冷却程序对热固化聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯义齿基托材料单体洗脱的影响。

Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB Pub Date : 2022-07-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0161
Nick Polychronakis, Maria Dimitriadi, Gregory Polyzois, George Eliades
{"title":"冷却程序对热固化聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯义齿基托材料单体洗脱的影响。","authors":"Nick Polychronakis,&nbsp;Maria Dimitriadi,&nbsp;Gregory Polyzois,&nbsp;George Eliades","doi":"10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the amount of methyl methacrylate (MMA) released in water from heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base materials subjected to different cooling procedures.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Disk-shaped specimens (Ø:17 mm, h:2 mm) were fabricated from Paladon 65 (PA), ProBase Hot (PB), Stellon QC-20 (QC) and Vertex Rapid Simplified (VE) denture materials using five different cooling procedures (n=3/procedure): A) Bench-cooling for 10 min and then under running water for 15 min; B) Cooling in water-bath until room temperature; C) Cooling under running water for 15 min; D) Bench-cooling, and E) Bench-cooling for 30 min and under running water for 15 min. A, B, D, E procedures were proposed by the manufacturers, while the C was selected as the fastest one. Control specimens (n=3/material) were fabricated using a long polymerization cycle and bench-cooling. After deflasking, the specimens were ground, polished and stored in individual containers with 10 ml of distilled water for seven days (37oC). The amount of water-eluted MMA was measured per container using isocratic ultra-fast liquid chromatography (UFLC). Data were analyzed using Student's and Welch's t-test (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MMA values below the lower quantification limit (LoQ=5.9 ppm) were registered in B, C, E (PA); E (PB) and B, D, E (QC) procedures, whereas values below the detection limit (LoD=1.96 ppm) were registered in A, D (PA); A, B, C, D (PB); C, D, E (VE) and in all specimens of the control group. A, B (VE) and A, C (QC) procedures yielded values ranging from 6.4 to 13.2 ppm with insignificant differences in material and procedure factors (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cooling procedures may affect the monomer elution from denture base materials. The Ε procedure may be considered a universal cooling procedure compared to the ones proposed by the manufacturers, with the lowest residual monomer elution in water.</p>","PeriodicalId":321675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB","volume":" ","pages":"e20220161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of cooling procedures on monomer elution from heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials.\",\"authors\":\"Nick Polychronakis,&nbsp;Maria Dimitriadi,&nbsp;Gregory Polyzois,&nbsp;George Eliades\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the amount of methyl methacrylate (MMA) released in water from heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base materials subjected to different cooling procedures.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Disk-shaped specimens (Ø:17 mm, h:2 mm) were fabricated from Paladon 65 (PA), ProBase Hot (PB), Stellon QC-20 (QC) and Vertex Rapid Simplified (VE) denture materials using five different cooling procedures (n=3/procedure): A) Bench-cooling for 10 min and then under running water for 15 min; B) Cooling in water-bath until room temperature; C) Cooling under running water for 15 min; D) Bench-cooling, and E) Bench-cooling for 30 min and under running water for 15 min. A, B, D, E procedures were proposed by the manufacturers, while the C was selected as the fastest one. Control specimens (n=3/material) were fabricated using a long polymerization cycle and bench-cooling. After deflasking, the specimens were ground, polished and stored in individual containers with 10 ml of distilled water for seven days (37oC). The amount of water-eluted MMA was measured per container using isocratic ultra-fast liquid chromatography (UFLC). Data were analyzed using Student's and Welch's t-test (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MMA values below the lower quantification limit (LoQ=5.9 ppm) were registered in B, C, E (PA); E (PB) and B, D, E (QC) procedures, whereas values below the detection limit (LoD=1.96 ppm) were registered in A, D (PA); A, B, C, D (PB); C, D, E (VE) and in all specimens of the control group. A, B (VE) and A, C (QC) procedures yielded values ranging from 6.4 to 13.2 ppm with insignificant differences in material and procedure factors (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cooling procedures may affect the monomer elution from denture base materials. The Ε procedure may be considered a universal cooling procedure compared to the ones proposed by the manufacturers, with the lowest residual monomer elution in water.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e20220161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311270/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价热固化聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)义齿基托材料经不同冷却方式后的水中甲基丙烯酸甲酯(MMA)释放量。方法:采用Paladon 65 (PA)、ProBase Hot (PB)、Stellon QC-20 (QC)和Vertex Rapid Simplified (VE)材料,采用5种不同的冷却程序(n=3/程序)制备盘状标本(Ø:17 mm, h:2 mm): A)台式冷却10 min,然后在流动水中冷却15 min;B)在水浴中冷却至室温;C)自来水冷却15分钟;D)台式冷却,E)台式冷却30分钟,自来水下冷却15分钟。厂家提出了A、B、D、E四个流程,选择C为最快的流程。对照样品(n=3/材料)采用长聚合周期和台式冷却制备。剥落后,将标本研磨、抛光,放入单独的容器中,用10 ml蒸馏水保存7天(37℃)。采用等容超快速液相色谱法(UFLC)测定每个容器的MMA水洗脱量。数据采用Student’st检验和Welch’st检验(α=0.05)。结果:B、C、E (PA)中MMA值均低于定量下限(LoQ=5.9 ppm);E (PB)和B、D、E (QC)程序,而低于检出限(LoD=1.96 ppm)的值记录在A、D (PA)程序中;A, b, c, d (pb);C, D, E (VE),对照组所有标本均无明显差异。A、B (VE)和A、C (QC)程序产生的值在6.4 ~ 13.2 ppm之间,材料和程序因素差异不显著(p>0.05)。结论:冷却过程可能影响义齿基托材料中单体的洗脱。与制造商提出的冷却方法相比,Ε程序可以被认为是一种通用的冷却程序,其在水中的残留单体洗脱量最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effect of cooling procedures on monomer elution from heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials.

