动静脉瘘和动静脉移植物术后偷窃综合征的发生率。

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2022-06-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Abbas Saroukhani, Aryan Rafiee Zadeh, Seyed-Masoud-Reza Ahmadi
{"title":"动静脉瘘和动静脉移植物术后偷窃综合征的发生率。","authors":"Abbas Saroukhani,&nbsp;Aryan Rafiee Zadeh,&nbsp;Seyed-Masoud-Reza Ahmadi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal failure is one of the dangerous chronic diseases that different solutions are used for dialysis in these patients. Arteriovenous graft (AVG) and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) are two communication methods for dialysis in these patients, associated with pain, sensory and Pulse disturbances, and even limb necrosis. Using cubital AVF and AVG for hemodialysis is a critical issue in vascular surgery. Arterial steal syndrome is an essential medical condition requiring surgical interventions. In this research project, we decided to measure the incidence of steal syndrome among AVF and AVG patients and compare them with each other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study was performed in Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, from 2018 to 2020. Two hundred one patients undergoing AVF or AVG were included, and patients were followed for six months. The frequency of pain symptoms, anesthesia and pulse disorders, necrosis of the limbs, and the frequency of steal syndrome were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the studied patients, 2 cases in the AVF group and 10 cases in the AVG group had steal syndrome, and there was a significant difference between the two groups based on the frequency of steal syndrome (P=0.007). Also, there was a considerable difference between the two groups based on the pulse disorder (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of symptoms of sensory impairment, pain, and evidence of necrosis (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVF technique is better than AVG in creating symptoms of steal syndrome, and also, the number of symptoms such as pulse disorder was relatively less seen in the AVF method.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301160/pdf/ijbt0012-0121.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of steal syndrome following arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft.\",\"authors\":\"Abbas Saroukhani,&nbsp;Aryan Rafiee Zadeh,&nbsp;Seyed-Masoud-Reza Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal failure is one of the dangerous chronic diseases that different solutions are used for dialysis in these patients. Arteriovenous graft (AVG) and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) are two communication methods for dialysis in these patients, associated with pain, sensory and Pulse disturbances, and even limb necrosis. Using cubital AVF and AVG for hemodialysis is a critical issue in vascular surgery. Arterial steal syndrome is an essential medical condition requiring surgical interventions. In this research project, we decided to measure the incidence of steal syndrome among AVF and AVG patients and compare them with each other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study was performed in Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, from 2018 to 2020. Two hundred one patients undergoing AVF or AVG were included, and patients were followed for six months. The frequency of pain symptoms, anesthesia and pulse disorders, necrosis of the limbs, and the frequency of steal syndrome were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the studied patients, 2 cases in the AVF group and 10 cases in the AVG group had steal syndrome, and there was a significant difference between the two groups based on the frequency of steal syndrome (P=0.007). Also, there was a considerable difference between the two groups based on the pulse disorder (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of symptoms of sensory impairment, pain, and evidence of necrosis (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVF technique is better than AVG in creating symptoms of steal syndrome, and also, the number of symptoms such as pulse disorder was relatively less seen in the AVF method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301160/pdf/ijbt0012-0121.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾功能衰竭是一种危险的慢性疾病,对这些患者采用不同的透析溶液。动静脉移植物(AVG)和动静脉瘘(AVF)是这类患者透析的两种沟通方式,伴有疼痛、感觉和脉搏紊乱,甚至肢体坏死。利用肘AVF和AVG进行血液透析是血管外科的关键问题。动脉偷窃综合征是一种必要的医疗条件,需要手术干预。在本研究项目中,我们决定测量AVF和AVG患者的偷血综合征发生率,并进行比较。方法:本队列研究于2018 - 2020年在伊朗伊斯法罕Al-Zahra医院进行。221例接受AVF或AVG的患者被纳入研究,随访6个月。评估疼痛症状、麻醉和脉搏紊乱、肢体坏死的频率以及偷窃综合征的频率。结果:在所研究的患者中,AVF组2例,AVG组10例出现偷血综合征,两组在偷血综合征发生频率上差异有统计学意义(P=0.007)。两组脉搏紊乱程度差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:AVF技术比AVG技术更能产生偷血综合征的症状,而且AVF技术出现脉搏紊乱等症状的次数也相对较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of steal syndrome following arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft.

Background: Renal failure is one of the dangerous chronic diseases that different solutions are used for dialysis in these patients. Arteriovenous graft (AVG) and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) are two communication methods for dialysis in these patients, associated with pain, sensory and Pulse disturbances, and even limb necrosis. Using cubital AVF and AVG for hemodialysis is a critical issue in vascular surgery. Arterial steal syndrome is an essential medical condition requiring surgical interventions. In this research project, we decided to measure the incidence of steal syndrome among AVF and AVG patients and compare them with each other.

Methods: This cohort study was performed in Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, from 2018 to 2020. Two hundred one patients undergoing AVF or AVG were included, and patients were followed for six months. The frequency of pain symptoms, anesthesia and pulse disorders, necrosis of the limbs, and the frequency of steal syndrome were assessed.

Results: Among the studied patients, 2 cases in the AVF group and 10 cases in the AVG group had steal syndrome, and there was a significant difference between the two groups based on the frequency of steal syndrome (P=0.007). Also, there was a considerable difference between the two groups based on the pulse disorder (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of symptoms of sensory impairment, pain, and evidence of necrosis (P>0.05).

Conclusion: AVF technique is better than AVG in creating symptoms of steal syndrome, and also, the number of symptoms such as pulse disorder was relatively less seen in the AVF method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信