酒精依赖中的自动接近行为:认知偏差修正训练是否影响巴甫洛夫-工具转移效应?

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychobiology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-18 DOI:10.1159/000526805
Ke Chen, Maria Garbusow, Miriam Sebold, Hilmar G Zech, Ulrich Zimmermann, Andreas Heinz
{"title":"酒精依赖中的自动接近行为:认知偏差修正训练是否影响巴甫洛夫-工具转移效应?","authors":"Ke Chen,&nbsp;Maria Garbusow,&nbsp;Miriam Sebold,&nbsp;Hilmar G Zech,&nbsp;Ulrich Zimmermann,&nbsp;Andreas Heinz","doi":"10.1159/000526805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Positively conditioned Pavlovian cues tend to promote approach and negative cues promote withdrawal in a Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) paradigm, and the strength of this PIT effect was associated with the subsequent relapse risk in alcohol-dependent (AD) patients. When investigating the effect of alcohol-related background cues, instrumental approach behavior was inhibited in subsequent abstainers but not relapsers. An automatic approach bias towards alcohol can be modified using a cognitive bias modification (CBM) intervention, which has previously been shown to reduce the relapse risk in AD patients. Here we examined the effects of such CBM training on PIT effects and explored its effect on the relapse risk in detoxified AD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N = 81 recently detoxified AD patients performed non-drug-related and drug-related PIT tasks before and after CBM versus placebo training. In addition, an alcohol approach/avoidance task (aAAT) was performed before and after the training to assess the alcohol approach bias. Patients were followed up for 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A stronger alcohol approach bias as well as a stronger non-drug-related PIT effect predicted relapse status in AD patients. No significant difference regarding relapse status or the number of heavy drinking days was found when comparing the CBM training group versus the placebo group. Moreover, there was no significant modulation effect of CBM training on any PIT effect or the aAAT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher alcohol approach bias in the aAAT and a stronger non-drug-related PIT effect both predicted relapse in AD patients, while treatment outcome was not associated with the drug-related PIT effect. Unlike expected, CBM training did not significantly interact with the non-drug-related or the drug-related PIT effects or the alcohol approach bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":19239,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic Approach Behaviors in Alcohol Dependence: Does a Cognitive Bias Modification Training Affect Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer Effects?\",\"authors\":\"Ke Chen,&nbsp;Maria Garbusow,&nbsp;Miriam Sebold,&nbsp;Hilmar G Zech,&nbsp;Ulrich Zimmermann,&nbsp;Andreas Heinz\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000526805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Positively conditioned Pavlovian cues tend to promote approach and negative cues promote withdrawal in a Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) paradigm, and the strength of this PIT effect was associated with the subsequent relapse risk in alcohol-dependent (AD) patients. When investigating the effect of alcohol-related background cues, instrumental approach behavior was inhibited in subsequent abstainers but not relapsers. An automatic approach bias towards alcohol can be modified using a cognitive bias modification (CBM) intervention, which has previously been shown to reduce the relapse risk in AD patients. Here we examined the effects of such CBM training on PIT effects and explored its effect on the relapse risk in detoxified AD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N = 81 recently detoxified AD patients performed non-drug-related and drug-related PIT tasks before and after CBM versus placebo training. In addition, an alcohol approach/avoidance task (aAAT) was performed before and after the training to assess the alcohol approach bias. Patients were followed up for 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A stronger alcohol approach bias as well as a stronger non-drug-related PIT effect predicted relapse status in AD patients. No significant difference regarding relapse status or the number of heavy drinking days was found when comparing the CBM training group versus the placebo group. Moreover, there was no significant modulation effect of CBM training on any PIT effect or the aAAT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher alcohol approach bias in the aAAT and a stronger non-drug-related PIT effect both predicted relapse in AD patients, while treatment outcome was not associated with the drug-related PIT effect. Unlike expected, CBM training did not significantly interact with the non-drug-related or the drug-related PIT effects or the alcohol approach bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychobiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526805\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526805","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在巴甫洛夫-工具转移(PIT)范式中,积极条件的巴甫洛夫线索倾向于促进接近,而消极条件的巴甫洛夫线索倾向于促进戒断,并且这种PIT效应的强度与酒精依赖(AD)患者随后的复发风险相关。当调查酒精相关背景线索的影响时,工具接近行为在随后的戒酒者中受到抑制,但在复吸者中没有。对酒精的自动偏倚可以通过认知偏倚矫正(CBM)干预来改变,这已经被证明可以降低阿尔茨海默病患者的复发风险。在这里,我们研究了这种CBM训练对PIT效果的影响,并探讨了其对解毒AD患者复发风险的影响。方法:N = 81例最近解毒的AD患者在CBM与安慰剂训练前后分别进行了非药物相关和药物相关的PIT任务。此外,在训练前后进行酒精接近/回避任务(aAAT)以评估酒精接近偏差。随访6个月。结果:较强的酒精方法偏倚以及较强的非药物相关PIT效应预测AD患者的复发状态。当CBM训练组与安慰剂组比较时,在复发状态或重度饮酒天数方面没有发现显著差异。此外,CBM训练对任何PIT效应或aAAT均无显著调节作用。结论:aAAT中较高的酒精方法偏倚和较强的非药物相关PIT效应均可预测AD患者的复发,而治疗结果与药物相关PIT效应无关。与预期不同的是,CBM训练与非药物相关或药物相关的PIT效应或酒精方法偏差没有显著的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatic Approach Behaviors in Alcohol Dependence: Does a Cognitive Bias Modification Training Affect Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer Effects?

