关于甲状旁腺切除术的在线健康信息的可读性和质量。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-10-20 eCollection Date: 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1177/2473974X221133308
Jim Byrne, Samuel Keogh, Carolyn Cullinane, Zeeshan Razzaq, Henry Paul Redmond
{"title":"关于甲状旁腺切除术的在线健康信息的可读性和质量。","authors":"Jim Byrne,&nbsp;Samuel Keogh,&nbsp;Carolyn Cullinane,&nbsp;Zeeshan Razzaq,&nbsp;Henry Paul Redmond","doi":"10.1177/2473974X221133308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assessment of the readability and quality of online health information regarding parathyroidectomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Websites providing patient-oriented health information regarding parathyroidectomy obtained via the Google search engine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The top 75 Google search results for \"parathyroidectomy,\"\"parathyroid surgery,\" and \"parathyroid gland removal\" were reviewed. Websites were categorized by website type and country of origin. Readability was assessed by Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook. Website quality was assessed per JAMA benchmark criteria and the DISCERN instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 74 unique websites were evaluated. The mean readability of the assessed websites exceeded the recommended sixth-grade reading level on the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (<i>P</i> < .001). Readability did not vary significantly by website type. Websites originating from the United Kingdom were significantly more readable than those from the United States. The majority of assessed websites were of poor quality (n = 42, 56.8%) on assessment based on the DISCERN instrument. Quality varied significantly by website category on the JAMA benchmark criteria (<i>P</i> < .001) and DISCERN score (<i>P</i> = .049) with commercial websites receiving the highest scores. DISCERN score also varied significantly by country of origin (<i>P</i> = .036) with UK sites receiving highest mean DISCERN scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Online health information regarding parathyroidectomy is largely of poor quality and is poorly readable for many patients. Institutions utilizing well-defined guidelines for development of patient educational resources may provide online health information of greater quality and readability.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"2473974X221133308"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/9b/10.1177_2473974X221133308.PMC9597036.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Jim Byrne,&nbsp;Samuel Keogh,&nbsp;Carolyn Cullinane,&nbsp;Zeeshan Razzaq,&nbsp;Henry Paul Redmond\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2473974X221133308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assessment of the readability and quality of online health information regarding parathyroidectomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Websites providing patient-oriented health information regarding parathyroidectomy obtained via the Google search engine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The top 75 Google search results for \\\"parathyroidectomy,\\\"\\\"parathyroid surgery,\\\" and \\\"parathyroid gland removal\\\" were reviewed. Websites were categorized by website type and country of origin. Readability was assessed by Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook. Website quality was assessed per JAMA benchmark criteria and the DISCERN instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 74 unique websites were evaluated. The mean readability of the assessed websites exceeded the recommended sixth-grade reading level on the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (<i>P</i> < .001). Readability did not vary significantly by website type. Websites originating from the United Kingdom were significantly more readable than those from the United States. The majority of assessed websites were of poor quality (n = 42, 56.8%) on assessment based on the DISCERN instrument. Quality varied significantly by website category on the JAMA benchmark criteria (<i>P</i> < .001) and DISCERN score (<i>P</i> = .049) with commercial websites receiving the highest scores. DISCERN score also varied significantly by country of origin (<i>P</i> = .036) with UK sites receiving highest mean DISCERN scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Online health information regarding parathyroidectomy is largely of poor quality and is poorly readable for many patients. Institutions utilizing well-defined guidelines for development of patient educational resources may provide online health information of greater quality and readability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2473974X221133308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/9b/10.1177_2473974X221133308.PMC9597036.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X221133308\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X221133308","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:评价甲状旁腺切除术相关在线健康信息的可读性和质量。研究设计:横断面分析。设置:通过谷歌搜索引擎获得的关于甲状旁腺切除术的以患者为导向的健康信息网站。方法:对“甲状旁腺切除术”、“甲状旁腺手术”和“甲状旁腺切除”的前75名Google搜索结果进行回顾。网站按网站类型和原产国分类。可读性采用flesch - kinkaid等级水平和简单测量法进行评估。根据JAMA基准标准和DISCERN工具评估网站质量。结果:共评估了74个独特的网站。被评估网站的平均可读性超过了Flesch-Kincaid等级水平和简单测量的六年级推荐阅读水平(P < 0.001)。可读性并没有因网站类型的不同而有显著差异。来自英国的网站明显比来自美国的网站更具可读性。在基于DISCERN工具的评估中,大多数被评估的网站质量较差(n = 42, 56.8%)。在JAMA基准标准(P < 0.001)和DISCERN评分(P = 0.049)上,不同网站类别的质量差异显著,其中商业网站得分最高。辨别分数也因原产国而有显著差异(P = 0.036),英国网站获得最高的平均辨别分数。结论:关于甲状旁腺切除术的在线健康信息质量很差,对许多患者来说可读性差。利用定义明确的指导方针开发患者教育资源的机构可以提供更高质量和可读性的在线健康信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.

Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.

Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.

Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.

Objective: Assessment of the readability and quality of online health information regarding parathyroidectomy.

Study design: Cross-sectional analysis.

Setting: Websites providing patient-oriented health information regarding parathyroidectomy obtained via the Google search engine.

Methods: The top 75 Google search results for "parathyroidectomy,""parathyroid surgery," and "parathyroid gland removal" were reviewed. Websites were categorized by website type and country of origin. Readability was assessed by Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook. Website quality was assessed per JAMA benchmark criteria and the DISCERN instrument.

Results: A total of 74 unique websites were evaluated. The mean readability of the assessed websites exceeded the recommended sixth-grade reading level on the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (P < .001). Readability did not vary significantly by website type. Websites originating from the United Kingdom were significantly more readable than those from the United States. The majority of assessed websites were of poor quality (n = 42, 56.8%) on assessment based on the DISCERN instrument. Quality varied significantly by website category on the JAMA benchmark criteria (P < .001) and DISCERN score (P = .049) with commercial websites receiving the highest scores. DISCERN score also varied significantly by country of origin (P = .036) with UK sites receiving highest mean DISCERN scores.

Conclusion: Online health information regarding parathyroidectomy is largely of poor quality and is poorly readable for many patients. Institutions utilizing well-defined guidelines for development of patient educational resources may provide online health information of greater quality and readability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信