正畸牵引牙的牙周参数:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 Dentistry
Korean Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2022-11-25 Epub Date: 2022-08-23 DOI:10.4041/kjod22.123
Paola Marques de Mattos, Flavio Magno Gonçalves, Isabela Bittencourt Basso, Aline Xavier Ferraz, Bianca Simone Zeigelboim, José Stechman-Neto, Rosane Sampaio Santos, Cristiano Miranda de Araujo, Odilon Guariza-Filho
{"title":"正畸牵引牙的牙周参数:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Paola Marques de Mattos,&nbsp;Flavio Magno Gonçalves,&nbsp;Isabela Bittencourt Basso,&nbsp;Aline Xavier Ferraz,&nbsp;Bianca Simone Zeigelboim,&nbsp;José Stechman-Neto,&nbsp;Rosane Sampaio Santos,&nbsp;Cristiano Miranda de Araujo,&nbsp;Odilon Guariza-Filho","doi":"10.4041/kjod22.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate periodontal parameters in orthodontically tractioned teeth compared with the respective non-tractioned contralateral teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search strategies were developed for six electronic databases and gray literature. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes of interest. Furthermore, the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2,082 articles were identified, of which 24 were selected for the qualitative synthesis. A significant difference was observed between the impacted and contralateral teeth (mean difference [MD] = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10-0.40; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) when the gingival index was evaluated. Additionally, impacted teeth showed a greater probing depth, with a significant mean difference between the groups (MD = 0.14; 95% CI = 0.07-0.20; I<sup>2</sup> = 6%). Most studies had a low risk of bias; however, the certainty of the evidence was very low owing to the design of existing studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence in the literature indicated that tractioned teeth might show worsening of periodontal parameters related to the gingival index and probing depth; however, the evidence remains uncertain about this outcome. Furthermore, probing depth should be considered regarding its clinical significance because of the small effect size observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49934,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c7/0c/kjod-52-6-420.PMC9701628.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Periodontal parameters in orthodontically tractioned teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Paola Marques de Mattos,&nbsp;Flavio Magno Gonçalves,&nbsp;Isabela Bittencourt Basso,&nbsp;Aline Xavier Ferraz,&nbsp;Bianca Simone Zeigelboim,&nbsp;José Stechman-Neto,&nbsp;Rosane Sampaio Santos,&nbsp;Cristiano Miranda de Araujo,&nbsp;Odilon Guariza-Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.4041/kjod22.123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate periodontal parameters in orthodontically tractioned teeth compared with the respective non-tractioned contralateral teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search strategies were developed for six electronic databases and gray literature. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes of interest. Furthermore, the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2,082 articles were identified, of which 24 were selected for the qualitative synthesis. A significant difference was observed between the impacted and contralateral teeth (mean difference [MD] = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10-0.40; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) when the gingival index was evaluated. Additionally, impacted teeth showed a greater probing depth, with a significant mean difference between the groups (MD = 0.14; 95% CI = 0.07-0.20; I<sup>2</sup> = 6%). Most studies had a low risk of bias; however, the certainty of the evidence was very low owing to the design of existing studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence in the literature indicated that tractioned teeth might show worsening of periodontal parameters related to the gingival index and probing depth; however, the evidence remains uncertain about this outcome. Furthermore, probing depth should be considered regarding its clinical significance because of the small effect size observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c7/0c/kjod-52-6-420.PMC9701628.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod22.123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod22.123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本系统综述旨在评价正畸牵引牙与非牵引对侧牙的牙周参数。方法:对6个电子数据库和灰色文献制定检索策略。对相关结果进行随机效应荟萃分析。此外,使用GRADE(分级建议评估、发展和评价)工具评估证据的确定性。结果:共鉴定2082篇,其中24篇入选定性合成。阻生牙与对侧牙差异有统计学意义(平均差异[MD] = 0.25;95%置信区间[CI] = 0.10-0.40;I2 = 0%),评估牙龈指数。此外,阻生牙探探深度更大,组间平均差异显著(MD = 0.14;95% ci = 0.07-0.20;I2 = 6%)。大多数研究的偏倚风险较低;然而,由于现有研究的设计,证据的确定性非常低。结论:文献证据表明,牵引牙可能导致与牙龈指数和探诊深度相关的牙周参数恶化;然而,关于这一结果的证据仍然不确定。此外,由于观察到的效应量较小,应考虑探查深度的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Periodontal parameters in orthodontically tractioned teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Periodontal parameters in orthodontically tractioned teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Periodontal parameters in orthodontically tractioned teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Periodontal parameters in orthodontically tractioned teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate periodontal parameters in orthodontically tractioned teeth compared with the respective non-tractioned contralateral teeth.

Methods: Search strategies were developed for six electronic databases and gray literature. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes of interest. Furthermore, the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) tool.

Results: Overall, 2,082 articles were identified, of which 24 were selected for the qualitative synthesis. A significant difference was observed between the impacted and contralateral teeth (mean difference [MD] = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10-0.40; I2 = 0%) when the gingival index was evaluated. Additionally, impacted teeth showed a greater probing depth, with a significant mean difference between the groups (MD = 0.14; 95% CI = 0.07-0.20; I2 = 6%). Most studies had a low risk of bias; however, the certainty of the evidence was very low owing to the design of existing studies.

Conclusions: The evidence in the literature indicated that tractioned teeth might show worsening of periodontal parameters related to the gingival index and probing depth; however, the evidence remains uncertain about this outcome. Furthermore, probing depth should be considered regarding its clinical significance because of the small effect size observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Orthodontics
Korean Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Orthodontics (KJO) is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal published in January, March, May, July, September, and November each year. It was first launched in 1970 and, as the official scientific publication of Korean Association of Orthodontists, KJO aims to publish high quality clinical and scientific original research papers in all areas related to orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Specifically, its interest focuses on evidence-based investigations of contemporary diagnostic procedures and treatment techniques, expanding to significant clinical reports of diverse treatment approaches. The scope of KJO covers all areas of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics including successful diagnostic procedures and treatment planning, growth and development of the face and its clinical implications, appliance designs, biomechanics, TMJ disorders and adult treatment. Specifically, its latest interest focuses on skeletal anchorage devices, orthodontic appliance and biomaterials, 3 dimensional imaging techniques utilized for dentofacial diagnosis and treatment planning, and orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal disharmony in association of orthodontic treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信