内镜和结肠镜检查患者溶组织内阿米巴、肠贾第虫和隐孢子虫患病率的调查

Q3 Medicine
Mehmet Tugay Eren, Serpil Değerli, Özlem Yönem
{"title":"内镜和结肠镜检查患者溶组织内阿米巴、肠贾第虫和隐孢子虫患病率的调查","authors":"Mehmet Tugay Eren,&nbsp;Serpil Değerli,&nbsp;Özlem Yönem","doi":"10.4274/tpd.galenos.2022.30502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, it was aimed to investigate the presence of <i>Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. in the samples taken during the procedure from patients who underwent endoscopy and/or colonoscopy with different prediagnoses, and in the stools of the same patients, by ELISA and direct microscopy methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 88 patients' endoscopic and colonoscopic pre-washed materials, which consisted of 49 individuals who belong former group and 39 individuals to the next group, were, respectively, obtained, and the stool samples were also included to study from the same group. All the specimens were immediately transferred to the parasitology research laboratory within the same day and stored C until for the next step of ELISA applications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the samples were examined by direct microscopy and ELISA method. In the examinations performed using the ELISA method; <i>E. histolytica</i> was detected in 2 (2.3%) stool samples, and <i>G. intestinalis</i> was found in 4 (4.5%) stool samples. In the colonoscopic wash/swab samples of the patients who underwent colonoscopy, 6 (6.8%) <i>G. intestinalis</i>, 1 (1.1%) <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. detected. No parasites were detected by ELISA in any of the stool samples or endoscopic washing/swab samples of the patients who underwent colonoscopy. No parasites were detected in stool and wash/swab samples by the direct examination method. When the incidence of <i>G. intestinalis</i> in washing/swab samples taken from patients who underwent endoscopy and colonoscopy was statistically compared, the difference was found to be significant (p<0.05). When the incidence of <i>G. intestinalis</i> in the stools of patients who underwent endoscopy was compared, the difference between genders was found to be significant (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with gastrointestinal complaints and undergoing endoscopy and colonoscopy, investigation of the presence of parasites by stool examination with direct microscopy may be insufficient. In addition to the direct examination of the stool sample, it is thought that the investigation of parasite antigens in the wash/swab materials that can be easily taken during the endoscopy and colonoscopy procedure is necessary and critical in the diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":34974,"journal":{"name":"Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi","volume":" ","pages":"281-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the Precence of <i>Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. in Patients Who Undergone Endoscopy and Colonoscopy\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Tugay Eren,&nbsp;Serpil Değerli,&nbsp;Özlem Yönem\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/tpd.galenos.2022.30502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, it was aimed to investigate the presence of <i>Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. in the samples taken during the procedure from patients who underwent endoscopy and/or colonoscopy with different prediagnoses, and in the stools of the same patients, by ELISA and direct microscopy methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 88 patients' endoscopic and colonoscopic pre-washed materials, which consisted of 49 individuals who belong former group and 39 individuals to the next group, were, respectively, obtained, and the stool samples were also included to study from the same group. All the specimens were immediately transferred to the parasitology research laboratory within the same day and stored C until for the next step of ELISA applications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the samples were examined by direct microscopy and ELISA method. In the examinations performed using the ELISA method; <i>E. histolytica</i> was detected in 2 (2.3%) stool samples, and <i>G. intestinalis</i> was found in 4 (4.5%) stool samples. In the colonoscopic wash/swab samples of the patients who underwent colonoscopy, 6 (6.8%) <i>G. intestinalis</i>, 1 (1.1%) <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. detected. No parasites were detected by ELISA in any of the stool samples or endoscopic washing/swab samples of the patients who underwent colonoscopy. No parasites were detected in stool and wash/swab samples by the direct examination method. When the incidence of <i>G. intestinalis</i> in washing/swab samples taken from patients who underwent endoscopy and colonoscopy was statistically compared, the difference was found to be significant (p<0.05). When the incidence of <i>G. intestinalis</i> in the stools of patients who underwent endoscopy was compared, the difference between genders was found to be significant (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with gastrointestinal complaints and undergoing endoscopy and colonoscopy, investigation of the presence of parasites by stool examination with direct microscopy may be insufficient. In addition to the direct examination of the stool sample, it is thought that the investigation of parasite antigens in the wash/swab materials that can be easily taken during the endoscopy and colonoscopy procedure is necessary and critical in the diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"281-287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/tpd.galenos.2022.30502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tpd.galenos.2022.30502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过ELISA法和直接显微镜法,探讨不同预诊的内镜和/或结肠镜检查患者的粪便中溶组织内阿米巴、肠贾第虫和隐孢子虫的存在情况。方法:共获得前一组49例和后一组39例患者的内镜和结肠镜预洗材料88例,并纳入同一组的粪便样本进行研究。所有标本在同一天内立即转移到寄生虫学研究实验室,C库保存,等待下一步ELISA应用。结果:所有样品均采用直接镜检和酶联免疫吸附法检测。ELISA法检测中;2份粪便标本检出溶组织芽胞杆菌(2.3%),4份粪便标本检出肠溶肠芽胞杆菌(4.5%)。结肠镜冲洗/拭子标本中检出肠球菌6只(6.8%),隐孢子虫1只(1.1%)。结肠镜检查患者的粪便样本和内镜冲洗/拭子样本均未检测到寄生虫。粪便和洗拭子标本均未检出寄生虫。比较内镜和结肠镜患者洗涤/拭子样本中G. testinalis的发生率,差异有统计学意义(p .肠镜患者粪便中G. testinalis的发生率,性别差异有统计学意义(p .结论:在有胃肠道疾病并接受内窥镜和结肠镜检查的患者中,通过粪便检查直接显微镜检查寄生虫的存在可能是不够的。除了直接检查粪便样本外,人们认为在内窥镜和结肠镜检查过程中容易获得的洗涤/拭子材料中调查寄生虫抗原是必要的,也是诊断的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of the Precence of Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in Patients Who Undergone Endoscopy and Colonoscopy

