中国人群反流症状评分-12 与反流症状指数之间存在良好的一致性。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ruimin Yang , Fangfang Liang , Ru Tian , Yang Yao , Ming Zhang , Xiaowen Li
{"title":"中国人群反流症状评分-12 与反流症状指数之间存在良好的一致性。","authors":"Ruimin Yang ,&nbsp;Fangfang Liang ,&nbsp;Ru Tian ,&nbsp;Yang Yao ,&nbsp;Ming Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the consistency between the Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) in Chinese people.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with symptoms of LPR<span><span> from the outpatient otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinic were included. All included patients completed the RSS-12 and RSI. The patient with RSS-12&gt;11 or RSI&gt;13 suggested possible LPR. For the patients with RSI &gt;13 or RSS-12&gt;11, they were treated using diet recommendations and were prescribed a twice-daily </span>pantoprazole<span> for 12 weeks. The consistency between the RSS-12 and RSI was compared with the weighted Cohen's kappa statistic.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 258 patients were included. The mean scores for RSS-12 and RSI were 13.21±17.31 and 12.86±6.15, respectively. The positive rate of LPR was 17.44% based on the RSI, and 24.42% based on the RSS-12. The kappa value between the RSS-12 and RSI was 0.736 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Following 12 weeks of treatment, there was a significant reduction in both RSI and RSS-12. Based on the RSI, 73% of patients had a good treatment response, whereas according to the RSS-12, 85% of patients had a good treatment response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a good consistency between RSS-12 and RSI, meaning that the RSS-12 is a feasible LPR initial screening tool. The RSS-12 provides a more comprehensive evaluation of reflux symptoms and treatment effect than RSI in patients with LPR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":"39 3","pages":"Pages 855.e1-855.e6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"There is a Good Consistency Between Reflux Symptom Score-12 and Reflux Symptom Index in Chinese Population\",\"authors\":\"Ruimin Yang ,&nbsp;Fangfang Liang ,&nbsp;Ru Tian ,&nbsp;Yang Yao ,&nbsp;Ming Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.11.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the consistency between the Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) in Chinese people.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with symptoms of LPR<span><span> from the outpatient otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinic were included. All included patients completed the RSS-12 and RSI. The patient with RSS-12&gt;11 or RSI&gt;13 suggested possible LPR. For the patients with RSI &gt;13 or RSS-12&gt;11, they were treated using diet recommendations and were prescribed a twice-daily </span>pantoprazole<span> for 12 weeks. The consistency between the RSS-12 and RSI was compared with the weighted Cohen's kappa statistic.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 258 patients were included. The mean scores for RSS-12 and RSI were 13.21±17.31 and 12.86±6.15, respectively. The positive rate of LPR was 17.44% based on the RSI, and 24.42% based on the RSS-12. The kappa value between the RSS-12 and RSI was 0.736 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Following 12 weeks of treatment, there was a significant reduction in both RSI and RSS-12. Based on the RSI, 73% of patients had a good treatment response, whereas according to the RSS-12, 85% of patients had a good treatment response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a good consistency between RSS-12 and RSI, meaning that the RSS-12 is a feasible LPR initial screening tool. The RSS-12 provides a more comprehensive evaluation of reflux symptoms and treatment effect than RSI in patients with LPR.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 855.e1-855.e6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892199722003733\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892199722003733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究中国人反流症状评分-12(RSS-12)与反流症状指数(RSI)之间的一致性:方法:纳入耳鼻咽喉头颈外科门诊有 LPR 症状的患者。所有患者均填写了 RSS-12 和 RSI。RSS-12>11或RSI>13的患者提示可能存在LPR。对于 RSI >13 或 RSS-12 >11 的患者,他们接受了饮食建议和为期 12 周的每日两次泮托拉唑处方治疗。用加权科恩卡帕统计法比较了RSS-12和RSI之间的一致性:结果:共纳入 258 名患者。RSS-12和RSI的平均得分分别为(13.21±17.31)分和(12.86±6.15)分。基于 RSI 的 LPR 阳性率为 17.44%,基于 RSS-12 的 LPR 阳性率为 24.42%。RSS-12和RSI之间的卡帕值为0.736(P < 0.001)。治疗 12 周后,RSI 和 RSS-12 均显著下降。根据RSI,73%的患者治疗反应良好,而根据RSS-12,85%的患者治疗反应良好:结论:RSS-12 和 RSI 具有良好的一致性,这意味着 RSS-12 是一种可行的 LPR 初步筛查工具。与 RSI 相比,RSS-12 能更全面地评估 LPR 患者的反流症状和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
There is a Good Consistency Between Reflux Symptom Score-12 and Reflux Symptom Index in Chinese Population

Objective

To investigate the consistency between the Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) in Chinese people.

Methods

Patients with symptoms of LPR from the outpatient otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinic were included. All included patients completed the RSS-12 and RSI. The patient with RSS-12>11 or RSI>13 suggested possible LPR. For the patients with RSI >13 or RSS-12>11, they were treated using diet recommendations and were prescribed a twice-daily pantoprazole for 12 weeks. The consistency between the RSS-12 and RSI was compared with the weighted Cohen's kappa statistic.

Results

A total of 258 patients were included. The mean scores for RSS-12 and RSI were 13.21±17.31 and 12.86±6.15, respectively. The positive rate of LPR was 17.44% based on the RSI, and 24.42% based on the RSS-12. The kappa value between the RSS-12 and RSI was 0.736 (P < 0.001). Following 12 weeks of treatment, there was a significant reduction in both RSI and RSS-12. Based on the RSI, 73% of patients had a good treatment response, whereas according to the RSS-12, 85% of patients had a good treatment response.

Conclusion

There is a good consistency between RSS-12 and RSI, meaning that the RSS-12 is a feasible LPR initial screening tool. The RSS-12 provides a more comprehensive evaluation of reflux symptoms and treatment effect than RSI in patients with LPR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信