NHS图书馆员合作开发了一个搜索库,同行评审和共享COVID-19搜索:评估

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Hélène Gorring MSc, Pip Divall MA, MSc, Sarah Gardner MA, Anne Gray BSc, PG Dip Lib, Alison McLaren MA, Lindsay Snell MA, Eva Thackeray MA, Adam Tocock MA, Gil Young MSc
{"title":"NHS图书馆员合作开发了一个搜索库,同行评审和共享COVID-19搜索:评估","authors":"Hélène Gorring MSc,&nbsp;Pip Divall MA, MSc,&nbsp;Sarah Gardner MA,&nbsp;Anne Gray BSc, PG Dip Lib,&nbsp;Alison McLaren MA,&nbsp;Lindsay Snell MA,&nbsp;Eva Thackeray MA,&nbsp;Adam Tocock MA,&nbsp;Gil Young MSc","doi":"10.1111/hir.12444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, Health Education England (HEE) mobilised a group of expert searchers from NHS libraries in England to develop a platform for librarians to share peer reviewed search strategies and results on the Knowledge for Healthcare website.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>(1) To document the origins of the COVID-19 search bank, (2) evaluate attitudes of NHS librarians in England towards the search bank and (3) identify lessons learned and consider whether the initiative might be developed further.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Structured interviews with the peer reviewers (<i>n</i> = 10) were conducted, and a questionnaire survey of the NHS library community using the search bank was undertaken.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The interviews confirmed the value of collaboration. Expert searchers worked in pairs to peer review submitted search strategies. The survey (85 responses) indicated that a majority had used the search bank, and approved of the project, with some differences of opinion on functionality and future developments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Collaborative working for the search bank probably saved time for individual NHS librarians. The quality of the searches submitted was variable as were librarians' approaches to presentation and development of search strategies. Peer review benefits from a buddy approach among expert searchers and agreement about feedback provided to contributors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Search strategies are the most useful element of a search bank. Peer review can be challenging and would benefit from a formal structure, but it is professionally rewarding.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350244/pdf/HIR-9999-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID-19 searches: an evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Hélène Gorring MSc,&nbsp;Pip Divall MA, MSc,&nbsp;Sarah Gardner MA,&nbsp;Anne Gray BSc, PG Dip Lib,&nbsp;Alison McLaren MA,&nbsp;Lindsay Snell MA,&nbsp;Eva Thackeray MA,&nbsp;Adam Tocock MA,&nbsp;Gil Young MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hir.12444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, Health Education England (HEE) mobilised a group of expert searchers from NHS libraries in England to develop a platform for librarians to share peer reviewed search strategies and results on the Knowledge for Healthcare website.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>(1) To document the origins of the COVID-19 search bank, (2) evaluate attitudes of NHS librarians in England towards the search bank and (3) identify lessons learned and consider whether the initiative might be developed further.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Structured interviews with the peer reviewers (<i>n</i> = 10) were conducted, and a questionnaire survey of the NHS library community using the search bank was undertaken.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The interviews confirmed the value of collaboration. Expert searchers worked in pairs to peer review submitted search strategies. The survey (85 responses) indicated that a majority had used the search bank, and approved of the project, with some differences of opinion on functionality and future developments.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Collaborative working for the search bank probably saved time for individual NHS librarians. The quality of the searches submitted was variable as were librarians' approaches to presentation and development of search strategies. Peer review benefits from a buddy approach among expert searchers and agreement about feedback provided to contributors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Search strategies are the most useful element of a search bank. Peer review can be challenging and would benefit from a formal structure, but it is professionally rewarding.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9350244/pdf/HIR-9999-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hir.12444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hir.12444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为应对COVID-19大流行,英格兰健康教育(HEE)动员了一组来自英格兰NHS图书馆的专家搜索人员,为图书馆员开发了一个平台,以便在“医疗保健知识”网站上分享同行评审的搜索策略和结果。目标(1)记录COVID-19搜索库的起源,(2)评估英格兰NHS图书馆员对搜索库的态度,(3)确定经验教训,并考虑该计划是否可以进一步发展。方法对同行审稿人进行结构化访谈(n = 10),并使用检索库对NHS图书馆社区进行问卷调查。结果访谈证实了协作的价值。专家搜索者两人一组,对提交的搜索策略进行同行评审。调查(85份回复)表明,大多数人使用过搜索库,并认可该项目,但在功能和未来发展方面存在一些分歧。搜索库的协作工作可能节省了个人NHS图书馆员的时间。所提交的搜索的质量是可变的,因为图书馆员对搜索策略的呈现和发展的方法是可变的。同行评议得益于专家搜索者之间的伙伴关系,以及对提供给贡献者的反馈意见达成一致。搜索策略是搜索库中最有用的元素。同行评议可能具有挑战性,并且会从正式的结构中受益,但它在专业上是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NHS librarians collaborate to develop a search bank peer reviewing and sharing COVID-19 searches: an evaluation

Background

Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, Health Education England (HEE) mobilised a group of expert searchers from NHS libraries in England to develop a platform for librarians to share peer reviewed search strategies and results on the Knowledge for Healthcare website.

Objectives

(1) To document the origins of the COVID-19 search bank, (2) evaluate attitudes of NHS librarians in England towards the search bank and (3) identify lessons learned and consider whether the initiative might be developed further.

Methods

Structured interviews with the peer reviewers (n = 10) were conducted, and a questionnaire survey of the NHS library community using the search bank was undertaken.

Results

The interviews confirmed the value of collaboration. Expert searchers worked in pairs to peer review submitted search strategies. The survey (85 responses) indicated that a majority had used the search bank, and approved of the project, with some differences of opinion on functionality and future developments.

Discussion

Collaborative working for the search bank probably saved time for individual NHS librarians. The quality of the searches submitted was variable as were librarians' approaches to presentation and development of search strategies. Peer review benefits from a buddy approach among expert searchers and agreement about feedback provided to contributors.

Conclusion

Search strategies are the most useful element of a search bank. Peer review can be challenging and would benefit from a formal structure, but it is professionally rewarding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信