Objective: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the presence of Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in the samples taken during the procedure from patients who underwent endoscopy and/or colonoscopy with different prediagnoses, and in the stools of the same patients, by ELISA and direct microscopy methods.

Methods: A total of 88 patients' endoscopic and colonoscopic pre-washed materials, which consisted of 49 individuals who belong former group and 39 individuals to the next group, were, respectively, obtained, and the stool samples were also included to study from the same group. All the specimens were immediately transferred to the parasitology research laboratory within the same day and stored C until for the next step of ELISA applications.

Results: All the samples were examined by direct microscopy and ELISA method. In the examinations performed using the ELISA method; E. histolytica was detected in 2 (2.3%) stool samples, and G. intestinalis was found in 4 (4.5%) stool samples. In the colonoscopic wash/swab samples of the patients who underwent colonoscopy, 6 (6.8%) G. intestinalis, 1 (1.1%) Cryptosporidium spp. detected. No parasites were detected by ELISA in any of the stool samples or endoscopic washing/swab samples of the patients who underwent colonoscopy. No parasites were detected in stool and wash/swab samples by the direct examination method. When the incidence of G. intestinalis in washing/swab samples taken from patients who underwent endoscopy and colonoscopy was statistically compared, the difference was found to be significant (p<0.05). When the incidence of G. intestinalis in the stools of patients who underwent endoscopy was compared, the difference between genders was found to be significant (p<0.05).

Conclusion: In patients with gastrointestinal complaints and undergoing endoscopy and colonoscopy, investigation of the presence of parasites by stool examination with direct microscopy may be insufficient. In addition to the direct examination of the stool sample, it is thought that the investigation of parasite antigens in the wash/swab materials that can be easily taken during the endoscopy and colonoscopy procedure is necessary and critical in the diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi
Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信