自动神经心理评估量表的效度测量。

IF 2.1
John E Meyers, Ronald Mellado Miller, Andrea S Vincent
{"title":"自动神经心理评估量表的效度测量。","authors":"John E Meyers,&nbsp;Ronald Mellado Miller,&nbsp;Andrea S Vincent","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acac046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) is one of the most widely used and validated neuropsychological instruments for assessing cognition. The ANAM Test System includes a reporting tool, the ANAM Validity Indicator Report that generates scores for the embedded effort measure, the ANAM Performance Validity Index (APVI). The current study seeks to develop a proxy for the APVI, using raw subtest summary test scores. This would be useful for situations where the APVI score is unavailable (e.g., validity report not generated at the time of the assessment) or when the item level data needed to generate this score are inaccessible. ANAM scores from a large data set of 1,000,000+ observations were used for this retrospective analysis. Results of linear regression analysis suggest that the APVI can be reasonably estimated from the raw subtest summary test scores that are presented on the ANAM Performance Report. Clinically, this means that an important step in the interpretation process, checking the validity of test data, can still be performed even when the APVI is not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":"1765-1771"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Validity Measure for the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics.\",\"authors\":\"John E Meyers,&nbsp;Ronald Mellado Miller,&nbsp;Andrea S Vincent\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acac046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) is one of the most widely used and validated neuropsychological instruments for assessing cognition. The ANAM Test System includes a reporting tool, the ANAM Validity Indicator Report that generates scores for the embedded effort measure, the ANAM Performance Validity Index (APVI). The current study seeks to develop a proxy for the APVI, using raw subtest summary test scores. This would be useful for situations where the APVI score is unavailable (e.g., validity report not generated at the time of the assessment) or when the item level data needed to generate this score are inaccessible. ANAM scores from a large data set of 1,000,000+ observations were used for this retrospective analysis. Results of linear regression analysis suggest that the APVI can be reasonably estimated from the raw subtest summary test scores that are presented on the ANAM Performance Report. Clinically, this means that an important step in the interpretation process, checking the validity of test data, can still be performed even when the APVI is not available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1765-1771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

自动神经心理评估量表(ANAM)是一种应用最广泛、最有效的认知评估神经心理工具。ANAM测试系统包括一个报告工具,ANAM有效性指标报告,它为嵌入的努力度量,ANAM绩效有效性指数(APVI)生成分数。目前的研究试图开发一种替代APVI的方法,使用原始的子测试总结测试分数。这对于无法获得APVI分数的情况(例如,评估时未生成有效性报告)或无法获得生成该分数所需的项目级别数据时非常有用。该回顾性分析使用了来自1,000,000多个观察结果的大型数据集的ANAM评分。线性回归分析的结果表明,APVI可以从ANAM绩效报告中提供的原始子测试总结测试分数中合理估计。在临床上,这意味着即使在没有APVI的情况下,仍然可以进行解释过程中的一个重要步骤,即检查测试数据的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Validity Measure for the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics.

The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) is one of the most widely used and validated neuropsychological instruments for assessing cognition. The ANAM Test System includes a reporting tool, the ANAM Validity Indicator Report that generates scores for the embedded effort measure, the ANAM Performance Validity Index (APVI). The current study seeks to develop a proxy for the APVI, using raw subtest summary test scores. This would be useful for situations where the APVI score is unavailable (e.g., validity report not generated at the time of the assessment) or when the item level data needed to generate this score are inaccessible. ANAM scores from a large data set of 1,000,000+ observations were used for this retrospective analysis. Results of linear regression analysis suggest that the APVI can be reasonably estimated from the raw subtest summary test scores that are presented on the ANAM Performance Report. Clinically, this means that an important step in the interpretation process, checking the validity of test data, can still be performed even when the APVI is not available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信