Introduction: Positively conditioned Pavlovian cues tend to promote approach and negative cues promote withdrawal in a Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) paradigm, and the strength of this PIT effect was associated with the subsequent relapse risk in alcohol-dependent (AD) patients. When investigating the effect of alcohol-related background cues, instrumental approach behavior was inhibited in subsequent abstainers but not relapsers. An automatic approach bias towards alcohol can be modified using a cognitive bias modification (CBM) intervention, which has previously been shown to reduce the relapse risk in AD patients. Here we examined the effects of such CBM training on PIT effects and explored its effect on the relapse risk in detoxified AD patients.

Methods: N = 81 recently detoxified AD patients performed non-drug-related and drug-related PIT tasks before and after CBM versus placebo training. In addition, an alcohol approach/avoidance task (aAAT) was performed before and after the training to assess the alcohol approach bias. Patients were followed up for 6 months.

Results: A stronger alcohol approach bias as well as a stronger non-drug-related PIT effect predicted relapse status in AD patients. No significant difference regarding relapse status or the number of heavy drinking days was found when comparing the CBM training group versus the placebo group. Moreover, there was no significant modulation effect of CBM training on any PIT effect or the aAAT.

Conclusion: A higher alcohol approach bias in the aAAT and a stronger non-drug-related PIT effect both predicted relapse in AD patients, while treatment outcome was not associated with the drug-related PIT effect. Unlike expected, CBM training did not significantly interact with the non-drug-related or the drug-related PIT effects or the alcohol approach bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychobiology
Neuropsychobiology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The biological approach to mental disorders continues to yield innovative findings of clinical importance, particularly if methodologies are combined. This journal collects high quality empirical studies from various experimental and clinical approaches in the fields of Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology. It features original, clinical and basic research in the fields of neurophysiology and functional imaging, neuropharmacology and neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and neuroimmunology, genetics and their relationships with normal psychology and psychopathology. In addition, the reader will find studies on animal models of mental disorders and therapeutic interventions, and pharmacoelectroencephalographic studies. Regular reviews report new methodologic approaches, and selected case reports provide hints for future research. ''Neuropsychobiology'' is a complete record of strategies and methodologies employed to study the biological basis of mental functions including their interactions with psychological and social factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信