纤维增强、大块填充和常规牙科复合材料的比较评价:物理特性和聚合性能。

Q3 Medicine
Parham Pedram, Shiva Jafarnia, Sima Shahabi, Sogol Saberi, Hamidreza Hajizamani
{"title":"纤维增强、大块填充和常规牙科复合材料的比较评价:物理特性和聚合性能。","authors":"Parham Pedram,&nbsp;Shiva Jafarnia,&nbsp;Sima Shahabi,&nbsp;Sogol Saberi,&nbsp;Hamidreza Hajizamani","doi":"10.17219/pim/151857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resin composites have various applications. At the same time, they have some drawbacks, such as polymerization shrinkage. Conventional composites are polymerized in 2-mm thick layers. However, in posterior restoration, the 2-mm depth of cure is not satisfactory. To find a solution, resin composites have been vastly improved in terms of fillers, matrix and initiators.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate polymerization properties and physical characteristics of fiber-reinforced composites and compare them with bulk-fill composites that are designed for large posterior restorations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Samples were prepared from each resin composite. The 3-point bending test was performed to evaluate the flexural strength of all composites. The depth of cure of the composite from 1 mm to 4 mm of depth was analyzed using Vickers hardness test (VHN). To analyze the degree of conversion, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) of the top and bottom surfaces of the samples with 4-mm thickness was calculated. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by post hoc test (95% confidence interval (95% CI)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Filtek showed the highest flexural strength followed by everX and X-tra fil. At 1-mm depth, X-tra fil had the highest and Gradia had the lowest microhardness. At the 4-mm depth, the microhardness trend was as follows: everX > Filtek > X-tra fil > Gradia > Beautifil. The everX composite had the lowest reduction of the degree of conversion at 4-mm thickness, which showed a significant difference in comparison with Filtek, Gradia and X-tra fil composites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results of our study, it can be concluded that the fiber-reinforced composite everX showed more favorable results regarding polymerization properties, such as the degree of conversion and the depth of cure. However, the flexural strength results in Filtek were better than those in everX.</p>","PeriodicalId":20355,"journal":{"name":"Polimery w medycynie","volume":" ","pages":"13-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of fiber-reinforced, bulk-fill and conventional dental composites: Physical characteristics and polymerization properties.\",\"authors\":\"Parham Pedram,&nbsp;Shiva Jafarnia,&nbsp;Sima Shahabi,&nbsp;Sogol Saberi,&nbsp;Hamidreza Hajizamani\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/pim/151857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resin composites have various applications. At the same time, they have some drawbacks, such as polymerization shrinkage. Conventional composites are polymerized in 2-mm thick layers. However, in posterior restoration, the 2-mm depth of cure is not satisfactory. To find a solution, resin composites have been vastly improved in terms of fillers, matrix and initiators.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate polymerization properties and physical characteristics of fiber-reinforced composites and compare them with bulk-fill composites that are designed for large posterior restorations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Samples were prepared from each resin composite. The 3-point bending test was performed to evaluate the flexural strength of all composites. The depth of cure of the composite from 1 mm to 4 mm of depth was analyzed using Vickers hardness test (VHN). To analyze the degree of conversion, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) of the top and bottom surfaces of the samples with 4-mm thickness was calculated. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by post hoc test (95% confidence interval (95% CI)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Filtek showed the highest flexural strength followed by everX and X-tra fil. At 1-mm depth, X-tra fil had the highest and Gradia had the lowest microhardness. At the 4-mm depth, the microhardness trend was as follows: everX > Filtek > X-tra fil > Gradia > Beautifil. The everX composite had the lowest reduction of the degree of conversion at 4-mm thickness, which showed a significant difference in comparison with Filtek, Gradia and X-tra fil composites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results of our study, it can be concluded that the fiber-reinforced composite everX showed more favorable results regarding polymerization properties, such as the degree of conversion and the depth of cure. However, the flexural strength results in Filtek were better than those in everX.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polimery w medycynie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polimery w medycynie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/pim/151857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polimery w medycynie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/pim/151857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:树脂复合材料具有多种用途。同时,它们也有一些缺点,如聚合收缩。传统的复合材料是在2毫米厚的层聚合。然而,在后路修复中,2mm的愈合深度是不令人满意的。为了找到解决方案,树脂复合材料在填料、基体和引发剂方面得到了极大的改进。目的:评价纤维增强复合材料的聚合性能和物理特性,并将其与设计用于大型后牙修复的大块填充复合材料进行比较。材料和方法:由每种树脂复合材料制备样品。采用三点弯曲试验对所有复合材料的抗弯强度进行评价。采用维氏硬度试验(VHN)分析了复合材料在1 ~ 4 mm深度的固化深度。为了分析转换程度,计算了厚度为4 mm的样品的上下表面的傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)。资料分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验和事后检验(95%置信区间(95% CI))。结果:Filtek的抗弯强度最高,其次是everX和X-tra fil。在1 mm深度处,X-tra fil的显微硬度最高,gradient的显微硬度最低。在4 mm深度处,显微硬度的变化趋势为:everX > Filtek > X-tra fil > gradient > Beautifil。everX复合材料在4 mm厚度处转化程度降低最低,与Filtek、gradient和X-tra fil复合材料相比差异显著。结论:根据我们的研究结果,可以得出结论,纤维增强复合材料everX在聚合性能方面表现出更有利的结果,如转化程度和固化深度。然而,Filtek的抗弯强度结果优于everX。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of fiber-reinforced, bulk-fill and conventional dental composites: Physical characteristics and polymerization properties.

Background: Resin composites have various applications. At the same time, they have some drawbacks, such as polymerization shrinkage. Conventional composites are polymerized in 2-mm thick layers. However, in posterior restoration, the 2-mm depth of cure is not satisfactory. To find a solution, resin composites have been vastly improved in terms of fillers, matrix and initiators.

Objectives: To evaluate polymerization properties and physical characteristics of fiber-reinforced composites and compare them with bulk-fill composites that are designed for large posterior restorations.

Material and methods: Samples were prepared from each resin composite. The 3-point bending test was performed to evaluate the flexural strength of all composites. The depth of cure of the composite from 1 mm to 4 mm of depth was analyzed using Vickers hardness test (VHN). To analyze the degree of conversion, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) of the top and bottom surfaces of the samples with 4-mm thickness was calculated. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by post hoc test (95% confidence interval (95% CI)).

Results: The Filtek showed the highest flexural strength followed by everX and X-tra fil. At 1-mm depth, X-tra fil had the highest and Gradia had the lowest microhardness. At the 4-mm depth, the microhardness trend was as follows: everX > Filtek > X-tra fil > Gradia > Beautifil. The everX composite had the lowest reduction of the degree of conversion at 4-mm thickness, which showed a significant difference in comparison with Filtek, Gradia and X-tra fil composites.

Conclusions: Based on the results of our study, it can be concluded that the fiber-reinforced composite everX showed more favorable results regarding polymerization properties, such as the degree of conversion and the depth of cure. However, the flexural strength results in Filtek were better than those in everX.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polimery w medycynie
Polimery w medycynie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信