全科医学远程会诊——系统综述。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zdravstveno Varstvo Pub Date : 2022-09-28 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.2478/sjph-2022-0030
Staša Vodička, Erika Zelko
{"title":"全科医学远程会诊——系统综述。","authors":"Staša Vodička,&nbsp;Erika Zelko","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2022-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Remote consultations in general practice can be very useful form of telemedicine, which is basically a way to exchange medical information to improve the clinical health of patients when the patient and their general practitioner (GP) are not on the same place at the same time. This concept was developed in the 1980s to provide health care to patients who lived in remote areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We were interested in researching what kind of remote consultations are available in general practice and what is the usage of these methods. We used four keywords - remote consultation and general practice or family medicine or primary care - and we searched in four different scientific databases: Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEX Xplore.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We used a PRISMA diagram to identify studies and search the four main databases, we investigated 48 full text articles and when we applied our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies were included in this systematic review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review covers the topics of remote consultation versus a traditional or classic physical consultation. Studies have shown its importance prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and its value while in the mist of the pandemic then caring for infected patients. We have found that remote consultation is necessary, but it must be an improvement on the previous system. Teleconsultations can reduce the number of visits, especially during lockdown situations, with both patients and GPs satisfied with the method, but we should not forget that a physical consultation cannot be fully replaced by a remote consultation due to the limitations of the latter.</p>","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/d0/sjph-61-224.PMC9597895.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote Consultations in General Practice - A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Staša Vodička,&nbsp;Erika Zelko\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sjph-2022-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Remote consultations in general practice can be very useful form of telemedicine, which is basically a way to exchange medical information to improve the clinical health of patients when the patient and their general practitioner (GP) are not on the same place at the same time. This concept was developed in the 1980s to provide health care to patients who lived in remote areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We were interested in researching what kind of remote consultations are available in general practice and what is the usage of these methods. We used four keywords - remote consultation and general practice or family medicine or primary care - and we searched in four different scientific databases: Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEX Xplore.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We used a PRISMA diagram to identify studies and search the four main databases, we investigated 48 full text articles and when we applied our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies were included in this systematic review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review covers the topics of remote consultation versus a traditional or classic physical consultation. Studies have shown its importance prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and its value while in the mist of the pandemic then caring for infected patients. We have found that remote consultation is necessary, but it must be an improvement on the previous system. Teleconsultations can reduce the number of visits, especially during lockdown situations, with both patients and GPs satisfied with the method, but we should not forget that a physical consultation cannot be fully replaced by a remote consultation due to the limitations of the latter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zdravstveno Varstvo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/d0/sjph-61-224.PMC9597895.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zdravstveno Varstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2022-0030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2022-0030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

简介:全科医生远程会诊是一种非常有用的远程医疗形式,它基本上是一种交换医疗信息的方式,当患者和他们的全科医生(GP)不在同一地点时,可以改善患者的临床健康状况。这一概念是在20世纪80年代发展起来的,目的是向居住在偏远地区的病人提供保健服务。方法:我们对全科医学中有哪些类型的远程会诊以及这些方法的使用情况感兴趣。我们使用了四个关键词——远程咨询和全科实践、家庭医学或初级保健——我们在四个不同的科学数据库中进行了搜索:Medline-PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和IEEX explore。结果:我们使用PRISMA图来识别研究并搜索四个主要数据库,我们调查了48篇全文文章,当我们应用我们的纳入和排除标准时,12项研究被纳入本系统综述。结论:本系统综述涵盖了远程咨询与传统或经典物理咨询的主题。研究表明,在COVID-19大流行之前,它很重要,在大流行的迷雾中,它的价值在于照顾受感染的病人。我们发现远程会诊是有必要的,但必须是对以前系统的改进。远程会诊可以减少就诊次数,特别是在封锁期间,患者和全科医生都对这种方法感到满意,但我们不应忘记,由于远程会诊的局限性,物理会诊不能完全取代远程会诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Remote Consultations in General Practice - A Systematic Review.

Remote Consultations in General Practice - A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Remote consultations in general practice can be very useful form of telemedicine, which is basically a way to exchange medical information to improve the clinical health of patients when the patient and their general practitioner (GP) are not on the same place at the same time. This concept was developed in the 1980s to provide health care to patients who lived in remote areas.

Methods: We were interested in researching what kind of remote consultations are available in general practice and what is the usage of these methods. We used four keywords - remote consultation and general practice or family medicine or primary care - and we searched in four different scientific databases: Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEX Xplore.

Results: We used a PRISMA diagram to identify studies and search the four main databases, we investigated 48 full text articles and when we applied our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies were included in this systematic review.

Conclusions: This systematic review covers the topics of remote consultation versus a traditional or classic physical consultation. Studies have shown its importance prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and its value while in the mist of the pandemic then caring for infected patients. We have found that remote consultation is necessary, but it must be an improvement on the previous system. Teleconsultations can reduce the number of visits, especially during lockdown situations, with both patients and GPs satisfied with the method, but we should not forget that a physical consultation cannot be fully replaced by a remote consultation due to the limitations of the latter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信