来自专科记忆诊所的主观认知能力下降的认知完整老年人的低神经心理测试分数的多变量基础率。

Kristoffer Romero, Astrid Coleman, Arjan Heir, Larry Leach, Guy B Proulx
{"title":"来自专科记忆诊所的主观认知能力下降的认知完整老年人的低神经心理测试分数的多变量基础率。","authors":"Kristoffer Romero,&nbsp;Astrid Coleman,&nbsp;Arjan Heir,&nbsp;Larry Leach,&nbsp;Guy B Proulx","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acac050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To avoid misdiagnosing mild cognitive impairment (MCI), knowledge of the multivariate base rates (MVBRs) of low scores on neuropsychological tests is crucial. Base rates have typically been determined from normative population samples, which may differ from clinically referred samples. The current study addresses this limitation by calculating the MVBR of low or high cognitive scores in older adults who presented to a memory clinic experiencing subjective cognitive decline but were not diagnosed with MCI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We determined the MVBRs on the Kaplan-Baycrest Neurocognitive Assessment for 107 cognitively healthy older adults (M age = 75.81), by calculating the frequency of patients producing n scores below or above different cut-off values (i.e., 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 SD from the mean), stratifying by education and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performing below or above cut-off was common, with more stringent cut-offs leading to lower base rates (≥1 low scores occurred in 84.1% of older adults at -1 SD, 55.1% at -1.5 SD, and 39.3% at -2 SD below the mean; ≥1 high scores occurred in 80.4% of older adults at +1 SD, 35.5% at +1.5 SD, and 16.8% at +2 SD above the mean). Higher education was associated with varying base rates. Overall, the MVBR of obtaining a low cognitive test score was higher in this clinic sample, compared with prior studies of normative samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MVBRs for clinically referred older adults experiencing memory complaints provide a diagnostic benefit, helping to prevent attributing normal variability to cognitive impairment and limiting false positive diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":"1467-1479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multivariate Base Rates of Low Neuropsychological Test Scores in Cognitively Intact Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline from a Specialist Memory Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Kristoffer Romero,&nbsp;Astrid Coleman,&nbsp;Arjan Heir,&nbsp;Larry Leach,&nbsp;Guy B Proulx\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acac050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To avoid misdiagnosing mild cognitive impairment (MCI), knowledge of the multivariate base rates (MVBRs) of low scores on neuropsychological tests is crucial. Base rates have typically been determined from normative population samples, which may differ from clinically referred samples. The current study addresses this limitation by calculating the MVBR of low or high cognitive scores in older adults who presented to a memory clinic experiencing subjective cognitive decline but were not diagnosed with MCI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We determined the MVBRs on the Kaplan-Baycrest Neurocognitive Assessment for 107 cognitively healthy older adults (M age = 75.81), by calculating the frequency of patients producing n scores below or above different cut-off values (i.e., 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 SD from the mean), stratifying by education and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performing below or above cut-off was common, with more stringent cut-offs leading to lower base rates (≥1 low scores occurred in 84.1% of older adults at -1 SD, 55.1% at -1.5 SD, and 39.3% at -2 SD below the mean; ≥1 high scores occurred in 80.4% of older adults at +1 SD, 35.5% at +1.5 SD, and 16.8% at +2 SD above the mean). Higher education was associated with varying base rates. Overall, the MVBR of obtaining a low cognitive test score was higher in this clinic sample, compared with prior studies of normative samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MVBRs for clinically referred older adults experiencing memory complaints provide a diagnostic benefit, helping to prevent attributing normal variability to cognitive impairment and limiting false positive diagnoses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1467-1479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:了解神经心理测试低分的多变量基础率(MVBRs)是避免轻度认知障碍(MCI)误诊的关键。基本比率通常从标准人群样本中确定,这可能与临床参考样本不同。目前的研究通过计算在记忆诊所经历主观认知能力下降但未被诊断为轻度认知障碍的老年人的低或高认知评分的MVBR来解决这一局限性。方法:对107名认知健康的老年人(M年龄= 75.81)进行Kaplan-Baycrest神经认知评估,通过计算n分低于或高于不同临界值(即离平均值1、1.5、2.0、2.5个标准差)的患者的频率,按教育程度和性别分层,确定mvbr。结果:低于或高于临界值的情况很常见,更严格的临界值导致较低的基本率(≥1分的老年人在-1 SD时出现低得分,-1.5 SD时为55.1%,-2 SD时为39.3%;≥1分的老年人在+1个标准差时得分为80.4%,+1.5个标准差时得分为35.5%,+2个标准差时得分为16.8%)。高等教育与不同的基本比率有关。总体而言,与以往研究的规范样本相比,该临床样本中获得低认知测试分数的MVBR更高。结论:MVBRs对临床转诊的经历记忆抱怨的老年人提供了诊断益处,有助于防止将正常变异性归因于认知障碍并限制假阳性诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multivariate Base Rates of Low Neuropsychological Test Scores in Cognitively Intact Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline from a Specialist Memory Clinic.

Objective: To avoid misdiagnosing mild cognitive impairment (MCI), knowledge of the multivariate base rates (MVBRs) of low scores on neuropsychological tests is crucial. Base rates have typically been determined from normative population samples, which may differ from clinically referred samples. The current study addresses this limitation by calculating the MVBR of low or high cognitive scores in older adults who presented to a memory clinic experiencing subjective cognitive decline but were not diagnosed with MCI.

Method: We determined the MVBRs on the Kaplan-Baycrest Neurocognitive Assessment for 107 cognitively healthy older adults (M age = 75.81), by calculating the frequency of patients producing n scores below or above different cut-off values (i.e., 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 SD from the mean), stratifying by education and gender.

Results: Performing below or above cut-off was common, with more stringent cut-offs leading to lower base rates (≥1 low scores occurred in 84.1% of older adults at -1 SD, 55.1% at -1.5 SD, and 39.3% at -2 SD below the mean; ≥1 high scores occurred in 80.4% of older adults at +1 SD, 35.5% at +1.5 SD, and 16.8% at +2 SD above the mean). Higher education was associated with varying base rates. Overall, the MVBR of obtaining a low cognitive test score was higher in this clinic sample, compared with prior studies of normative samples.

Conclusions: MVBRs for clinically referred older adults experiencing memory complaints provide a diagnostic benefit, helping to prevent attributing normal variability to cognitive impairment and limiting false positive diagnoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信