成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征的治疗:2期和3期试验的叙述性回顾。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-28 DOI:10.1080/14728214.2022.2105833
Denise Battaglini, Chiara Robba, Paolo Pelosi, Patricia R M Rocco
{"title":"成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征的治疗:2期和3期试验的叙述性回顾。","authors":"Denise Battaglini,&nbsp;Chiara Robba,&nbsp;Paolo Pelosi,&nbsp;Patricia R M Rocco","doi":"10.1080/14728214.2022.2105833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ventilatory management and general supportive care of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the adult population have led to significant clinical improvements, but morbidity and mortality remain high. Pharmacologic strategies acting on the coagulation cascade, inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial cell injury have been targeted in the last decade for patients with ARDS, but only a few of these have shown potential benefits with a meaningful clinical response and improved patient outcomes. The lack of availability of specific pharmacologic treatments for ARDS can be attributed to its complex pathophysiology, different risk factors, huge heterogeneity, and difficult classification into specific biological phenotypes and genotypes.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this narrative review, we briefly discuss the relevance and current advances in pharmacologic treatments for ARDS in adults and the need for the development of new pharmacological strategies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Identification of ARDS phenotypes, risk factors, heterogeneity, and pathophysiology may help to design clinical trials personalized according to ARDS-specific features, thus hopefully decreasing the rate of failed clinical pharmacologic trials. This concept is still under clinical investigation and needs further development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12292,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"187-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: a narrative review of phase 2 and 3 trials.\",\"authors\":\"Denise Battaglini,&nbsp;Chiara Robba,&nbsp;Paolo Pelosi,&nbsp;Patricia R M Rocco\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14728214.2022.2105833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ventilatory management and general supportive care of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the adult population have led to significant clinical improvements, but morbidity and mortality remain high. Pharmacologic strategies acting on the coagulation cascade, inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial cell injury have been targeted in the last decade for patients with ARDS, but only a few of these have shown potential benefits with a meaningful clinical response and improved patient outcomes. The lack of availability of specific pharmacologic treatments for ARDS can be attributed to its complex pathophysiology, different risk factors, huge heterogeneity, and difficult classification into specific biological phenotypes and genotypes.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this narrative review, we briefly discuss the relevance and current advances in pharmacologic treatments for ARDS in adults and the need for the development of new pharmacological strategies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Identification of ARDS phenotypes, risk factors, heterogeneity, and pathophysiology may help to design clinical trials personalized according to ARDS-specific features, thus hopefully decreasing the rate of failed clinical pharmacologic trials. This concept is still under clinical investigation and needs further development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"187-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728214.2022.2105833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728214.2022.2105833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的通气管理和一般支持性护理已导致显著的临床改善,但发病率和死亡率仍然很高。在过去的十年中,针对ARDS患者的凝血级联、炎症、氧化应激和内皮细胞损伤的药物策略已经成为目标,但其中只有少数显示出潜在的益处,具有有意义的临床反应和改善患者预后。由于ARDS的病理生理复杂,危险因素不同,异质性大,难以分类为特定的生物学表型和基因型,因此缺乏特异性的药物治疗。涵盖领域:在这篇叙述性综述中,我们简要讨论了成人ARDS药物治疗的相关性和当前进展,以及开发新药物策略的必要性。专家意见:识别ARDS的表型、危险因素、异质性和病理生理学,有助于根据ARDS的具体特征设计个性化的临床试验,从而有望降低临床药物试验的失败率。这一概念仍处于临床研究阶段,需要进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: a narrative review of phase 2 and 3 trials.

Introduction: Ventilatory management and general supportive care of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the adult population have led to significant clinical improvements, but morbidity and mortality remain high. Pharmacologic strategies acting on the coagulation cascade, inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial cell injury have been targeted in the last decade for patients with ARDS, but only a few of these have shown potential benefits with a meaningful clinical response and improved patient outcomes. The lack of availability of specific pharmacologic treatments for ARDS can be attributed to its complex pathophysiology, different risk factors, huge heterogeneity, and difficult classification into specific biological phenotypes and genotypes.

Areas covered: In this narrative review, we briefly discuss the relevance and current advances in pharmacologic treatments for ARDS in adults and the need for the development of new pharmacological strategies.

Expert opinion: Identification of ARDS phenotypes, risk factors, heterogeneity, and pathophysiology may help to design clinical trials personalized according to ARDS-specific features, thus hopefully decreasing the rate of failed clinical pharmacologic trials. This concept is still under clinical investigation and needs further development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs (ISSN 1472-8214 [print], 1744-7623 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing structured reviews on Phase II and Phase III drugs/drug classes emerging onto the market across all therapy areas, providing expert opinion on their potential impact on the current management of specific diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信