氯氮平治疗患者增加卡吡嗪的有效性和安全性:一项初步研究。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2022-11-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20451253221132087
Sofia Pappa, Arturas Kalniunas, Hitendra Sharma, Ali Raza-Syed, Manzar Kamal, Fintan Larkin
{"title":"氯氮平治疗患者增加卡吡嗪的有效性和安全性:一项初步研究。","authors":"Sofia Pappa,&nbsp;Arturas Kalniunas,&nbsp;Hitendra Sharma,&nbsp;Ali Raza-Syed,&nbsp;Manzar Kamal,&nbsp;Fintan Larkin","doi":"10.1177/20451253221132087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cariprazine, a novel antipsychotic drug, is a partial agonist of dopamine D2/D3 receptors with preferential binding to the D3 receptor. There has been an increasing interest in cariprazine augmentation to clozapine; however, the evidence thus far has been only limited to case reports and case series.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the augmentation of clozapine with cariprazine in patients with sub-optimal treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic and clinical information of the study population were collected from the electronic records and PANSS scale administered at baseline and 3 months. Tolerability and discontinuation reasons where applicable were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients (four men and six women) with a mean age of 36.5 years (range = 26-45) were included. Reasons for cariprazine initiation included inadequate treatment response, persistent negative symptoms and/or tolerability issues with clozapine or previous augmentation options. Two patients discontinued cariprazine within the first 6 weeks due to restlessness and poor response, respectively. There was a significant reduction in the median total PANSS score from baseline to 3 months (from 59 to 22.5, <i>p</i> < 0.05), median positive PANSS score (from 11.5 to 5.5, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and in the median negative PANSS score (from 15.5 to 3, <i>p</i> < 0.05) which correspond to a 48%, 33.8% and 65.8% mean score reduction, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of clozapine augmentation. The preliminary evidence suggests that this may be a safe and effective practice in patients failing to adequately respond to or tolerate clozapine and/or previous augmentation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":" ","pages":"20451253221132087"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/96/6b/10.1177_20451253221132087.PMC9685211.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of cariprazine augmentation in patients treated with clozapine: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Pappa,&nbsp;Arturas Kalniunas,&nbsp;Hitendra Sharma,&nbsp;Ali Raza-Syed,&nbsp;Manzar Kamal,&nbsp;Fintan Larkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20451253221132087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cariprazine, a novel antipsychotic drug, is a partial agonist of dopamine D2/D3 receptors with preferential binding to the D3 receptor. There has been an increasing interest in cariprazine augmentation to clozapine; however, the evidence thus far has been only limited to case reports and case series.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the augmentation of clozapine with cariprazine in patients with sub-optimal treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic and clinical information of the study population were collected from the electronic records and PANSS scale administered at baseline and 3 months. Tolerability and discontinuation reasons where applicable were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients (four men and six women) with a mean age of 36.5 years (range = 26-45) were included. Reasons for cariprazine initiation included inadequate treatment response, persistent negative symptoms and/or tolerability issues with clozapine or previous augmentation options. Two patients discontinued cariprazine within the first 6 weeks due to restlessness and poor response, respectively. There was a significant reduction in the median total PANSS score from baseline to 3 months (from 59 to 22.5, <i>p</i> < 0.05), median positive PANSS score (from 11.5 to 5.5, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and in the median negative PANSS score (from 15.5 to 3, <i>p</i> < 0.05) which correspond to a 48%, 33.8% and 65.8% mean score reduction, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of clozapine augmentation. The preliminary evidence suggests that this may be a safe and effective practice in patients failing to adequately respond to or tolerate clozapine and/or previous augmentation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20451253221132087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/96/6b/10.1177_20451253221132087.PMC9685211.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253221132087\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253221132087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:Cariprazine是一种新型抗精神病药物,是多巴胺D2/D3受体的部分激动剂,与D3受体优先结合。人们对氯氮平增加卡吡嗪的兴趣越来越大;然而,迄今为止的证据仅限于病例报告和病例系列。目的:评价氯氮平加卡吡嗪对治疗反应次优患者的疗效和安全性。方法:通过电子病历和基线及3个月时的PANSS量表收集研究人群的人口学和临床信息。在适用的情况下,还记录了耐受性和停产原因。结果:纳入10例患者(4男6女),平均年龄36.5岁(范围26-45岁)。开始使用卡吡嗪的原因包括治疗反应不足、持续的阴性症状和/或氯氮平或先前增强方案的耐受性问题。2例患者分别因躁动和不良反应在前6周内停用卡吡嗪。从基线到3个月,PANSS总评分中位数显著降低(从59降至22.5,p p p p)。结论:这是第一个评估氯氮平增强有效性的试点研究。初步证据表明,对于对氯氮平和/或先前的强化策略没有充分反应或耐受的患者,这可能是一种安全有效的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and safety of cariprazine augmentation in patients treated with clozapine: a pilot study.

Efficacy and safety of cariprazine augmentation in patients treated with clozapine: a pilot study.

Efficacy and safety of cariprazine augmentation in patients treated with clozapine: a pilot study.

Efficacy and safety of cariprazine augmentation in patients treated with clozapine: a pilot study.

Background: Cariprazine, a novel antipsychotic drug, is a partial agonist of dopamine D2/D3 receptors with preferential binding to the D3 receptor. There has been an increasing interest in cariprazine augmentation to clozapine; however, the evidence thus far has been only limited to case reports and case series.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the augmentation of clozapine with cariprazine in patients with sub-optimal treatment response.

Methods: Demographic and clinical information of the study population were collected from the electronic records and PANSS scale administered at baseline and 3 months. Tolerability and discontinuation reasons where applicable were also recorded.

Results: Ten patients (four men and six women) with a mean age of 36.5 years (range = 26-45) were included. Reasons for cariprazine initiation included inadequate treatment response, persistent negative symptoms and/or tolerability issues with clozapine or previous augmentation options. Two patients discontinued cariprazine within the first 6 weeks due to restlessness and poor response, respectively. There was a significant reduction in the median total PANSS score from baseline to 3 months (from 59 to 22.5, p < 0.05), median positive PANSS score (from 11.5 to 5.5, p < 0.05) and in the median negative PANSS score (from 15.5 to 3, p < 0.05) which correspond to a 48%, 33.8% and 65.8% mean score reduction, respectively.

Conclusion: This is the first pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of clozapine augmentation. The preliminary evidence suggests that this may be a safe and effective practice in patients failing to adequately respond to or tolerate clozapine and/or previous augmentation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Electronic Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of electronic materials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials science, engineering, optics, physics, and chemistry into important applications of electronic materials. Sample research topics that span the journal's scope are inorganic, organic, ionic and polymeric materials with properties that include conducting, semiconducting, superconducting, insulating, dielectric, magnetic, optoelectronic, piezoelectric, ferroelectric and thermoelectric. Indexed/​Abstracted: Web of Science SCIE Scopus CAS INSPEC Portico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信