胸膜液乳酸脱氢酶与腺苷脱氨酶比值在鉴别胸腔积液病因中的作用。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Chun-Yee Ho, Yu-Hui Tsai, Chih-Chun Chang, Huei-Ling Huang, N-Chi Tan, Wei-Chi Chen, Ka-I Leong
{"title":"胸膜液乳酸脱氢酶与腺苷脱氨酶比值在鉴别胸腔积液病因中的作用。","authors":"Chun-Yee Ho,&nbsp;Yu-Hui Tsai,&nbsp;Chih-Chun Chang,&nbsp;Huei-Ling Huang,&nbsp;N-Chi Tan,&nbsp;Wei-Chi Chen,&nbsp;Ka-I Leong","doi":"10.4103/cjp.cjp_104_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exudative pleural effusion includes tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), parapneumonic pleural effusion (PPE), and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). An elevated pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) typically implies TPE, but the rule may not apply to every individual case. Recent studies proposed that the pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-to-ADA ratio showed a higher diagnostic power than pleural fluid ADA alone in differentiating the etiology of pleural effusion. Hence, we aimed to investigate the performance of pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio as a biomarker in assistance with the diagnosis of TPE, PPE, and MPE. All patients who underwent thoracentesis for the first time with a pleural fluid ADA >40 U/L were included in this retrospective study. The clinical data including pleural fluid ADA and LDH-to-ADA ratio were analyzed. A total of 311 patients were enrolled during the study interval. The pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio <14.2 (sensitivity: 74.2%; specificity: 90.4%) favored TPE, while the pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio >14.5 (sensitivity: 79.9%; specificity: 78.5%) favored PPE. Besides, the pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio >46.7 (sensitivity: 56.3%; specificity: 78.3%) favored MPE owing to primary lung cancers. In conclusion, the pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio was an effective indicator in differentiating the etiology of pleural effusions in the cases of high ADA level in the pleural fluid.</p>","PeriodicalId":10251,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase-to-adenosine deaminase ratio in differentiating the etiology of pleural effusions.\",\"authors\":\"Chun-Yee Ho,&nbsp;Yu-Hui Tsai,&nbsp;Chih-Chun Chang,&nbsp;Huei-Ling Huang,&nbsp;N-Chi Tan,&nbsp;Wei-Chi Chen,&nbsp;Ka-I Leong\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/cjp.cjp_104_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Exudative pleural effusion includes tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), parapneumonic pleural effusion (PPE), and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). An elevated pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) typically implies TPE, but the rule may not apply to every individual case. Recent studies proposed that the pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-to-ADA ratio showed a higher diagnostic power than pleural fluid ADA alone in differentiating the etiology of pleural effusion. Hence, we aimed to investigate the performance of pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio as a biomarker in assistance with the diagnosis of TPE, PPE, and MPE. All patients who underwent thoracentesis for the first time with a pleural fluid ADA >40 U/L were included in this retrospective study. The clinical data including pleural fluid ADA and LDH-to-ADA ratio were analyzed. A total of 311 patients were enrolled during the study interval. The pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio <14.2 (sensitivity: 74.2%; specificity: 90.4%) favored TPE, while the pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio >14.5 (sensitivity: 79.9%; specificity: 78.5%) favored PPE. Besides, the pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio >46.7 (sensitivity: 56.3%; specificity: 78.3%) favored MPE owing to primary lung cancers. In conclusion, the pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio was an effective indicator in differentiating the etiology of pleural effusions in the cases of high ADA level in the pleural fluid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjp.cjp_104_21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjp.cjp_104_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

渗出性胸腔积液包括结核性胸腔积液(TPE)、肺旁胸腔积液(PPE)和恶性胸腔积液(MPE)。胸膜液腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)升高通常意味着TPE,但该规则可能并不适用于每个病例。最近的研究表明,胸膜液乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)与ADA比值在鉴别胸腔积液病因方面比单独胸膜液ADA具有更高的诊断能力。因此,我们的目的是研究胸膜液ldh / ada比值作为TPE、PPE和MPE诊断的生物标志物的性能。所有首次行胸腔穿刺且胸水ADA >40 U/L的患者均纳入本回顾性研究。分析临床资料,包括胸水ADA和ldl / ADA比值。在研究期间,共有311名患者入组。胸膜液ldh / ada比值为14.5(敏感性:79.9%;特异性:78.5%)倾向于PPE。胸膜液ldh / ada比值>46.7(敏感性56.3%;特异性:78.3%)由于原发性肺癌倾向于MPE。综上所述,胸膜液ldl / ADA比值是鉴别胸膜液高ADA病因的有效指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase-to-adenosine deaminase ratio in differentiating the etiology of pleural effusions.

Exudative pleural effusion includes tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), parapneumonic pleural effusion (PPE), and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). An elevated pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) typically implies TPE, but the rule may not apply to every individual case. Recent studies proposed that the pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-to-ADA ratio showed a higher diagnostic power than pleural fluid ADA alone in differentiating the etiology of pleural effusion. Hence, we aimed to investigate the performance of pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio as a biomarker in assistance with the diagnosis of TPE, PPE, and MPE. All patients who underwent thoracentesis for the first time with a pleural fluid ADA >40 U/L were included in this retrospective study. The clinical data including pleural fluid ADA and LDH-to-ADA ratio were analyzed. A total of 311 patients were enrolled during the study interval. The pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio <14.2 (sensitivity: 74.2%; specificity: 90.4%) favored TPE, while the pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio >14.5 (sensitivity: 79.9%; specificity: 78.5%) favored PPE. Besides, the pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio >46.7 (sensitivity: 56.3%; specificity: 78.3%) favored MPE owing to primary lung cancers. In conclusion, the pleural fluid LDH-to-ADA ratio was an effective indicator in differentiating the etiology of pleural effusions in the cases of high ADA level in the pleural fluid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Physiology is a multidisciplinary open access journal. Chinese Journal of Physiology (CJP) publishes high quality original research papers in physiology and pathophysiology by authors all over the world. CJP welcomes submitted research papers in all aspects of physiology science in the molecular, cellular, tissue and systemic levels. Multidisciplinary sciences with a focus to understand the role of physiology in health and disease are also encouraged. Chinese Journal of Physiology accepts fourfold article types: Original Article, Review Article (Mini-Review included), Short Communication, and Editorial. There is no cost for readers to access the full-text contents of publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信