2014-2019 年骨科住院医师培训期间足踝病例接触量和可变性。

Foot & ankle specialist Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-30 DOI:10.1177/19386400221106889
Davis A Hartnett, Christopher J Lama, Edgar Garcia-Lopez, Alan H Daniels, David R Richardson
{"title":"2014-2019 年骨科住院医师培训期间足踝病例接触量和可变性。","authors":"Davis A Hartnett, Christopher J Lama, Edgar Garcia-Lopez, Alan H Daniels, David R Richardson","doi":"10.1177/19386400221106889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to a comprehensive breadth and volume of surgical cases is a fundamental component of orthopaedic education, though standardization of case exposures across residency programs is limited to a small amount of required case minimums. Significant variability in exposure to subspecialty cases, such as foot and ankle surgeries, can create distinctly different residency experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical case logs from 2014 to 2019 for leg/ankle and foot/toes were examined following the 2013 implementation of case minimums. Average surgical case volume across subcategories and the average volume of different residency percentiles were analyzed to assess variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total volume of case exposure for graduating orthopaedic residents has increased significantly since 2014 for both leg/ankle cases (28.6%) and foot/toes (27.8%), though totals were still down compared with when ACGME reporting began in 2007. Arthrodesis exposures have increased significantly for leg/ankle (69.2%) and foot/toes (93.8%) cases since 2014, and ankle arthroscopy has increased 20.7%. Disparities in total cases between 10th and 90th percentile programs have shown a nonsignificant decrease over time, with significant differences between leg/ankle arthrodesis (8-fold), leg/ankle arthroscopy (13-fold), and foot/toe arthrodesis (3.5-fold) in 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mean volume of foot and ankle case exposures among graduating residents has continued to rise since the implementation of case minimums in 2013 but disparities in volume are present, most notably concerning arthrodesis and arthroscopy. Recognition and future attention toward addressing this variability can be meaningful in promoting a more comprehensive, standardized orthopaedics education.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III: Retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"479-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volume and Variability of Foot and Ankle Case Exposure During Orthopaedic Residency: 2014-2019.\",\"authors\":\"Davis A Hartnett, Christopher J Lama, Edgar Garcia-Lopez, Alan H Daniels, David R Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19386400221106889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to a comprehensive breadth and volume of surgical cases is a fundamental component of orthopaedic education, though standardization of case exposures across residency programs is limited to a small amount of required case minimums. Significant variability in exposure to subspecialty cases, such as foot and ankle surgeries, can create distinctly different residency experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical case logs from 2014 to 2019 for leg/ankle and foot/toes were examined following the 2013 implementation of case minimums. Average surgical case volume across subcategories and the average volume of different residency percentiles were analyzed to assess variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total volume of case exposure for graduating orthopaedic residents has increased significantly since 2014 for both leg/ankle cases (28.6%) and foot/toes (27.8%), though totals were still down compared with when ACGME reporting began in 2007. Arthrodesis exposures have increased significantly for leg/ankle (69.2%) and foot/toes (93.8%) cases since 2014, and ankle arthroscopy has increased 20.7%. Disparities in total cases between 10th and 90th percentile programs have shown a nonsignificant decrease over time, with significant differences between leg/ankle arthrodesis (8-fold), leg/ankle arthroscopy (13-fold), and foot/toe arthrodesis (3.5-fold) in 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mean volume of foot and ankle case exposures among graduating residents has continued to rise since the implementation of case minimums in 2013 but disparities in volume are present, most notably concerning arthrodesis and arthroscopy. Recognition and future attention toward addressing this variability can be meaningful in promoting a more comprehensive, standardized orthopaedics education.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III: Retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"479-485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400221106889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400221106889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接触范围广、数量多的手术病例是骨科教育的基本组成部分,但不同住院医师培训项目的病例接触标准化仅限于少量最低要求病例。在接触亚专科病例(如足踝手术)方面存在的巨大差异会产生截然不同的住院医师培训经历:方法:在 2013 年实施最低病例要求后,对毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)2014 年至 2019 年的腿部/踝部和足部/脚趾手术病例日志进行了检查。分析了不同子类别的平均手术病例量和不同住院医师百分位数的平均病例量,以评估其可变性:结果:自2014年以来,即将毕业的骨科住院医师在腿部/踝部病例(28.6%)和足部/脚趾病例(27.8%)方面的平均病例暴露总量显著增加,但与2007年ACGME开始报告时相比,总量仍有所下降。自2014年以来,腿部/踝部(69.2%)和足部/脚趾(93.8%)关节置换术的病例数显著增加,踝关节镜手术增加了20.7%。随着时间的推移,第10百分位和第90百分位项目之间的病例总数差异出现了不明显的下降,2019年,腿/踝关节置换术(8倍)、腿/踝关节镜(13倍)和足/趾关节置换术(3.5倍)之间的差异显著:自 2013 年实施最低病例数以来,即将毕业的住院医师所接触的足踝病例的平均数量持续上升,但在数量上仍存在差异,最明显的是关节置换术和关节镜手术。认识到并在未来关注解决这种差异,对于促进更全面、更标准化的骨科教育很有意义:三级:回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volume and Variability of Foot and Ankle Case Exposure During Orthopaedic Residency: 2014-2019.

Background: Exposure to a comprehensive breadth and volume of surgical cases is a fundamental component of orthopaedic education, though standardization of case exposures across residency programs is limited to a small amount of required case minimums. Significant variability in exposure to subspecialty cases, such as foot and ankle surgeries, can create distinctly different residency experiences.

Methods: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical case logs from 2014 to 2019 for leg/ankle and foot/toes were examined following the 2013 implementation of case minimums. Average surgical case volume across subcategories and the average volume of different residency percentiles were analyzed to assess variability.

Results: The mean total volume of case exposure for graduating orthopaedic residents has increased significantly since 2014 for both leg/ankle cases (28.6%) and foot/toes (27.8%), though totals were still down compared with when ACGME reporting began in 2007. Arthrodesis exposures have increased significantly for leg/ankle (69.2%) and foot/toes (93.8%) cases since 2014, and ankle arthroscopy has increased 20.7%. Disparities in total cases between 10th and 90th percentile programs have shown a nonsignificant decrease over time, with significant differences between leg/ankle arthrodesis (8-fold), leg/ankle arthroscopy (13-fold), and foot/toe arthrodesis (3.5-fold) in 2019.

Conclusion: The mean volume of foot and ankle case exposures among graduating residents has continued to rise since the implementation of case minimums in 2013 but disparities in volume are present, most notably concerning arthrodesis and arthroscopy. Recognition and future attention toward addressing this variability can be meaningful in promoting a more comprehensive, standardized orthopaedics education.

Level of evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信