief and in-depth reviews. All articles published are open access and can be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. The journal accepts clinical and molecular research articles, short reports and reviews. Types of manuscripts: – Brief Communications – Research Letters – Original Articles – Brief Reviews – In-depth Reviews – Perspectives – Letters to the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信