新世界猴(Platyrrhini)的食土行为:生态和地理模式。

Stephen F Ferrari, Liza M Veiga, Bernardo Urbani
{"title":"新世界猴(Platyrrhini)的食土行为:生态和地理模式。","authors":"Stephen F Ferrari,&nbsp;Liza M Veiga,&nbsp;Bernardo Urbani","doi":"10.1159/000141901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Geophagy has been recorded in an increasing number of New World monkeys (Platyrrhini) over recent years, permitting a tentative analysis of ecological patterns. While geophagy has now been recorded in species representing all 4 platyrrhine families and a majority of genera, there is a marked tendency for it to occur in the larger-bodied Pitheciidae and Atelidae. Howlers (Alouatta) are responsible for almost a third of reports, which are concentrated in the more frugivorous species, Alouatta belzebul and Alouatta seniculus. Geophagy may also be relatively common in the spider monkeys (Ateles) and the pitheciids, which are specialised frugivores and seed predators, respectively. An overview of the available data points to a marked Amazonian bias, allowing for geographical differences in the number of species and field studies. This pattern is demonstrated most emphatically by Alouatta, for which there are almost as many reports as field studies in the Amazon basin, in stark contrast with Central American sites, which have a long tradition of fieldwork, but no published records of geophagy. There are also relatively few reports from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Despite the growth in reports, and the patterns identified here, the functional aspects of geophagy in the platyrrhines still remain unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":520627,"journal":{"name":"Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology","volume":" ","pages":"402-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000141901","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geophagy in new world monkeys (Platyrrhini): ecological and geographic patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen F Ferrari,&nbsp;Liza M Veiga,&nbsp;Bernardo Urbani\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000141901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Geophagy has been recorded in an increasing number of New World monkeys (Platyrrhini) over recent years, permitting a tentative analysis of ecological patterns. While geophagy has now been recorded in species representing all 4 platyrrhine families and a majority of genera, there is a marked tendency for it to occur in the larger-bodied Pitheciidae and Atelidae. Howlers (Alouatta) are responsible for almost a third of reports, which are concentrated in the more frugivorous species, Alouatta belzebul and Alouatta seniculus. Geophagy may also be relatively common in the spider monkeys (Ateles) and the pitheciids, which are specialised frugivores and seed predators, respectively. An overview of the available data points to a marked Amazonian bias, allowing for geographical differences in the number of species and field studies. This pattern is demonstrated most emphatically by Alouatta, for which there are almost as many reports as field studies in the Amazon basin, in stark contrast with Central American sites, which have a long tradition of fieldwork, but no published records of geophagy. There are also relatively few reports from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Despite the growth in reports, and the patterns identified here, the functional aspects of geophagy in the platyrrhines still remain unclear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"402-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000141901\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000141901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000141901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

近年来,越来越多的新世界猴(Platyrrhini)有食土行为的记录,这使得对生态模式的初步分析成为可能。虽然目前已记录的食土行为在所有4个platyrrhine科和大多数属的物种中都有,但在体型较大的Pitheciidae和Atelidae中有明显趋势。吼叫者(Alouatta)几乎占报告的三分之一,这些报告集中在更多的果食性物种,Alouatta belzebul和Alouatta seniculus。食土行为在蜘蛛猴和猿类中也相对普遍,它们分别是专门的食果动物和种子捕食者。对现有数据的概述表明,考虑到物种数量和实地研究的地理差异,存在明显的亚马逊偏差。这种模式在Alouatta得到了最突出的证明,在亚马逊流域有几乎和实地研究一样多的报告,与中美洲的遗址形成鲜明对比,中美洲有长期的实地调查传统,但没有公布的食土记录。来自巴西大西洋森林的报告也相对较少。尽管有越来越多的报道,这里也发现了食土的模式,但长颈犀牛食土的功能方面仍然不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geophagy in new world monkeys (Platyrrhini): ecological and geographic patterns.

Geophagy has been recorded in an increasing number of New World monkeys (Platyrrhini) over recent years, permitting a tentative analysis of ecological patterns. While geophagy has now been recorded in species representing all 4 platyrrhine families and a majority of genera, there is a marked tendency for it to occur in the larger-bodied Pitheciidae and Atelidae. Howlers (Alouatta) are responsible for almost a third of reports, which are concentrated in the more frugivorous species, Alouatta belzebul and Alouatta seniculus. Geophagy may also be relatively common in the spider monkeys (Ateles) and the pitheciids, which are specialised frugivores and seed predators, respectively. An overview of the available data points to a marked Amazonian bias, allowing for geographical differences in the number of species and field studies. This pattern is demonstrated most emphatically by Alouatta, for which there are almost as many reports as field studies in the Amazon basin, in stark contrast with Central American sites, which have a long tradition of fieldwork, but no published records of geophagy. There are also relatively few reports from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Despite the growth in reports, and the patterns identified here, the functional aspects of geophagy in the platyrrhines still remain unclear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信