The effect of cooling procedures on monomer elution from heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials.

The effect of cooling procedures on monomer elution from heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials.

The effect of cooling procedures on monomer elution from heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials.

Objective: To evaluate the amount of methyl methacrylate (MMA) released in water from heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base materials subjected to different cooling procedures.

Methodology: Disk-shaped specimens (Ø:17 mm, h:2 mm) were fabricated from Paladon 65 (PA), ProBase Hot (PB), Stellon QC-20 (QC) and Vertex Rapid Simplified (VE) denture materials using five different cooling procedures (n=3/procedure): A) Bench-cooling for 10 min and then under running water for 15 min; B) Cooling in water-bath until room temperature; C) Cooling under running water for 15 min; D) Bench-cooling, and E) Bench-cooling for 30 min and under running water for 15 min. A, B, D, E procedures were proposed by the manufacturers, while the C was selected as the fastest one. Control specimens (n=3/material) were fabricated using a long polymerization cycle and bench-cooling. After deflasking, the specimens were ground, polished and stored in individual containers with 10 ml of distilled water for seven days (37oC). The amount of water-eluted MMA was measured per container using isocratic ultra-fast liquid chromatography (UFLC). Data were analyzed using Student's and Welch's t-test (α=0.05).

Results: MMA values below the lower quantification limit (LoQ=5.9 ppm) were registered in B, C, E (PA); E (PB) and B, D, E (QC) procedures, whereas values below the detection limit (LoD=1.96 ppm) were registered in A, D (PA); A, B, C, D (PB); C, D, E (VE) and in all specimens of the control group. A, B (VE) and A, C (QC) procedures yielded values ranging from 6.4 to 13.2 ppm with insignificant differences in material and procedure factors (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The cooling procedures may affect the monomer elution from denture base materials. The Ε procedure may be considered a universal cooling procedure compared to the ones proposed by the manufacturers, with the lowest residual monomer elution in water.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信